Run3 era for 2024 pp reference and UPC reco

[stahlleiton]

PR description:

This PR implements a first version of the Run 3 eras for the 2024 pp reference (at 5.36 TeV) and PbPb UPC reconstruction.

@mandrenguyen

PR validation:

Validated using a minbias sample.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44316/39336

• This PR adds an extra 40KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/StandardSequences/python/Eras.py modified in PR(s): Add run3 tracking low pu era #33532, add Era_Run3_2024, Era_Run3_2025, Tier0 reco scenario for 2024, and change default era in PyReleaseValidation #43761

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @stahlleiton for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/Eras (operations)
• Configuration/StandardSequences (operations)
• PhysicsTools/PatAlgos (reconstruction, xpog)
• RecoJets/Configuration (reconstruction)

@antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @vlimant, @fabiocos, @hqucms, @mandrenguyen, @davidlange6, @jfernan2, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@demuller, @JanFSchulte, @AlexDeMoor, @AnnikaStein, @Ming-Yan, @mmarionncern, @andrzejnovak, @makortel, @nhanvtran, @seemasharmafnal, @mariadalfonso, @azotz, @dgulhan, @mtosi, @VinInn, @VourMa, @gkasieczka, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @felicepantaleo, @clelange, @rovere, @hatakeyamak, @jdamgov, @Martin-Grunewald, @rappoccio, @schoef, @fabiocos, @ahinzmann, @mbluj, @missirol, @Senphy, @gouskos, @mmusich, @gpetruc, @emilbols, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @slomeo, @sameasy, @jdolen this is something you requested to watch as well.
@sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mandrenguyen]

@stahlleiton Normally we add a relVal workflow for testing. Do you want to give it a shot?
Can you list the cmsDriver commands you used for testing?
I recall that conditions were required for the low pT photon code.
Which GT were you using?

[stahlleiton]

For the UPC, the only change was to modify the base era from Run3_2023 to Run3, and I tested it on 13_2_X. To test it in 14_1_X, a new GT will be needed (I can try to request one and add a MC relval for 14_1_X)

[stahlleiton]

Implemented 4 relval MC workflows:

• 149.1: 2024 pp ref
• 180: 2023 Pythia8 gamma-nucleus
• 180.1: 2023 Starlight double diffraction
• 181: 2024 Pythia8 gamma-nucleus

The Pythia8 gamma-nucleus workflows needs the fix implemented in #44264

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44316/39351

• This PR adds an extra 112KB to repository

• There are other open Pull requests which might conflict with changes you have proposed:

  • File Configuration/StandardSequences/python/Eras.py modified in PR(s): Add run3 tracking low pu era #33532, add Era_Run3_2024, Era_Run3_2025, Tier0 reco scenario for 2024, and change default era in PyReleaseValidation #43761

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #44316 was updated. @vlimant, @jfernan2, @menglu21, @antoniovilela, @subirsarkar, @GurpreetSinghChahal, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @bbilin, @SiewYan, @fabiocos, @cmsbuild, @srimanob, @davidlange6, @mkirsano, @hqucms, @AdrianoDee, @sunilUIET, @miquork, @alberto-sanchez can you please check and sign again.

[AdrianoDee]

test parameters:

• workflows = 149.1, 180, 180.1, 181

[AdrianoDee]

please test

[srimanob]

+Upgrade

[stahlleiton]

@bbilin and @menglu21 : please review/sign this PR

[menglu21]

+1

[antoniovilela]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

[makortel]

Workflow 180.1 fails in IBs, see #44536

[stahlleiton]

Ok. I will try to update the gridpack of starlight. In the meantime, I will make a PR removing this workflow.

[stahlleiton]

Workflow 180.1 fails in IBs, see #44536

workflow disabled in #44540