-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
custom nano configuration and test [Backport] #44428
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @vlimant for CMSSW_14_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@fabiocos, @antoniovilela, @srimanob, @davidlange6, @vlimant, @subirsarkar, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee, @miquork, @rappoccio, @cmsbuild, @hqucms can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
cms-bot internal usage |
enable nano |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-NANO RelVals-INPUT
RelVals-NANO
Comparison SummaryThe workflows 2500.4 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
|
Pull request #44428 was updated. @davidlange6, @cmsbuild, @vlimant, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @sunilUIET, @hqucms, @antoniovilela, @fabiocos, @subirsarkar, @rappoccio, @miquork can you please check and sign again. |
we'll have to deal with #44383 and the |
please test |
@rbhattacharya04 is the change to custom_muon_cff.py acceptable ? |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-00c89b/38184/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 2500.4 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
NANO Comparison SummaryThe workflows 2500.4 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
Pull request #44428 was updated. @sunilUIET, @subirsarkar, @miquork, @davidlange6, @cmsbuild, @fabiocos, @vlimant, @hqucms, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @srimanob, @AdrianoDee can you please check and sign again. |
included also the fix #44464 |
please test |
I might add HCAL in the mix ( #43961 ) |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-00c89b/38277/summary.html Comparison SummaryThe workflows 2500.4 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
NANO Comparison SummaryThe workflows 2500.4 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons Summary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+pdmv |
+Upgrade |
@cms-sw/orp-l2 : as this PR does not change content, but only how we get to configure flavors of NANO, for the purpose of harmonized production configuration, can you please merge this in ? |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged. |
PR description:
backporting #44263 #44425 #44399 #44087 to 14.0.X, mostly for Tier0 purpose
PR validation:
nano matrix