Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-22.2: batcheval: add BarrierRequest.WithLeaseAppliedIndex #118474

Conversation

erikgrinaker
Copy link
Contributor

The behavior of Barrier differs between 22.2 and 23.1: the latter does not conflict with ongoing read requests, most likely because they drop latches before evaluation in 23.1. It does not seem particularly problematic that 22.2 has to wait for reads to complete, at least not for our purposes here, so I've just documented this and disabled the test coverage for read conflicts.

There were also significant kvnemesis changes in 23.1, so the kvnemesis testing needed some adjustments.


Backport:

Please see individual PRs for details.

Release justification: prerequisites for backporting #117612.

/cc @cockroachdb/release

Otherwise, `BatchRequest.RequiresConsensus()` may return `false` and not
submit the barrier through Raft. Similarly,
`shouldWaitOnLatchesWithoutAcquiring` will return `false` so it will
contend with later writes.

Barriers are not used in recent releases, so this does not have any
mixed-version concerns.

Epic: none
Release note: None
This can be used to detect whether a replica has applied the barrier
command yet.

Epic: none
Release note: None
This only executes random `Barrier` requests, but does not verify that
the barrier guarantees are actually satisfied (i.e. that all past and
concurrent writes are applied before it returns). At least we get some
execution coverage, and verify that it does not have negative
interactions with other operations.

Epic: none
Release note: None
This allows a caller to wait for a replica to reach a certain lease
applied index. Similar functionality elsewhere is not migrated yet, out
of caution.

Epic: none
Release note: None
@erikgrinaker erikgrinaker self-assigned this Jan 30, 2024
@erikgrinaker erikgrinaker requested a review from a team as a code owner January 30, 2024 14:36
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Jan 30, 2024

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Backports should only be created for serious
    issues
    or test-only changes.
  • Backports should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Backports should change as little code as possible.
  • Backports should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Backports should not add new functionality (except as defined
    here).
  • Backports must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
  • All backports must be reviewed by the owning areas TL and one additional
    TL. For more information as to how that review should be conducted, please consult the backport
    policy
    .
If your backport adds new functionality, please ensure that the following additional criteria are satisfied:
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters. State changes must be further protected such that nodes running old binaries will not be negatively impacted by the new state (with a mixed version test added).
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.
  • Your backport must be accompanied by a post to the appropriate Slack
    channel (#db-backports-point-releases or #db-backports-XX-X-release) for awareness and discussion.

Also, please add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this
backport.

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added the backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches label Jan 30, 2024
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@erikgrinaker erikgrinaker merged commit 951db2c into cockroachdb:release-22.2 Feb 1, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@erikgrinaker
Copy link
Contributor Author

blathers backport staging-v22.2.18

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants