Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

roachtest: Shrink scrub workloads #37046

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2019
Merged

Conversation

bdarnell
Copy link
Contributor

The scrub roachtest was previously running tpcc-1000 on a cluster of
12 total vcpus, which is not enough (it needs ~double that). This
exposed a lot of interesting issues like #35986, but it's only
incidental to the main purpose of this test (and it's also flaky due
to uninteresting problems associated with overloading).

Switch the test to tpcc-100 so it can be stable; we'll reintroduce a
test dedicated to overload conditions in the future (when we can make
it stable).

Fixes #35985
Fixes #37017

Release note: None

The scrub roachtest was previously running tpcc-1000 on a cluster of
12 total vcpus, which is not enough (it needs ~double that). This
exposed a lot of interesting issues like cockroachdb#35986, but it's only
incidental to the main purpose of this test (and it's also flaky due
to uninteresting problems associated with overloading).

Switch the test to tpcc-100 so it can be stable; we'll reintroduce a
test dedicated to overload conditions in the future (when we can make
it stable).

Fixes cockroachdb#35985
Fixes cockroachdb#37017

Release note: None
@bdarnell bdarnell requested a review from thoszhang April 23, 2019 20:01
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@bdarnell
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r=lucy-zhang

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Apr 23, 2019

Build failed

@bdarnell
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r=lucy-zhang

Flaked on #36812

craig bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2019
37046: roachtest: Shrink scrub workloads r=lucy-zhang a=bdarnell

The scrub roachtest was previously running tpcc-1000 on a cluster of
12 total vcpus, which is not enough (it needs ~double that). This
exposed a lot of interesting issues like #35986, but it's only
incidental to the main purpose of this test (and it's also flaky due
to uninteresting problems associated with overloading).

Switch the test to tpcc-100 so it can be stable; we'll reintroduce a
test dedicated to overload conditions in the future (when we can make
it stable).

Fixes #35985
Fixes #37017

Release note: None

Co-authored-by: Ben Darnell <[email protected]>
@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Apr 23, 2019

Build succeeded

@craig craig bot merged commit bed9daa into cockroachdb:master Apr 23, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

roachtest: scrub/all-checks/tpcc/w=1000 failed roachtest: scrub/index-only/tpcc/w=1000 failed
3 participants