Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose ExecuteDescribeComponent function in pkg to make it publicly accessible from other Go programs #801

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2024

Conversation

aknysh
Copy link
Member

@aknysh aknysh commented Nov 23, 2024

what

  • Expose ExecuteDescribeComponent function in pkg to make it publicly accessible from other Go programs

why

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced Atlantis integration with new configuration options and detailed setup instructions.
    • Introduced a method for describing component configurations within specified stacks.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated dependency versions to improve stability and performance.
  • Documentation

    • Significant updates to the Atlantis integration documentation for better clarity and usability.
  • Tests

    • Added new test coverage for the component description functionality.

@aknysh aknysh added the minor New features that do not break anything label Nov 23, 2024
@aknysh aknysh requested review from osterman, mcalhoun and Nuru November 23, 2024 00:03
@aknysh aknysh self-assigned this Nov 23, 2024
@aknysh aknysh requested review from a team as code owners November 23, 2024 00:03
@aknysh aknysh temporarily deployed to preview November 23, 2024 00:03 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 23, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request includes several updates across multiple files. The Dockerfile has been modified to update the ATMOS_VERSION from 1.105.0 to 1.109.0. The go.mod file reflects version upgrades for several dependencies, including bubbletea, hcl, x/term, and sync. A new file, describe_component.go, has been added to implement the ExecuteDescribeComponent function, accompanied by a new test case in describe_component_test.go. Lastly, the documentation for Atlantis integration has been significantly enhanced with new configuration options and clearer instructions.

Changes

File Change Summary
examples/quick-start-advanced/Dockerfile Updated ATMOS_VERSION from 1.105.0 to 1.109.0.
go.mod Updated dependency versions: bubbletea to v1.2.3, hcl to v2.23.0, x/term to v0.2.1, sync to v0.9.0.
pkg/describe/describe_component.go Added new function ExecuteDescribeComponent(component string, stack string, processTemplates bool) (map[string]any, error).
pkg/describe/describe_component_test.go Added new test function TestDescribeComponent7(t *testing.T) to test ExecuteDescribeComponent.
website/docs/integrations/atlantis.mdx Updated documentation for Atlantis integration, including new configuration options and clarifications.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • osterman: Suggested for review based on familiarity with the project and recent changes.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary or @auto-summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @auto-title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
pkg/describe/describe_component.go (1)

7-14: Consider enhancing the function documentation.

While the implementation is solid, the documentation could be more comprehensive to help external users.

Consider expanding the documentation like this:

-// ExecuteDescribeComponent describes component config and returns the final map of component configuration in the stack
+// ExecuteDescribeComponent executes the equivalent of `atmos describe component <component> -s <stack>` programmatically
+// and returns the final map of component configuration in the stack.
+//
+// Parameters:
+//   - component: The name of the component to describe
+//   - stack: The stack context in which to describe the component
+//   - processTemplates: Whether to process any templates in the component configuration
+//
+// Returns:
+//   - map[string]any: The resolved component configuration
+//   - error: Any error encountered during execution
pkg/describe/describe_component_test.go (2)

86-86: Use consistent import path for ExecuteDescribeComponent

For consistency with other test cases, consider using the imported e.ExecuteDescribeComponent instead of the direct package reference.

-	componentSection, err := ExecuteDescribeComponent(component, stack, true)
+	componentSection, err := e.ExecuteDescribeComponent(component, stack, true)

Line range hint 1-92: Consider adding TestDescribeComponent4 for completeness

There appears to be a gap in the test case numbering sequence (TestDescribeComponent4 is missing). While this doesn't affect functionality, maintaining a consistent sequence helps with readability and organization.

Would you like me to help draft TestDescribeComponent4 to maintain the sequence?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a564308 and cf7d74d.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • go.sum is excluded by !**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • examples/quick-start-advanced/Dockerfile (1 hunks)
  • go.mod (4 hunks)
  • pkg/describe/describe_component.go (1 hunks)
  • pkg/describe/describe_component_test.go (1 hunks)
  • website/docs/integrations/atlantis.mdx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • go.mod
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
examples/quick-start-advanced/Dockerfile (1)
Learnt from: aknysh
PR: cloudposse/atmos#775
File: examples/quick-start-advanced/Dockerfile:9-9
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T05:52:05.088Z
Learning: It is acceptable to set `ARG ATMOS_VERSION` to a future version like `1.105.0` in `examples/quick-start-advanced/Dockerfile` if that will be the next release.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
pkg/describe/describe_component.go (2)

1-5: LGTM! Package structure aligns with Go best practices.

The placement in pkg and the import of the internal implementation follows the standard Go project layout, making the function properly accessible to external consumers while maintaining encapsulation of the core logic.


8-14: Verify the function's usage pattern matches ExecuteDescribeStacks.

Since this function is meant to complement ExecuteDescribeStacks, let's verify the consistency of the implementation pattern.

✅ Verification successful

Function implementation patterns are consistent

Both functions follow the same pattern of being thin wrappers around their internal executor counterparts:

  • ExecuteDescribeComponent forwards its parameters directly to e.ExecuteDescribeComponent
  • ExecuteDescribeStacks forwards its parameters directly to e.ExecuteDescribeStacks

The implementation patterns match perfectly, maintaining consistency across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare implementation patterns with ExecuteDescribeStacks

# Check the implementation of ExecuteDescribeStacks
rg -A 10 "func ExecuteDescribeStacks" pkg/

Length of output: 774


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the full implementation of ExecuteDescribeComponent to understand the pattern better
rg -A 10 "type Engine struct" pkg/describe/
rg -A 10 "func \(e \*Engine\) ExecuteDescribeComponent" pkg/describe/

Length of output: 117


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the implementation patterns
rg -l "ExecuteDescribeComponent" pkg/
rg -l "ExecuteDescribeStacks" pkg/

# Then examine the content of these files
fd -e go . pkg/describe/ -x cat {}

Length of output: 16600

pkg/describe/describe_component_test.go (1)

82-92: Test implementation looks solid! 💪

The new test case follows the established pattern and adds coverage for a different stack configuration. Good job maintaining consistency in the test structure.

website/docs/integrations/atlantis.mdx (1)

676-676: LGTM! Version update looks consistent.

The ATMOS_VERSION update from 1.105.0 to 1.109.0 aligns with the version changes mentioned in the AI summary.

Let's verify version consistency across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Version update is consistent across the codebase

The version 1.109.0 is consistently used in both the Atlantis integration documentation and the quick-start example Dockerfile. No other version references were found, confirming proper synchronization.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any inconsistent version references
# Look for version strings in various file types, focusing on common configuration and documentation files
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!.git' "1\.10[5-9]\.0"

Length of output: 181

examples/quick-start-advanced/Dockerfile Show resolved Hide resolved
@aknysh aknysh merged commit 4b30800 into main Nov 23, 2024
30 of 31 checks passed
@aknysh aknysh deleted the public-package-describe-component branch November 23, 2024 00:15
Copy link

These changes were released in v1.109.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
minor New features that do not break anything
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants