-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 102
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Expose ExecuteDescribeComponent
function in pkg
to make it publicly accessible from other Go programs
#801
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request includes several updates across multiple files. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
pkg/describe/describe_component.go (1)
7-14
: Consider enhancing the function documentation.While the implementation is solid, the documentation could be more comprehensive to help external users.
Consider expanding the documentation like this:
-// ExecuteDescribeComponent describes component config and returns the final map of component configuration in the stack +// ExecuteDescribeComponent executes the equivalent of `atmos describe component <component> -s <stack>` programmatically +// and returns the final map of component configuration in the stack. +// +// Parameters: +// - component: The name of the component to describe +// - stack: The stack context in which to describe the component +// - processTemplates: Whether to process any templates in the component configuration +// +// Returns: +// - map[string]any: The resolved component configuration +// - error: Any error encountered during executionpkg/describe/describe_component_test.go (2)
86-86
: Use consistent import path for ExecuteDescribeComponentFor consistency with other test cases, consider using the imported
e.ExecuteDescribeComponent
instead of the direct package reference.- componentSection, err := ExecuteDescribeComponent(component, stack, true) + componentSection, err := e.ExecuteDescribeComponent(component, stack, true)
Line range hint
1-92
: Consider adding TestDescribeComponent4 for completenessThere appears to be a gap in the test case numbering sequence (TestDescribeComponent4 is missing). While this doesn't affect functionality, maintaining a consistent sequence helps with readability and organization.
Would you like me to help draft TestDescribeComponent4 to maintain the sequence?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.sum
is excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
examples/quick-start-advanced/Dockerfile
(1 hunks)go.mod
(4 hunks)pkg/describe/describe_component.go
(1 hunks)pkg/describe/describe_component_test.go
(1 hunks)website/docs/integrations/atlantis.mdx
(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- go.mod
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
examples/quick-start-advanced/Dockerfile (1)
Learnt from: aknysh
PR: cloudposse/atmos#775
File: examples/quick-start-advanced/Dockerfile:9-9
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T05:52:05.088Z
Learning: It is acceptable to set `ARG ATMOS_VERSION` to a future version like `1.105.0` in `examples/quick-start-advanced/Dockerfile` if that will be the next release.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
pkg/describe/describe_component.go (2)
1-5
: LGTM! Package structure aligns with Go best practices.
The placement in pkg
and the import of the internal implementation follows the standard Go project layout, making the function properly accessible to external consumers while maintaining encapsulation of the core logic.
8-14
: Verify the function's usage pattern matches ExecuteDescribeStacks
.
Since this function is meant to complement ExecuteDescribeStacks
, let's verify the consistency of the implementation pattern.
✅ Verification successful
Function implementation patterns are consistent
Both functions follow the same pattern of being thin wrappers around their internal executor counterparts:
ExecuteDescribeComponent
forwards its parameters directly toe.ExecuteDescribeComponent
ExecuteDescribeStacks
forwards its parameters directly toe.ExecuteDescribeStacks
The implementation patterns match perfectly, maintaining consistency across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare implementation patterns with ExecuteDescribeStacks
# Check the implementation of ExecuteDescribeStacks
rg -A 10 "func ExecuteDescribeStacks" pkg/
Length of output: 774
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the full implementation of ExecuteDescribeComponent to understand the pattern better
rg -A 10 "type Engine struct" pkg/describe/
rg -A 10 "func \(e \*Engine\) ExecuteDescribeComponent" pkg/describe/
Length of output: 117
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search to understand the implementation patterns
rg -l "ExecuteDescribeComponent" pkg/
rg -l "ExecuteDescribeStacks" pkg/
# Then examine the content of these files
fd -e go . pkg/describe/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 16600
pkg/describe/describe_component_test.go (1)
82-92
: Test implementation looks solid! 💪
The new test case follows the established pattern and adds coverage for a different stack configuration. Good job maintaining consistency in the test structure.
website/docs/integrations/atlantis.mdx (1)
676-676
: LGTM! Version update looks consistent.
The ATMOS_VERSION update from 1.105.0 to 1.109.0 aligns with the version changes mentioned in the AI summary.
Let's verify version consistency across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Version update is consistent across the codebase
The version 1.109.0
is consistently used in both the Atlantis integration documentation and the quick-start example Dockerfile. No other version references were found, confirming proper synchronization.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any inconsistent version references
# Look for version strings in various file types, focusing on common configuration and documentation files
rg -g '!node_modules' -g '!.git' "1\.10[5-9]\.0"
Length of output: 181
These changes were released in v1.109.0. |
what
ExecuteDescribeComponent
function inpkg
to make it publicly accessible from other Go programswhy
in Go, packages placed inside an
internal
folder are considered private, meaning they can only be accessed within the same module or project and cannot be imported by other external projects, effectively acting as a way to hide implementation details and control the public API surface of the code. Everything inpkg
is publicThe
ExecuteDescribeComponent
function will be used in otherGo
modules to programmatically executeatmos describe component <component> -s <stack>
, similar toExecuteDescribeStacks
(which is already public)https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-provider-utils/blob/main/go.mod#L6
https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-provider-utils/blob/main/internal/provider/data_source_describe_stacks.go#L12
https://github.com/cloudposse/terraform-provider-utils/blob/main/internal/provider/data_source_describe_stacks.go#L170
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Tests