Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-22.1: opt: add support for NULLS LAST with DISTINCT ON #93608

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2022

Conversation

blathers-crl[bot]
Copy link

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot commented Dec 14, 2022

Backport 1/1 commits from #93567 on behalf of @rytaft.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


This commit adds an exception for the requirement that the ORDER BY clause of a DISTINCT ON query must contain only columns in the ON clause. Specifically, it allows expressions of the form col IS NULL, where col is one of the ON columns. This is needed to support NULLS LAST, since we implement NULLS LAST by synthesizing a col IS NULL ordering column.

The approach feels a bit hacky, but it seems like the smallest, lowest risk option available.

Fixes #90763

Release note (bug fix): Fixed an issue where DISTINCT ON queries would fail with the error "SELECT DISTINCT ON expressions must match initial ORDER BY expressions" when the query included an ORDER BY clause containing ASC NULLS LAST or DESC NULLS FIRST.


Release justification: Low-risk bug fix.

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 14, 2022 15:35
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-22.1-93567 branch from 34fbc2f to 62dac05 Compare December 14, 2022 15:35
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested review from michae2 and msirek December 14, 2022 15:35
@blathers-crl
Copy link
Author

blathers-crl bot commented Dec 14, 2022

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Patches should only be created for serious issues or test-only changes.
  • Patches should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Patches should change as little code as possible.
  • Patches should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Patches should not add new functionality.
  • Patches must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
If some of the basic criteria cannot be satisfied, ensure that the exceptional criteria are satisfied within.
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters.
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.

Add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this backport.

Some other things to consider:

  • What did we do to ensure that a user that doesn’t know & care about this backport, has no idea that it happened?
  • Will this work in a cluster of mixed patch versions? Did we test that?
  • If a user upgrades a patch version, uses this feature, and then downgrades, what happens?

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from rytaft December 14, 2022 15:35
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. labels Dec 14, 2022
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@renatolabs
Copy link
Contributor

Let's hold off on merging this backport until #93719 is fixed.

Copy link
Contributor

@msirek msirek left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @michae2 and @rytaft)

@rytaft rytaft force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-22.1-93567 branch from fb5d660 to 50a7cb1 Compare December 15, 2022 22:28
This commit adds an exception for the requirement that the ORDER
BY clause of a DISTINCT ON query must contain only columns in the
ON clause. Specifically, it allows expressions of the form
`col IS NULL`, where col is one of the ON columns. This is needed
to support NULLS LAST, since we implement NULLS LAST by synthesizing
a `col IS NULL` ordering column.

The approach feels a bit hacky, but it seems like the smallest,
lowest risk option available.

Fixes #90763

Release note (bug fix): Fixed an issue where DISTINCT ON queries
would fail with the error "SELECT DISTINCT ON expressions must
match initial ORDER BY expressions" when the query included an
ORDER BY clause containing ASC NULLS LAST or DESC NULLS FIRST.
@rytaft rytaft force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-22.1-93567 branch from 50a7cb1 to ce7c5c0 Compare December 15, 2022 22:30
@rytaft rytaft merged commit ef071fb into release-22.1 Dec 16, 2022
@rytaft rytaft deleted the blathers/backport-release-22.1-93567 branch December 16, 2022 01:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants