Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-24.3: logictest: use high priority txn in partial_index and synthetic_privileges tests #133408

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

blathers-crl[bot]
Copy link

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Backport 1/1 commits from #133400 on behalf of @rafiss.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


This should make it less likely for the transaction to be aborted.

fixes #126763
fixes #132919
Release note: None


Release justification: test only change

…leges tests

This should make it less likely for the transaction to be aborted.

Release note: None
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-24.3-133400 branch from 603a4b9 to cd66797 Compare October 24, 2024 21:23
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. labels Oct 24, 2024
Copy link
Author

blathers-crl bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Backports should only be created for serious
    issues
    or test-only changes.
  • Backports should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Backports should change as little code as possible.
  • Backports should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Backports should not add new functionality (except as defined
    here).
  • Backports must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
  • All backports must be reviewed by the owning areas TL. For more information as to how that review should be conducted, please consult the backport
    policy
    .
If your backport adds new functionality, please ensure that the following additional criteria are satisfied:
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters. State changes must be further protected such that nodes running old binaries will not be negatively impacted by the new state (with a mixed version test added).
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.
  • Your backport must be accompanied by a post to the appropriate Slack
    channel (#db-backports-point-releases or #db-backports-XX-X-release) for awareness and discussion.

Also, please add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this
backport.

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added the backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches label Oct 24, 2024
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from Dedej-Bergin October 24, 2024 21:23
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Contributor

@Dedej-Bergin Dedej-Bergin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @rafiss)

@rafiss rafiss merged commit 3bf40c2 into release-24.3 Oct 25, 2024
19 of 21 checks passed
@rafiss rafiss deleted the blathers/backport-release-24.3-133400 branch October 25, 2024 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants