Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

storage: add UnsafeLazyValue to EngineIterator interface #110281

Merged

Conversation

nvanbenschoten
Copy link
Member

@nvanbenschoten nvanbenschoten commented Sep 8, 2023

All implementations of the interface except spanset.EngineIterator already implement the method.

Epic: None
Release note: None

@blathers-crl
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Sep 8, 2023

It looks like your PR touches production code but doesn't add or edit any test code. Did you consider adding tests to your PR?

🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is dev-inf.

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

All implementations of the interface except `spanset.EngineIterator`
already implement the method.

Epic: None
Release note: None
@nvanbenschoten nvanbenschoten force-pushed the nvanbenschoten/lazyValueEngingeIter branch from ff52826 to 51c96d4 Compare September 8, 2023 20:20
Copy link
Collaborator

@sumeerbhola sumeerbhola left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 3 of 3 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @nvanbenschoten)

@nvanbenschoten
Copy link
Member Author

TFTR!

bors r+

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 8, 2023

Build succeeded:

@craig craig bot merged commit 52f0a7e into cockroachdb:master Sep 8, 2023
@nvanbenschoten nvanbenschoten deleted the nvanbenschoten/lazyValueEngingeIter branch September 10, 2023 16:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants