-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
release: 20.2.0-alpha.2 #51035
Comments
Hi @celiala, please add a C-ategory label to your issue. Check out the label system docs. While you're here, please consider adding an A- label to help keep our repository tidy. 🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is otan. |
🚫 Deprecated (from older candidate SHA) 🚫🚫 Roachtest Nightly - GCE(Tests failed: 27 (8 new), passed: 245, ignored: 18) 🚫 Failures: 🚫 [appdev]
🚫 [bulkio]
🚫 [kv]
🚫 [sql-exec]
🚫 [sql-schema]
🚫 Random Syntax TestsFailures: 🚫 [sql-exec]
🚫 SQLite Logic Test High VModule Nightly
|
All of the schemachange test failures seem to be due to a timeout in the data import. |
Checked off the KV failures. We're actively working on
There are a bunch of other "KV roachtests" that are failing due to wedged imports. I've reallocated them to bulk IO for investigation (I've assigned a bunch to @dt). |
Signed off on AppDev. Django and psycopg failures were because of parsing logic in the test that has since been fixed. PGJDBC has some flaky tests that we are figuring out how to ignore or stabilize. |
Checking off the two |
Signing off on the SQLSmith failures. Opened some issues to track the individual failures but they shouldn't block the release. |
The scrub failures have timed out due to the same reasons as the schemachange tests. |
Roachtest Nightly - GCE(Tests failed: 24 (5 new), passed: 249, ignored: 19) [appdev]
[bulkio]
[kv]
[partitioning]
[storage]Random Syntax Tests[sql-exec]
Other tests
|
The " gossip/chaos/nodes=9 | [kv]" failure is #51721. I believe it denotes a real bug but it's not new. I would tend to think it shouldn't block the release. @nvanbenschoten @andreimatei what do you think? |
Signed off on appdev tests. They aren't new problems. |
|
We see that nodes are getting different IDs from their roachprod IDs (see #51721 (comment)). It's unclear whether this is a regression inside cockroach or outside cockroach. We'll need to figure that out before we make a determination on whether this is a blocker or not. |
It's not, that's me again. #51497 (comment), fixed by #51790. |
Signed off the rest of the KV tests. The follower reads roachtest has been flaky for some time now, and still under investigation (so we shouldn't hold the release up). The autoupgrade test is another victim of |
Signed off on |
Candidate SHA:
d3119926d33d808c6384cf3e99a7f7435f395489
(d311992)Tag:
provisional_202007220233_v20.2.0-alpha.2
Deployment status: Qualifying
Qualification Suite: (passed ✅) Tests passed: 1, ignored: 291
Nightly Suite: (completed ✅) Tests failed: 24 (5 new), passed: 249, ignored: 19
Admin UI for Qualification Clusters:
Release process checklist
Prep date: Mon 7/27
Thur 7/16, Thur 7/9, Mon 7/6(usually a week before the release)Candidate SHA
aboveRelease Qualification
One day after prep date:
Get signoff on roachtest failures
Keep an eye on clusters until release date. Do not proceed below until the release date.
Release date:
WIP fill in date: usually Monday WIP
Check cluster status
Tag release
Bless provisional binaries
If applicable, update the map that roachtests use to map a version to a previous version, to reference the newly tagged version
For production or stable releases in the latest major release series
For production or stable releases
Update docs
External communications for release
Cleanup:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: