Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-23.2: kvserver: refresh range cache on rangefeed barrier failure #119546

Closed

Conversation

blathers-crl[bot]
Copy link

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot commented Feb 22, 2024

Backport 1/1 commits from #119512 on behalf of @erikgrinaker.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


The DistSender does not refresh its range cache for unsplittable requests. This could cause a rangefeed transaction pusher barrier request to persistently fail following a range merge if the range cache thought the barrier spanned multiple ranges. This would only resolve once the range cache was refreshed by some other request, which might never happen. This in turn would cause the rangefeed's resolved timestamp to stall.

Resolves #119536.
Resolves #119333.
Epic: none
Release note (bug fix): fixed a bug where rangefeed resolved timestamps could get stuck, continually emitting the log message "pushing old intents failed: range barrier failed, range split", typically following a range merge.


Release justification:

The DistSender does not refresh its range cache for unsplittable
requests. This could cause a rangefeed transaction pusher barrier
request to persistently fail following a range merge if the range cache
thought the barrier spanned multiple ranges. This would only resolve
once the range cache was refreshed by some other request, which might
never happen. This in turn would cause the rangefeed's resolved
timestamp to stall.

Epic: none
Release note (bug fix): fixed a bug where rangefeed resolved timestamps
could get stuck, continually emitting the log message "pushing old
intents failed: range barrier failed, range split", typically following
a range merge.
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from a team February 22, 2024 22:02
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 22, 2024 22:02
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-23.2-119512 branch from 8b4f663 to 9ac9980 Compare February 22, 2024 22:02
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. labels Feb 22, 2024
Copy link
Author

blathers-crl bot commented Feb 22, 2024

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Backports should only be created for serious
    issues
    or test-only changes.
  • Backports should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Backports should change as little code as possible.
  • Backports should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Backports should not add new functionality (except as defined
    here).
  • Backports must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
  • All backports must be reviewed by the owning areas TL and one additional
    TL. For more information as to how that review should be conducted, please consult the backport
    policy
    .
If your backport adds new functionality, please ensure that the following additional criteria are satisfied:
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters. State changes must be further protected such that nodes running old binaries will not be negatively impacted by the new state (with a mixed version test added).
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.
  • Your backport must be accompanied by a post to the appropriate Slack
    channel (#db-backports-point-releases or #db-backports-XX-X-release) for awareness and discussion.

Also, please add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this
backport.

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added the backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches label Feb 22, 2024
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@erikgrinaker
Copy link
Contributor

See #119541.

@mgartner mgartner deleted the blathers/backport-release-23.2-119512 branch May 2, 2024 16:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants