[13_1_X] update relval matrix to add WFs for 2022E era

[sunilUIET]

This PR adds 140.071-140.078 WFs for release validation that use 2022 era E data.

This is a backport of PR #41664

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @sunilUIET (sunil bansal) for CMSSW_13_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/PyReleaseValidation (pdmv, upgrade)

@bbilin, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @kskovpen, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@makortel, @kpedro88, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @fabiocos, @slomeo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from [13_2_X] update relval matrix to add WFs for 2022E era #41664

[sunilUIET]

test parameters:

workflows = 140.071,140.072,140.073,140.074,140.075,140.076,140.077,140.078
relvals_opt = -w standard

[sunilUIET]

please test

[perrotta]

backport of #41664

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-5242f9/32719/summary.html
COMMIT: 53db94e
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-05-18-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/41729/32719/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially added 9 lines to the logs
• Reco comparison results: 15 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3222422
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 12
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3222388
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[perrotta]

+1

• @sunilUIET you wrote this PR and alredy signed both its master version and the 13_0_X backport. Therefore I imagine you have nothing against merging this also in the intermediate 13_1_X.

[perrotta]

• @sunilUIET you wrote this PR and alredy signed both its master version and the 13_0_X backport. Therefore I imagine you have nothing against merging this also in the intermediate 13_1_X.

The same holds for @cms-sw/upgrade-l2 , I suppose: let merge it now, then

[perrotta]

merge