Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The user may lose funds if oracle returns 0 in case of incorrect operation #558

Closed
c4-submissions opened this issue Nov 15, 2023 · 6 comments
Labels
3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working duplicate-34 insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards

Comments

@c4-submissions
Copy link
Contributor

Lines of code

https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-11-kelp/blob/main/src/LRTDepositPool.sol#L95-L110

Vulnerability details

Impact

The function LRTDepositPool.getRsETHAmountToMint() (https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-11-kelp/blob/main/src/LRTDepositPool.sol#L95-L110) calculates the amount of rsETH to mint for a given asset amount .

Proof of Concept

Suppose that the function, due to incorrect operation of the oracle, returned rsethAmountToMint = 0.

In the function _mintRsETH() (https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-11-kelp/blob/main/src/LRTDepositPool.sol#L151-L157) will be called
IRSETH(rsethToken).mint(msg.sender, rsethAmountToMint), which will receive rsethAmountToMint = 0.
Those. The user will receive 0 rsETH tokens.
At the same time, it will send depositAmount: https://github.com/code-423n4/2023-11-kelp/blob/main/src/LRTDepositPool.sol#L136

Tools Used

Manual review

Recommended Mitigation Steps

Check that rsethAmountMinted != 0

Assessed type

Invalid Validation

@c4-submissions c4-submissions added 3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working labels Nov 15, 2023
c4-submissions added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 15, 2023
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as sufficient quality report

@c4-pre-sort c4-pre-sort added the sufficient quality report This report is of sufficient quality label Nov 16, 2023
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as duplicate of #32

@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as insufficient quality report

@c4-pre-sort c4-pre-sort added insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality and removed sufficient quality report This report is of sufficient quality labels Nov 17, 2023
@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as not a duplicate

@c4-pre-sort
Copy link

raymondfam marked the issue as duplicate of #34

@c4-judge c4-judge added the unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards label Dec 1, 2023
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented Dec 1, 2023

fatherGoose1 marked the issue as unsatisfactory:
Invalid

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 (High Risk) Assets can be stolen/lost/compromised directly bug Something isn't working duplicate-34 insufficient quality report This report is not of sufficient quality unsatisfactory does not satisfy C4 submission criteria; not eligible for awards
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants