-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
lint: remove Golint #91534
lint: remove Golint #91534
Conversation
Some discussion here. |
7e182ad
to
906fa89
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good riddance! :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice
906fa89
to
e865b69
Compare
Looks like no one is relying on TFTRs! bors r+ |
I think there is a merge conflict with an in-flight #91616, so I'll let that change go in first. bors r- |
Canceled. |
This commit removes `TestGolint` linter as well as all mentions of `golint` I could find. The rationale is that - the linter is no longer maintained - is partially duplicated with the `staticcheck` - due to a recent change in `gcexportdata.Find`, if we bump some dependencies, it takes on the order of an hour when run via bazel, and we'd need to fork `golint` to go around that. Epic: None Release note: None
e865b69
to
f00ca3c
Compare
bors r+ |
Build succeeded: |
This commit removes
TestGolint
linter as well as all mentions ofgolint
I could find. The rationale is thatstaticcheck
gcexportdata.Find
, if we bump some dependencies, it takes on the order of an hour when run via bazel, and we'd need to forkgolint
to go around that.Epic: None
Release note: None