-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sql: unreserve the STORED keyword #24554
Conversation
Are we sure LATERAL doesn't need to be a reserved word? It isn't even used by the grammar right now, but it will be when we support LATERAL JOINS (possibly happening in 2.1). Review status: 0 of 2 files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved, all commit checks successful. Comments from Reviewable |
Yeah, |
Release note (sql change): the word `stored` can again be used to name databases, tables or columns without requiring clients to quote the identifier.
amended to only unreserve STORED. bors r+ |
24554: sql: unreserve the STORED keyword r=knz a=jordanlewis Release note (sql change): the word `stored` can again be used to name databases, tables or columns without requiring clients to quote the identifier. Co-authored-by: Jordan Lewis <[email protected]>
Build succeeded |
24864: cherry-pick 2.0: sql: unreserve the STORED keyword r=knz a=knz Picks #24554. cc @cockroachdb/release Co-authored-by: Jordan Lewis <[email protected]>
Release note (sql change): the word
stored
can again be used to namedatabases, tables or columns without requiring clients to quote the
identifier.