Add ntuplization code for sagitta-bias studies to Alignment/OfflineValidation

[mmusich]

PR description:

The goal of this PR is to add to the Alignment/OfflineValidation package a simple ntuplization code to do "sagitta bias" weak mode studies at CMS using di-muon resonant decays data as the ones in this set of slides.
The tool is not interlaced yet in the all-in-one meta-data tool, but might be included at a later time.
I have added the new analyzer to the standard battery of unit tests.

PR validation:

Run extensive private tests, also run successfully:

• scram b runtests_Miscellanea
• scram b runtests_testTrackAnalysis

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, but will be backported to CMSSW_14_0_X for 2024 data-taking operations

[cmsbuild]

cms-bot internal usage

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44282/39303

• This PR adds an extra 32KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Alignment/OfflineValidation (alca)

@saumyaphor4252, @consuegs, @cmsbuild, @perrotta can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@rsreds, @yuanchao, @tlampen, @tocheng, @adewit, @mmusich this is something you requested to watch as well.
@sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-518944/37871/summary.html
COMMIT: 6fdc048
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-03-03-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/44282/37871/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 20 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 53 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3338784
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 6
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3338756
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 205 log files, 166 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44282/39316

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #44282 was updated. @perrotta, @saumyaphor4252, @consuegs, @cmsbuild can you please check and sign again.

[mmusich]

@cmsbuild, please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-518944/37877/summary.html
COMMIT: 34dbd06
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-03-03-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/44282/37877/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 18 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 63 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3338784
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1358
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3337404
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 205 log files, 166 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[perrotta]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[rappoccio]

+1