Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Append new lines to end of json files before writing #849

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 14, 2024

Conversation

joshAtRula
Copy link
Contributor

@joshAtRula joshAtRula commented Dec 12, 2024

what

It's common for linters and pre-commit hooks to expect new lines at the end of files.
In the case of the pretty-printed json (used for the creation of the backend.tf.json files) these objects are now properly indented, but still lacking the new line at the end of the file.

This PR addresses this by checking that the file is either empty OR that the last object by length isn't already a new line, and appends it.

why

Better support for linting and pre-comming standards.

references

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Ensured that JSON files written by the application now properly end with a newline character for improved formatting.

@joshAtRula joshAtRula requested review from a team as code owners December 12, 2024 20:17
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes involve a modification to the WriteToFileAsJSON function in the pkg/utils/json_utils.go file. A new constant newlineByte has been introduced, and a check is now performed to ensure that the indentedJSON byte slice ends with a newline character before writing it to a file. If the indentedJSON is empty or does not end with a newline, a newline character is appended. No other functions or public entity declarations were affected.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
pkg/utils/json_utils.go Modified WriteToFileAsJSON to check if the JSON content ends with a newline and append if not.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

patch

Suggested reviewers

  • kevcube
  • nitrocode
  • aknysh

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. This feature will be included in our Pro Plan when released.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6fcb50d and b9b9d1f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/utils/json_utils.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • pkg/utils/json_utils.go

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary or @auto-summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @auto-title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
pkg/utils/json_utils.go (1)

54-58: LGTM! Clean implementation for newline handling.

The implementation correctly handles both empty files and existing content, ensuring JSON files end with a newline character. This aligns well with common Unix text file conventions and linter expectations.

Consider these minor readability improvements:

+const newlineByte = '\n'

 // Ensure that the JSON content ends with a newline
-if len(indentedJSON) == 0 || indentedJSON[len(indentedJSON)-1] != '\n' {
-    indentedJSON = append(indentedJSON, '\n')
+if len(indentedJSON) == 0 || indentedJSON[len(indentedJSON)-1] != newlineByte {
+    indentedJSON = append(indentedJSON, newlineByte)
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 22c9b28 and 6fcb50d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • pkg/utils/json_utils.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pkg/utils/json_utils.go (1)

54-58: Verify JSON parsing compatibility

The newline addition after valid JSON is spec-compliant, but let's verify this doesn't affect consumers.

✅ Verification successful

Adding a newline to JSON output is safe and spec-compliant

The codebase scan shows that all JSON parsing is done using Go's standard json.Unmarshal, which is tolerant of trailing whitespace including newlines. The change to append a newline character is safe because:

  • JSON specification allows optional whitespace (including newlines) after valid JSON
  • All JSON parsing in the codebase uses json.Unmarshal which handles trailing whitespace correctly
  • No custom JSON parsers or strict validation is used that would be affected
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for JSON parsing code in the codebase to verify compatibility
rg -l 'json\.(Unmarshal|Decode)' | while read -r file; do
  echo "=== $file ==="
  rg -A 3 'json\.(Unmarshal|Decode)' "$file"
done

Length of output: 1438

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 12, 2024
@osterman osterman requested review from aknysh and removed request for hans-d and joe-niland December 12, 2024 20:51
@aknysh aknysh added the no-release Do not create a new release (wait for additional code changes) label Dec 14, 2024
aknysh

This comment was marked as outdated.

Copy link
Member

@aknysh aknysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @joshAtRula

@aknysh aknysh merged commit 58b46f5 into cloudposse:main Dec 14, 2024
28 of 29 checks passed
Copy link

These changes were released in v1.126.0.

@joshAtRula joshAtRula deleted the append_newline_to_json_objects branch December 15, 2024 17:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-release Do not create a new release (wait for additional code changes)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants