raft: test TestCannotCommitWithoutNewTermEntry w/ & wo/ store liveness

This commit changes TestCannotCommitWithoutNewTermEntry to allow testing
it when store liveness is both enabled and disabled.

pkg/raft/raft_test.go

@@ -676,39 +676,59 @@ func TestSingleNodeCommit(t *testing.T) {
 // when leader changes, no new proposal comes in and ChangeTerm proposal is
 // filtered.
 func TestCannotCommitWithoutNewTermEntry(t *testing.T) {
-	tt := newNetworkWithConfig(fortificationDisabledConfig, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil)
-	tt.send(pb.Message{From: 1, To: 1, Type: pb.MsgHup})
+	var tt *network
+	testutils.RunTrueAndFalse(t, "store-liveness-enabled",
+		func(t *testing.T, storeLivenessEnabled bool) {
 
-	// 0 cannot reach 2,3,4
-	tt.cut(1, 3)
-	tt.cut(1, 4)
-	tt.cut(1, 5)
+			if storeLivenessEnabled {
+				tt = newNetwork(nil, nil, nil, nil, nil)
+			} else {
+				tt = newNetworkWithConfig(fortificationDisabledConfig, nil, nil, nil, nil, nil)
+			}
 
-	tt.send(pb.Message{From: 1, To: 1, Type: pb.MsgProp, Entries: []pb.Entry{{Data: []byte("some data")}}})
-	tt.send(pb.Message{From: 1, To: 1, Type: pb.MsgProp, Entries: []pb.Entry{{Data: []byte("some data")}}})
+			tt.send(pb.Message{From: 1, To: 1, Type: pb.MsgHup})
 
-	sm := tt.peers[1].(*raft)
-	assert.Equal(t, uint64(1), sm.raftLog.committed)
+			// 0 cannot reach 2,3,4
+			tt.cut(1, 3)
+			tt.cut(1, 4)
+			tt.cut(1, 5)
 
-	// network recovery
-	tt.recover()
-	// avoid committing ChangeTerm proposal
-	tt.ignore(pb.MsgApp)
+			tt.send(pb.Message{From: 1, To: 1, Type: pb.MsgProp, Entries: []pb.Entry{{Data: []byte("some data")}}})
+			tt.send(pb.Message{From: 1, To: 1, Type: pb.MsgProp, Entries: []pb.Entry{{Data: []byte("some data")}}})
 
-	// elect 2 as the new leader with term 2
-	tt.send(pb.Message{From: 2, To: 2, Type: pb.MsgHup})
+			sm := tt.peers[1].(*raft)
+			assert.Equal(t, uint64(1), sm.raftLog.committed)
 
-	// no log entries from previous term should be committed
-	sm = tt.peers[2].(*raft)
-	assert.Equal(t, uint64(1), sm.raftLog.committed)
+			// network recovery
+			tt.recover()
+			// avoid committing ChangeTerm proposal
+			tt.ignore(pb.MsgApp)
 
-	tt.recover()
-	// send heartbeat; reset wait
-	tt.send(pb.Message{From: 2, To: 2, Type: pb.MsgBeat})
-	// append an entry at current term
-	tt.send(pb.Message{From: 2, To: 2, Type: pb.MsgProp, Entries: []pb.Entry{{Data: []byte("some data")}}})
-	// expect the committed to be advanced
-	assert.Equal(t, uint64(5), sm.raftLog.committed)
+			// elect 2 as the new leader with term 2
+			if storeLivenessEnabled {
+				// We need peers to withdraw their support for the current leader so
+				// that a new leader can be elected.
+				tt.withdrawSupportAllPeers()
+			}
+			tt.send(pb.Message{From: 2, To: 2, Type: pb.MsgHup})
+
+			if storeLivenessEnabled {
+				// Now that a new leader is elected, we can grant support to all peers.
+				tt.grantSupportAllPeers()
+			}
+
+			// no log entries from previous term should be committed
+			sm = tt.peers[2].(*raft)
+			assert.Equal(t, uint64(1), sm.raftLog.committed)
+
+			tt.recover()
+			// send heartbeat; reset wait
+			tt.send(pb.Message{From: 2, To: 2, Type: pb.MsgBeat})
+			// append an entry at current term
+			tt.send(pb.Message{From: 2, To: 2, Type: pb.MsgProp, Entries: []pb.Entry{{Data: []byte("some data")}}})
+			// expect the committed to be advanced
+			assert.Equal(t, uint64(5), sm.raftLog.committed)
+		})
 }
 
 // TestCommitWithoutNewTermEntry tests the entries could be committed