[12_4_X] simple RECO squence for SPLASH runs

[pmandrik]

PR description:

For the beam SPLASH runs simplification of RECO sequence is proposed in order to speed up event processing in Event Display DQM clients. As simplified sequence is needed only for SPLASH runs, not for regular 'cosmic' and 'beam operation', the customization in visualizationProcessing function is applied when beamSplashRun option is True.

PR validation:

Tested locally, backport is to be tested at P5 in production using on-going runs.

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37624/29393

• This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @pmandrik for master.

It involves the following packages:

• Configuration/DataProcessing (operations)
• DQM/Integration (dqm)

@perrotta, @pmandrik, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @qliphy, @rvenditti, @micsucmed, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@batinkov, @battibass, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @threus, @fabiocos, @francescobrivio this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @qliphy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[jfernan2]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37624/29396

• This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #37624 was updated. @perrotta, @pmandrik, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @qliphy, @rvenditti, @micsucmed, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[jfernan2]

please test

[cmsbuild]

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-42ff51/24037/summary.html
COMMIT: bcda02b
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-04-19-2300/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/37624/24037/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test TestDQMOnlineClient-l1tstage2_dqm_sourceclient had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3589937
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3589913
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
• Checked 200 log files, 45 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-37624/29838

• This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

Pull request #37624 was updated. @perrotta, @pmandrik, @emanueleusai, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @qliphy, @rvenditti, @micsucmed, @fabiocos, @davidlange6 can you please check and sign again.

[perrotta]

please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-42ff51/24548/summary.html
COMMIT: 7a55b8e
CMSSW: CMSSW_12_4_X_2022-05-09-1100/slc7_amd64_gcc10
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/37624/24548/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 6 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3696633
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 14
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3696597
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 206 log files, 45 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[emanueleusai]

+1

[perrotta]

+1

• Sequence for splashes made available for possible future such runs

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will be automatically merged.

[davidlange6]

Right - it was for the event interpretation sequence as I understand it..

…

On Apr 24, 2022, at 6:45 PM, pmandrik ***@***.***> wrote: eiStep variable was already here, but maybe I can just rename it following you proposal and [0] discussion? [0] #32643 — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.