Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

physicalplan: don't combine render nodes into one processor #97554

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 23, 2023

Conversation

DrewKimball
Copy link
Collaborator

@DrewKimball DrewKimball commented Feb 23, 2023

During planning for a render node, the physical planning logic checks whether the last created processor rendered its own expressions, adds its render expressions to the processor if not. The check is necessary to handle the case when expressions in a parent render reference those from a child render.

However, render nodes also handle projecting input columns: both removing them and reordering them. Correct planning of the processors depends on the columns at each step being in a particular order. Since physical planning didn't check whether the existing processor projected its columns in some way, the parent render could be combined with its child. This could lead to panics in the parent render expressions when the columns weren't projected as expected. This patch fixes the issue by adding the projection check before allowing the render planning code to add to the previous processor.

Fixes #95633

Release note (bug fix): Fixed a rare bug existing since before 22.1 that
could cause a projected expression to replace column references with the
wrong values.

@DrewKimball DrewKimball requested a review from a team as a code owner February 23, 2023 09:23
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Member

@yuzefovich yuzefovich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice find! :lgtm: Seems worthy of a backport, WDYT?

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @DrewKimball)

During planning for a render node, the physical planning logic checks
whether the last created processor rendered its own expressions, adds its
render expressions to the processor if not. The check is necessary to handle
the case when expressions in a parent render reference those from a child
render.

However, render nodes also handle projecting input columns: both removing
them and reordering them. Correct planning of the processors depends on the
columns at each step being in a particular order. Since physical planning
didn't check whether the existing processor projected its columns in some
way, the parent render could be combined with its child. This could lead
to panics in the parent render expressions when the columns weren't projected
as expected. This patch fixes the issue by adding the projection check
before allowing the render planning code to add to the previous processor.

Fixes cockroachdb#95633

Release note (bug fix): Fixed a rare bug existing since before 22.1 that
could cause a projected expression to replace column references with the
wrong values.
@DrewKimball
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Seems worthy of a backport, WDYT?

Good point, I'll add labels.

@DrewKimball
Copy link
Collaborator Author

TFTR!

bors r+

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Feb 23, 2023

Build succeeded:

@blathers-crl
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Feb 23, 2023

Encountered an error creating backports. Some common things that can go wrong:

  1. The backport branch might have already existed.
  2. There was a merge conflict.
  3. The backport branch contained merge commits.

You might need to create your backport manually using the backport tool.


error creating merge commit from 7672be3 to blathers/backport-release-22.1-97554: POST https://api.github.com/repos/cockroachdb/cockroach/merges: 409 Merge conflict []

you may need to manually resolve merge conflicts with the backport tool.

Backport to branch 22.1.x failed. See errors above.


🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is dev-inf.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

sql: recent regression on planning comparisons
3 participants