Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve custom command error message for missing arguments #752

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

pkbhowmick
Copy link
Collaborator

@pkbhowmick pkbhowmick commented Oct 30, 2024

what

  • improved custom command error message for missing arguments including the name of argument for better user's understanding.

why

  • If a custom command expects an argument, it should say so with the arguments name.

Current:
image

After fix:
image

references

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced error messages for invalid argument counts in command processing, providing clearer guidance on required arguments.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for empty argument names, ensuring better logging and visibility of issues.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on improving error handling and command processing logic within the cmd/cmd_utils.go file. A new import for the errors package is included to facilitate the creation of more descriptive error messages, particularly in the preCustomCommand function, which now provides clearer feedback on invalid argument counts. Other functions maintain their existing structures but ensure consistent command context during execution. Overall, the modifications aim to enhance user experience through better error reporting while preserving the integrity of command processing.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
cmd/cmd_utils.go - Added import for errors package.
- Enhanced error handling in preCustomCommand for invalid argument counts.
- Function signature updated for preCustomCommand.
- Other functions retain structure and logic.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

minor

Suggested reviewers

  • osterman

Poem

In the meadow where commands play,
Errors now clearer, come what may.
With messages bright, we hop and cheer,
Processing smoothly, no need to fear!
A rabbit's delight, in code we trust,
Enhancements abound, in changes we must! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@pkbhowmick
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai review

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 30, 2024

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@pkbhowmick pkbhowmick changed the title update custom command error message for missing arguments improve custom command error message for missing arguments Oct 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 682d6e5 and 873b1ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cmd/cmd_utils.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cmd/cmd_utils.go (1)

5-5: LGTM: Clean import addition

The addition of the errors package import is appropriate for the enhanced error handling implementation.

cmd/cmd_utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Pulak Kanti Bhowmick <[email protected]>
@pkbhowmick pkbhowmick marked this pull request as ready for review October 30, 2024 08:20
@pkbhowmick pkbhowmick requested review from a team as code owners October 30, 2024 08:20
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 873b1ca and 2ee66a9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cmd/cmd_utils.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cmd/cmd_utils.go (1)

5-5: LGTM: Import addition is appropriate

The addition of the errors package import is necessary for the enhanced error handling implementation.

cmd/cmd_utils.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@aknysh aknysh added the no-release Do not create a new release (wait for additional code changes) label Oct 30, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2ee66a9 and b07f7a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cmd/cmd_utils.go (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
cmd/cmd_utils.go (1)

5-5: LGTM!

The addition of the errors package import is appropriate for the enhanced error handling implementation.

cmd/cmd_utils.go Show resolved Hide resolved
cmd/cmd_utils.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@aknysh aknysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @pkbhowmick

@aknysh aknysh merged commit 1f135ad into main Oct 31, 2024
23 checks passed
@aknysh aknysh deleted the pulak/DEV-2329 branch October 31, 2024 00:40
Copy link

These changes were released in v1.99.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-release Do not create a new release (wait for additional code changes)
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants