Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-21.2: storage: override MVCCMetadata.TxnDidNotUpdateMeta in mixed version c… #70381

Closed

Conversation

blathers-crl[bot]
Copy link

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot commented Sep 17, 2021

Backport 1/1 commits from #70267 on behalf of @sumeerbhola.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


…luster

Specifically, if the cluster version indicates that there can
be nodes with the broken SingleDelete logic for separated
intent resolution, the MVCCMetadata.TxnDidNotUpdateMeta
field will never be set to true.

See code comments and #69891 (comment)

Informs #69891

Release justification: fix for a release blocker that causes incorrect
behavior for transactional writes.

Release note: None


Release justification:

…luster

Specifically, if the cluster version indicates that there can
be nodes with the broken SingleDelete logic for separated
intent resolution, the MVCCMetadata.TxnDidNotUpdateMeta
field will never be set to true.

See code comments and #69891 (comment)

Informs #69891

Release justification: fix for a release blocker that causes incorrect
behavior for transactional writes.

Release note: None
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from a team September 17, 2021 22:46
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested review from a team as code owners September 17, 2021 22:46
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested review from adityamaru and removed request for a team September 17, 2021 22:46
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-21.2-70267 branch from 127652b to 21f4eed Compare September 17, 2021 22:46
@blathers-crl
Copy link
Author

blathers-crl bot commented Sep 17, 2021

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Patches should only be created for serious issues.
  • Patches should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Patches should change as little code as possible.
  • Patches should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Patches should not add new functionality.
  • Patches must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
If some of the basic criteria cannot be satisfied, ensure that the exceptional criteria are satisfied within.
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters.
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.

Add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this backport.

Some other things to consider:

  • What did we do to ensure that a user that doesn’t know & care about this backport, has no idea that it happened?
  • Will this work in a cluster of mixed patch versions? Did we test that?
  • If a user upgrades a patch version, uses this feature, and then downgrades, what happens?

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@sumeerbhola
Copy link
Collaborator

The backport fails tests because the printing of MVCCMetadata was changed in #69809, which has not been backported. I will send out a manual backport that includes a tiny change in TestMVCCHistories that adds that printing change.

@rafiss rafiss deleted the blathers/backport-release-21.2-70267 branch November 22, 2021 06:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants