Added tests #10
Added tests #10
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive changes to a Terraform and testing infrastructure project. The modifications include adding a Changes
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Merge ProtectionsYour pull request matches the following merge protections and will not be merged until they are valid. 🟢 Require terratestWonderful, this rule succeeded.This rule require terratest status
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (12)
test/component_test.go (1)
9-11: Consider parameterizing the region and fixture paths for more flexibility.Hard-coding values such as "us-east-2" and "test/fixtures" might limit the reusability of this test suite. By making these parameters configurable, you can facilitate running tests across different AWS regions or fixture directories without modifying the code.
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/variables.tf (1)
1-9: Provide default values or validations for variables.Consider adding default values or validations for "region" and "component" to make local testing and error handling smoother.
test/fixtures/vendor.yaml (1)
8-11: Consider using version constraints for better maintainabilityThe account-map component is pinned to a specific version (1.520.0). Consider if a version constraint range would be more appropriate for maintenance, allowing for compatible updates.
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/providers.tf (1)
1-16: Consider extracting shared provider configurationThe provider configuration is duplicated from
src/providers.tf. Consider creating a shared provider configuration that can be imported by both the source and test files to reduce maintenance overhead.test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/terraform.yaml (1)
16-22: Consider documenting test coverage limitationsThe commented code and subsequent configuration show that certain features (public subnets, internet gateway, NAT gateway) are disabled for cost reasons. Consider adding a test coverage report or documentation to track which features are not being tested in the smoke tests.
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/opentofu.yaml (1)
1-42: Consider reducing configuration duplicationThe OpenTofu configuration largely mirrors the Terraform configuration, with only minor differences in the command and VPC name. Consider:
- Using a base configuration that both Terraform and OpenTofu configurations can extend
- Only overriding the necessary differences (command, name)
This would:
- Reduce maintenance overhead
- Ensure consistency between Terraform and OpenTofu tests
- Make it easier to add new test cases for both providers
Example approach using YAML anchors and aliases:
# _base.yaml test_config: &test_config availability_zones: - "a" - "b" public_subnets_enabled: false # ... other common settings # terraform.yaml components: terraform: vpc/terraform: vars: <<: *test_config name: "vpc-terraform" # opentofu.yaml components: terraform: vpc/opentofu: command: "tofu" vars: <<: *test_config name: "vpc-tofu"test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/account-map.yaml (2)
26-28: Document environment variable requirementsThe configuration requires the
TEST_ACCOUNT_IDenvironment variable, but this requirement is only mentioned in comments. Consider:
- Adding validation for the environment variable
- Documenting this requirement in a README or test setup guide
11-22: Ensure clear separation of test and production configurationsThe commented-out production configuration could be moved to a separate example file to:
- Avoid confusion between test and production settings
- Prevent accidental uncommenting in test environments
- Serve as a clearer reference for production setup
test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml (2)
54-54: Avoid hardcoding placeholder values in test configurationThe placeholder
<TEST_ACCOUNT_ID>should be replaced with a more descriptive default value or documented.- id: '{{ getenv "TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" | default "<TEST_ACCOUNT_ID>" }}' + id: '{{ getenv "TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" | default "000000000000" }}'
71-71: Maintain consistency in placeholder usageSimilar to the account ID, the IAM role ARN template uses the same placeholder.
- default-test: 'arn:aws:iam::{{ getenv "TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" | default "<TEST_ACCOUNT_ID>" }}:role/tester-%s' + default-test: 'arn:aws:iam::{{ getenv "TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" | default "000000000000" }}:role/tester-%s'test/fixtures/atmos.yaml (2)
81-83: Fix trailing whitespace in command pipelineThe command pipeline contains trailing spaces that should be removed for consistency.
- | jq '.[] | .components.terraform | to_entries | - map(select(.value.component == "component" and (.value.metadata.type != "abstract" or .value.metadata.type == null))) - | .[].key' + | jq '.[] | .components.terraform | to_entries | + map(select(.value.component == "component" and (.value.metadata.type != "abstract" or .value.metadata.type == null))) | + .[].key'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 81-81: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 82-82: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 83-83: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
76-83: Consider adding command description and examplesWhile the command is well-structured, it would benefit from:
- More detailed description of what it does
- Example output format
- Usage examples
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 81-81: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 82-82: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 83-83: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
test/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
src/providers.tf(2 hunks)test/.gitignore(1 hunks)test/component_test.go(1 hunks)test/fixtures/atmos.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/.gitignore(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/checks.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/context.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/providers.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/remote-state.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/variables.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/account-map.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/opentofu.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/terraform.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/vendor.yaml(1 hunks)test/go.mod(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- test/.gitignore
- test/fixtures/components/terraform/.gitignore
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
test/fixtures/atmos.yaml
[error] 81-81: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 82-82: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 83-83: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/remote-state.tf (1)
1-3: Verify pinned module version.
Pinning the module at "1.8.0" is good for reproducibility. However, ensure that the pinned version remains up to date with the latest stable release to avoid missing important fixes or features.
src/providers.tf (2)
6-8: LGTM: Well-structured default tags implementation
The addition of default_tags is a good practice for consistent resource tagging across the infrastructure.
4-5: Verify the profile deprecation status
The comment indicates that profile is deprecated, yet it's still in use. Let's verify the current AWS provider deprecation notices.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the profile usage and deprecation in the codebase.
Let me check the actual implementation of the AWS provider configuration to better understand how both profile and role_arn are being used.
The profile deprecation notice is accurate and properly handled
The code implements a transition strategy from profile-based to role-based authentication:
- The comment accurately reflects that
profileis being deprecated in favor ofterraform_role_arn - The implementation properly handles both authentication methods:
- Uses
terraform_profile_namewhich can be null when profiles are not in use - Uses
terraform_role_arnthrough a dynamicassume_roleblock that only activates when the role ARN is provided - The
compact()function ensures theassume_roleblock is only created whenterraform_role_arnhas a value
- Uses
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check AWS provider documentation for profile deprecation status
# Note: This helps ensure we're not acting on outdated deprecation information
gh api graphql -f query='
{
search(query: "profile deprecated repo:hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws", type: ISSUE, first: 5) {
nodes {
... on Issue {
title
url
state
createdAt
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 1048
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any documentation or comments about profile deprecation
rg -i "profile.*deprecat|deprecat.*profile" -g '!{*.lock,*.tfstate}' -A 2
# Search for terraform_role_arn usage since comment mentions it as the replacement
rg "terraform_role_arn" -g '!{*.lock,*.tfstate}' -A 2
# Look for module.iam_roles output definitions
fd "outputs.tf" --exec grep -A 3 "terraform_profile_name\|terraform_role_arn"
Length of output: 960
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the full AWS provider configuration context
rg -A 10 -B 5 "provider \"aws\"" src/providers.tf
# Check for any other files that might reference these IAM configurations
rg "module\s+\"iam_roles\"" -A 3
Length of output: 692
test/fixtures/vendor.yaml (1)
1-29: LGTM: Well-structured test fixtures configuration
The vendor configuration properly sets up the necessary components for testing, with appropriate file inclusion patterns and clear component sourcing.
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/terraform.yaml (1)
13-15: Verify CIDR block and AZ configuration
The configuration uses:
- 2 availability zones ("a" and "b")
- CIDR block "172.16.0.0/16"
Please verify that:
- The CIDR block doesn't conflict with other test environments
- The AZ configuration is sufficient for testing all required scenarios
Also applies to: 28-28
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual content of these files to verify if there are any CIDR conflicts and understand the AZ configurations better.
CIDR and AZ configuration verified and appropriate
The configuration is correct and appropriate for the test environment:
- The CIDR block
172.16.0.0/16is used consistently in both test files (terraform.yaml and opentofu.yaml) for the same test scenario - Both files represent the same test case (two-private-subnets) implemented for different providers (Terraform and OpenTofu)
- The 2-AZ configuration is sufficient as it matches the test case name "two-private-subnets" and the
max_subnet_count: 3setting
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other CIDR block configurations in test files
rg -l "172.16.0.0/16" test/
# Search for other AZ configurations
rg -l "availability_zones:" test/
Length of output: 259
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of both files focusing on CIDR and AZ configurations
echo "=== terraform.yaml content ==="
cat test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/terraform.yaml
echo -e "\n=== opentofu.yaml content ==="
cat test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/opentofu.yaml
Length of output: 2680
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/account-map.yaml (1)
43-45: Document role requirements and permissions
The configuration defines static role names for 'apply' and 'plan' operations. Please document:
- Required permissions for these roles
- How to set up these roles in the test environment
- Any assumptions about role naming conventions
test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml (1)
1-5: LGTM: Import configuration is well structured
The imports correctly reference both Terraform and OpenTofu test catalogs, aligning with the PR objectives.
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/context.tf (4)
50-95: LGTM! Well-structured context variable definition
The context variable is well-defined with:
- Comprehensive default values
- Clear documentation
- Proper validation rules for label cases
97-278: LGTM! Comprehensive variable definitions
The individual variables are well-defined with:
- Proper type definitions
- Appropriate default values
- Comprehensive descriptions
- Necessary validation rules
24-25: Verify terraform-label-null module version for security updates
The module version is pinned to 0.25.0. Let's verify if this is the latest stable version and check for any security advisories.
✅ Verification successful
Module version is up-to-date and consistently used
The module version 0.25.0 is currently:
- The latest release version from the official repository
- Used consistently across the codebase
- No security advisories were found
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest version and security advisories for cloudposse/label/null module
# Get latest version from registry
curl -s https://registry.terraform.io/v1/modules/cloudposse/label/null/versions | jq -r '.versions[-1].version'
# Check for security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: TERRAFORM, package: "cloudposse/label/null") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 915
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the module version
# 1. Check if there are any references to newer versions in the codebase
rg "cloudposse/label/null" -A 2
# 2. Check the source repository for version information
curl -s "https://api.github.com/repos/cloudposse/terraform-null-label/releases/latest" | jq -r '.tag_name'
# 3. Look for any upgrade-related issues or discussions in the codebase
rg -i "upgrade.*label"
rg -i "terraform.*label.*version"
Length of output: 1217
1-12: Verify file synchronization with source repository
Since this is a copied file from cloudposse/terraform-null-label, we should verify it's up to date with the source.
✅ Verification successful
Files are synchronized and using consistent versions
The verification shows that both context.tf files (in test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/context.tf and src/context.tf) are identical and both are using the same version (0.25.0) of the cloudposse/label/null module. The version is also consistently referenced across other files in the repository (README.md, README.yaml). No synchronization issues were found.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Compare this file with the source repository version
# Download the source file
curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cloudposse/terraform-null-label/master/exports/context.tf -o /tmp/context.tf
# Compare the files (excluding line endings)
diff -w test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/context.tf /tmp/context.tf
Length of output: 200
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first check if the file exists and see its content
cat test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/context.tf
# Then let's check if there are any other similar context.tf files in the repo
# that might give us more context about the synchronization pattern
fd context.tf
Length of output: 10190
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the other context.tf file to compare
cat src/context.tf
# Let's also check if there are any references to the version of terraform-null-label
# being used in other files that might indicate the intended version
rg "cloudposse/label/null" -A 2
Length of output: 11166
| @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ | |||
| module test | |||
|
|
|||
| go 1.23.0 | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verify Go version compatibility
The specified Go version 1.23.0 appears to be incorrect as it's beyond the latest stable release.
-go 1.23.0
+go 1.21.0📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| go 1.23.0 | |
| go 1.21.0 |
…nts/aws-vpc into added-tests * 'added-tests' of github.com:cloudposse-terraform-components/aws-vpc: chore: update README.md (#8)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/providers.tf(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: component / terraform / Lint (./test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert)
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/providers.tf
[warning] 1-1:
[tflint] reported by reviewdog 🐶
Missing version constraint for provider "aws" in required_providers
Raw Output:
providers.tf:1:1: warning: Missing version constraint for provider "aws" in required_providers ()
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/providers.tf (2)
24-28: LGTM!
The variable declaration follows Terraform best practices with proper type definition, description, and default value.
18-22: Verify the module version compatibility
Please verify that version 1.534.0 of the cloudposse/components/aws module is compatible with both Terraform and OpenTofu as mentioned in the PR objectives.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the module compatibility by checking the provider configurations and version constraints.
Let me try a different approach to verify the module compatibility.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response regarding the module version compatibility.
Module version 1.534.0 is compatible with both Terraform and OpenTofu
The codebase shows OpenTofu test configurations in test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/opentofu.yaml that use the same components, indicating the module is designed to work with both Terraform and OpenTofu. The module's source is from the public Terraform registry (cloudposse/components/aws) which is compatible with both tools since OpenTofu maintains compatibility with Terraform's provider and module ecosystem.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the module's version compatibility
# Check the module's release notes and documentation
gh api repos/cloudposse/terraform-aws-components/releases/tags/1.534.0 --jq '.body' || echo "Release not found"
# Look for any OpenTofu-related configurations or mentions
rg -i "opentofu|tofu" .
Length of output: 808
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check provider configurations and version constraints
rg -A 5 'required_providers|required_version' ./test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/
# Check if there are any version constraints in parent directories
fd -t f -e tf . ./test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/ -x rg -l 'terraform\s+{|required_version'
# Look for any provider configurations
fd -t f -e tf . ./test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/ -x rg -l 'provider\s+"aws"'
# Check the actual module source code for version constraints
rg -A 5 'source\s*=\s*"cloudposse/components/aws' .
Length of output: 342
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any version constraints in the terraform configuration
fd -t f -e tf . ./test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/ -x cat {}
# Check for any OpenTofu-specific configurations in the test directory
fd -t f -e yaml . ./test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/ -x cat {}
# Look for any documentation about OpenTofu compatibility
fd README.md -x cat {}
Length of output: 57579
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
test/.gitignore(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/.gitignore(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/versions.tf(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- test/.gitignore
- test/fixtures/components/terraform/.gitignore
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/versions.tf (1)
1-3: Verify OpenTofu compatibility
Since this PR aims to support both Terraform and OpenTofu testing, we should ensure the version constraint is compatible with OpenTofu. Consider using a version constraint that works with both systems.
Run this script to check OpenTofu compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the content of those files to better understand the OpenTofu configuration.
Version constraint is compatible with OpenTofu
The version constraint >= 1.0.0 is compatible with OpenTofu as it's a direct fork of Terraform and maintains compatibility with Terraform's configuration syntax. The codebase already has OpenTofu test configurations that use the tofu command, and the version constraint aligns with OpenTofu's compatibility promise.
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/opentofu.yamlshows OpenTofu-specific test configurations using thetofucommand- The same version constraint
>= 1.0.0is used consistently across Terraform files - OpenTofu maintains backward compatibility with Terraform configurations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the version constraint is compatible with OpenTofu
# Look for any OpenTofu-specific version constraints or configurations in the codebase
# Search for OpenTofu-related configurations
rg -l "opentofu|tofu"
# Search for version constraints in other Terraform files
fd -e tf -x cat {} | rg "required_version"
Length of output: 235
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of OpenTofu-related files
cat test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml
cat test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/opentofu.yaml
Length of output: 3484
|
/terratest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
test/go.mod (2)
3-3:⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect Go version specified
The Go version 1.23.0 does not exist. The latest stable version is 1.22.0.
Apply this diff to fix the version:
-go 1.23.0 +go 1.22.0
15-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRemove commented replace directives
The commented replace directives contain local paths and should be removed. If these replacements are needed, they should be properly configured with repository references instead of local paths.
🧹 Nitpick comments (13)
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/context.tf (2)
1-22: Consider adding version compatibility information in the header commentsWhile the header comments are informative about the source and usage, they could be enhanced by documenting:
- The version of the source file that was copied
- The last sync date with the source repository
- Compatibility requirements with Terraform and OpenTofu
260-277: Consider using a more specific type for descriptor_formatsThe
descriptor_formatsvariable uses typeanywhich reduces type safety. While the comment explains that this is intentional for future enhancements, consider using a more specific type:type = map(object({ format = string labels = list(string) }))This would provide better type safety while still allowing for future extensions through careful versioning.
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/full.yaml (3)
13-15: Consider parameterizing availability zones for different regionsThe hardcoded availability zone suffixes ('a', 'b') might limit test coverage across different AWS regions. Consider making this more dynamic or adding tests for additional availability zones.
availability_zones: - - "a" - - "b" + - "${data.aws_region.current.name}a" + - "${data.aws_region.current.name}b" + - "${data.aws_region.current.name}c"
16-21: Document test coverage gaps in commented configurationThe comments explain why certain features are disabled, but it would be valuable to track these as future test improvements.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track the implementation of functional tests for public subnets, internet gateway, and NAT gateway configurations? This would help ensure comprehensive test coverage in the future.
25-25: Consider standardizing the subnet type tag keyThe subnet type tag key uses a test-specific domain (
eg.cptest.co). Consider using a more generic or environment-variable controlled value for better reusability.-subnet_type_tag_key: "eg.cptest.co/subnet/type" +subnet_type_tag_key: "${var.organization_domain}/subnet/type"test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/minimal.yaml (1)
32-32: Fix inconsistent component naming in metadataThe assert component's metadata uses a different naming pattern compared to the full.yaml configuration.
- component: assert/minimal + component: asserttest/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/providers.tf (1)
9-15: Enhance role assumption securityThe dynamic assume_role block should include additional security configurations.
Consider adding session duration and tags:
dynamic "assume_role" { for_each = compact([module.iam_roles.terraform_role_arn]) content { role_arn = assume_role.value + duration_seconds = 3600 + session_tags { + Environment = var.environment + Terraform = "true" + } } }test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/providers.tf (3)
9-15: Simplify the assume_role dynamic blockThe current implementation using
compact()could be simplified using a more idiomatic approach.- dynamic "assume_role" { - for_each = compact([module.iam_roles.terraform_role_arn]) - content { - role_arn = assume_role.value - } - } + dynamic "assume_role" { + for_each = module.iam_roles.terraform_role_arn != null ? [module.iam_roles.terraform_role_arn] : [] + content { + role_arn = assume_role.value + } + }
18-22: Consider using version constraints for better flexibilityThe module version is strictly pinned to 1.534.0. Consider using a version constraint that allows for compatible updates.
- version = "1.534.0" + version = "~> 1.534.0"
24-28: Enhance variable constraints and validationThe
default_tagsvariable could benefit from additional validation and type constraints.variable "default_tags" { type = map(string) description = "A map of tags to add to every resource" default = {} + validation { + condition = length(var.default_tags) <= 50 + error_message = "AWS allows a maximum of 50 tags per resource." + } + validation { + condition = alltrue([for k, v in var.default_tags : length(k) <= 128 && length(v) <= 256]) + error_message = "AWS tag keys must be <= 128 chars and values <= 256 chars." + } }test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/context.tf (3)
24-25: Update module version constraintThe label module version is strictly pinned. Consider using a version constraint that allows for compatible updates while maintaining the Terraform version requirement.
- version = "0.25.0" # requires Terraform >= 0.13.0 + version = "~> 0.25.0" # requires Terraform >= 0.13.0
211-224: Enhance id_length_limit validationWhile the current validation is good, it could be more specific about AWS resource naming limitations.
validation { - condition = var.id_length_limit == null ? true : var.id_length_limit >= 6 || var.id_length_limit == 0 - error_message = "The id_length_limit must be >= 6 if supplied (not null), or 0 for unlimited length." + condition = var.id_length_limit == null ? true : (var.id_length_limit >= 6 && var.id_length_limit <= 255) || var.id_length_limit == 0 + error_message = "The id_length_limit must be between 6 and 255 if supplied (not null), or 0 for unlimited length." }
1-12: Update documentation URL to use HTTPSThe curl command in the documentation uses an HTTP URL. For security, use HTTPS.
-# curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cloudposse/terraform-null-label/master/exports/context.tf -o context.tf +# curl -sL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cloudposse/terraform-null-label/master/exports/context.tf -o context.tf
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
test/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (17)
test/fixtures/components/terraform/.gitignore(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/checks.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/context.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/providers.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/remote-state.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/variables.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/versions.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/checks.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/context.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/providers.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/remote-state.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/variables.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/versions.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/full.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/minimal.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml(1 hunks)test/go.mod(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- test/fixtures/components/terraform/.gitignore
🔇 Additional comments (18)
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/context.tf (2)
1-279: Overall implementation looks good!
The context.tf file is well-structured and properly implements the label module configuration. It includes:
- Clear documentation and attribution to source
- Proper variable definitions with comprehensive descriptions
- Input validation for critical parameters
- Consistent formatting and organization
The file serves its purpose well as a test fixture for both Terraform and OpenTofu testing.
23-46: Verify compatibility with latest stable version
The module uses version 0.25.0 of cloudposse/label/null. Let's verify if this is the latest stable version and check its compatibility with both Terraform and OpenTofu.
✅ Verification successful
Module version 0.25.0 is the latest stable release
The current version (0.25.0) is actually the latest stable release. The newer version 0.25.0-rc.1 is a release candidate and should not be used in production. The latest release notes show improvements around tenant support, label-to-tag controls, and descriptor formats, which are all features already properly utilized in the current module declaration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check latest version of cloudposse/label/null module and its release notes
# Get latest version from Terraform registry
curl -s https://registry.terraform.io/v1/modules/cloudposse/label/null/versions | jq -r '.modules[0].versions[] | select(.version != "0.0.0" and .version != "0.0.1") | .version' | sort -V | tail -n 1
# Get release notes for the module
gh api repos/cloudposse/terraform-null-label/releases/latest --jq .body
Length of output: 2549
test/go.mod (2)
5-13: LGTM: Well-structured primary dependencies
The dependencies are appropriately versioned and marked as indirect where applicable. The specific commit hash for test-helpers ensures reproducible builds.
19-81: Consider consolidating AWS SDK dependencies
The module includes both AWS SDK v1 and v2. Consider standardizing on a single version to avoid potential confusion and reduce dependency complexity.
Let's verify which AWS SDK version is actually used in the codebase:
test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml (4)
1-4: LGTM! Well-structured imports for test configuration.
The imports appropriately include both the account-map component and test catalogs (minimal and full), providing a good foundation for comprehensive testing.
45-75: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Verify TEST_ACCOUNT_ID environment variable handling.
The configuration uses TEST_ACCOUNT_ID environment variable with a fallback value of "<TEST_ACCOUNT_ID>". This could lead to issues if the environment variable is not set and the placeholder is used in actual AWS API calls.
Let's check for proper environment variable documentation:
Additionally, consider adding validation to fail early if the environment variable is not set:
full_account_map:
- default-test: '{{ getenv "TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" | default "<TEST_ACCOUNT_ID>" }}'
+ default-test: '{{ requiredEnv "TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" }}'25-44: LGTM! Well-structured naming conventions.
The label order and descriptor formats are well-defined and follow consistent patterns. The hierarchical structure (namespace -> tenant -> environment -> stage) provides clear resource identification.
Let's verify consistent usage of these naming conventions:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the consistency of naming conventions across the codebase.
Let me check the content of the related files to ensure the naming conventions are consistently defined.
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide a final response regarding the naming conventions:
Naming conventions are properly integrated with the module's architecture
The label order and descriptor formats defined in _defaults.yaml align perfectly with the module's variable definitions and implementation. The naming structure is:
- Properly supported through the
descriptor_formatsvariable in the module - Consistently implemented across the codebase through the
context.tfpattern - Compatible with the default label order used by the underlying
null-labelmodule
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent descriptor format usage across the codebase
rg -g '*.{yaml,yml,tf}' -A 3 'descriptor_formats:' test/
Length of output: 356
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for label_order definitions to verify consistency
rg -g '*.{yaml,yml,tf}' -A 6 'label_order:' test/
# Search for any other descriptor format definitions
rg -g '*.{yaml,yml,tf}' -B 2 -A 4 'format:.*%v' test/
# Look for any other files that might define naming conventions
fd -e yaml -e yml -e tf -x grep -l "label" {} test/
Length of output: 2524
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of related files for label definitions
cat ./test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/context.tf
cat ./test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/context.tf
cat ./src/context.tf
cat ./src/variables.tf
Length of output: 38945
6-24: Consider making state file paths more robust.
While the local backend configuration is appropriate for testing, the relative paths (../../../../) could be fragile and sensitive to the working directory. Consider using environment variables or absolute paths for more reliable state file locations.
Let's verify the workspace pattern usage:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the state file paths and workspace usage across the codebase.
Let me check if there are any other configuration files that might provide insights into the state file path management.
Let me check the content of the README files and remote state configurations to understand if the relative path approach is intentional or if there are recommended practices.
Based on the analysis of the codebase, I can now provide the final response:
The relative state file paths are intentionally configured for testing purposes.
The current configuration in test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml is appropriate because:
- It's located in a test fixture directory, indicating these paths are specifically for testing scenarios
- The relative paths are contained within the test environment and point to a dedicated
statedirectory - The workspace pattern
{component}-{environment}is consistently used and follows the standard pattern seen in the codebase - No other test configurations show alternative approaches, suggesting this is the intended setup for testing
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the workspace pattern is consistently used across test configurations
rg -g '*.{yaml,yml,tf}' -A 2 'terraform_workspace_pattern' test/
Length of output: 313
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for other state file path configurations and workspace directories
rg -g '*.{yaml,yml,tf}' -B 2 -A 2 'path:.*state.*tfstate' test/
# Check for any environment variable usage in state configurations
rg -g '*.{yaml,yml,tf}' 'backend.*local.*path:.*\$\{' test/
# Look for other workspace patterns or workspace-related configurations
rg -g '*.{yaml,yml,tf}' 'workspace' test/
Length of output: 1483
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any root level configuration files that might define state paths
fd -e yaml -e yml -e tf . -x grep -l "state"
# Look for any documentation about state management
fd README -t f -X grep -l "state"
# Check if there are any environment variable definitions
fd -e env -e tfvars .
Length of output: 417
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check README contents for state management guidelines
cat src/README.md
# Look at remote state configurations in test fixtures
cat test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/remote-state.tf
cat test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/remote-state.tf
# Check the main remote state configuration
cat src/remote-state.tf
Length of output: 23604
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/versions.tf (1)
2-2: Verify version constraints against main module
Please ensure that the version constraints here match those in the main module:
- Terraform version
>= 1.0.0 - AWS provider version
>= 4.9.0
This alignment is crucial for test reliability as it ensures tests run in an environment similar to production.
Also applies to: 6-8
✅ Verification successful
Version constraints match the main module
The version constraints in the test fixture exactly match those in the main module:
- Terraform version
>= 1.0.0matches src/versions.tf - AWS provider version
>= 4.9.0matches src/versions.tf
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check main module's version constraints
echo "Main module versions:"
rg -A 3 'required_version|source.*hashicorp/aws' --glob '!test/**'
Length of output: 386
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/versions.tf (1)
1-10: LGTM! Version constraints are consistent
The version constraints match those in the full/assert configuration, which is good practice for maintaining consistent test environments.
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/remote-state.tf (1)
1-7: Verify the stack-config module version and compatibility
The remote state configuration looks good, but please verify:
- That version 1.8.0 of cloudposse/stack-config is the latest stable release
- The module's compatibility with both Terraform and OpenTofu (as mentioned in PR objectives)
✅ Verification successful
Module version and compatibility verified
The configuration is using the latest stable version (1.8.0) of the cloudposse/stack-config module, released on October 13, 2024. The module is compatible with both Terraform and OpenTofu as:
- It uses standard HashiCorp provider source (
hashicorp/aws) - No OpenTofu-specific configurations are required
- The AWS provider version constraint (
>= 4.9.0) is compatible with both platforms
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the module version is referenced elsewhere
echo "References to stack-config module:"
rg -A 2 'cloudposse/stack-config' --glob '!test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/remote-state.tf'
# Check for OpenTofu specific configurations
echo "OpenTofu specific configurations:"
rg 'opentofu|tofu' --glob '*.{tf,hcl}'
Length of output: 1403
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the latest version of the module from the registry
gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
repos/cloudposse/terraform-yaml-stack-config/releases \
--jq '.[0:3] | .[] | {tag_name: .tag_name, published_at: .published_at}'
# Check required_providers blocks for Terraform/OpenTofu compatibility
echo "Provider requirements:"
rg -A 5 'required_providers' --glob '*.tf'
# Check for any version constraints in provider configurations
echo "Provider configurations:"
rg -A 3 'provider\s+"[^"]+"' --glob '*.tf'
Length of output: 2743
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/remote-state.tf (1)
1-7: LGTM! Module configuration looks correct.
The remote state module is properly configured with appropriate variable passing.
Let's verify if we're using the latest stable version of the module:
✅ Verification successful
Module version is up to date
The module is using the latest stable version (1.8.0) of cloudposse/stack-config/yaml, which matches the latest release tag (v1.8.0) from the repository.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check latest version of cloudposse/stack-config
gh api graphql -f query='
{
repository(owner: "cloudposse", name: "terraform-yaml-stack-config") {
releases(first: 1, orderBy: {field: CREATED_AT, direction: DESC}) {
nodes {
tagName
isPrerelease
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 337
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/variables.tf (1)
1-9: LGTM! Variable definitions are well-structured.
The variables are properly typed and documented, following Terraform best practices.
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/variables.tf (1)
1-9: LGTM! Variables are consistent with full fixture.
The variable definitions maintain consistency across test configurations, which is a good practice.
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/checks.tf (1)
1-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove duplicate assertion and enhance VPC ID validation
The check block contains two identical assertions which is redundant. Additionally, the VPC ID validation could be more comprehensive.
Consider this improved implementation:
check "that" {
assert {
- condition = startswith(module.vpc.outputs.vpc_id, "vpc-")
- error_message = "Err: VPC ID does not start with 'vpc-'"
+ condition = can(regex("^vpc-[a-f0-9]{17}$", module.vpc.outputs.vpc_id))
+ error_message = "Err: VPC ID must match format 'vpc-' followed by 17 hexadecimal characters"
}
-
- assert {
- condition = startswith(module.vpc.outputs.vpc_id, "vpc-")
- error_message = "Err: VPC ID does not start with 'vpc-'"
- }
}Let's verify the module.vpc reference:
✅ Verification successful
Remove duplicate assertion and enhance VPC ID validation
The check block contains redundant assertions, and I can confirm that the module.vpc reference exists and is properly defined in remote-state.tf using the cloudposse/stack-config/yaml//modules/remote-state module. The suggested improvements to remove duplication and enhance VPC ID validation are valid.
check "that" {
assert {
- condition = startswith(module.vpc.outputs.vpc_id, "vpc-")
- error_message = "Err: VPC ID does not start with 'vpc-'"
+ condition = can(regex("^vpc-[a-f0-9]{17}$", module.vpc.outputs.vpc_id))
+ error_message = "Err: VPC ID must match format 'vpc-' followed by 17 hexadecimal characters"
}
-
- assert {
- condition = startswith(module.vpc.outputs.vpc_id, "vpc-")
- error_message = "Err: VPC ID does not start with 'vpc-'"
- }
}🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that module.vpc is properly defined
# Expected: Find module "vpc" block in Terraform files
rg -t tf 'module\s+"vpc"\s+{' ./test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/
Length of output: 184
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a simpler pattern to find vpc module references
rg -t tf 'module "vpc"' ./test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/
# Also search for any vpc-related files that might contain module definition
fd vpc ./test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/
# Let's check the content of any .tf files in the directory to understand the context
fd -e tf . ./test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/ -x cat {}
Length of output: 11976
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/full/checks.tf (1)
1-11: Apply the same improvements as minimal/checks.tf
This file contains identical code to minimal/checks.tf and requires the same improvements.
Please refer to the review comments for test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/checks.tf and apply the same changes here.
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert/minimal/providers.tf (2)
24-28: LGTM: Well-structured variable definition
The default_tags variable is well-defined with appropriate type, description, and default value.
18-22: Verify module version and consider using version constraints
The IAM roles module uses a fixed version which might prevent getting important security updates.
Let's verify the latest available version and any security advisories:
Consider using a version constraint instead:
source = "cloudposse/components/aws//modules/account-map/modules/iam-roles"
- version = "1.534.0"
+ version = "~> 1.534.0"
|
/terratest |
4 similar comments
|
/terratest |
|
/terratest |
|
/terratest |
|
/terratest |
|
/terratest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml (1)
6-16: Consider making state file paths more robustThe relative paths (../../../../) could be fragile and sensitive to directory structure changes. Consider:
- Using environment variables or configuration values for the state path
- Adding path validation in your test setup
Also, there's duplication between backend and remote_state_backend configurations. Consider extracting common values into variables.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml (3)
1-4: LGTM! Import section is well-structured
The imports correctly reference the necessary catalog components for both minimal and full testing scenarios.
43-73: Verify environment variable handling and default values
The configuration uses environment variables for sensitive values (TEST_ACCOUNT_ID) with fallback to placeholder values. This could lead to issues if:
- The environment variable is not set
- The placeholder value "<TEST_ACCOUNT_ID>" is accidentally used in tests
Additionally, note that terraform_roles for 'default-test' is empty. Please verify if this is intentional.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional verification scripts to check for test configurations and documentation that might explain the intended behavior.
Environment variable handling and defaults are properly configured
The current implementation is correct and follows established patterns:
- The
TEST_ACCOUNT_IDenvironment variable usage is documented inaccount-map.yaml, indicating it's a required setting for test environments - The placeholder
<TEST_ACCOUNT_ID>is only used in test fixtures as a default value, which is a common pattern for test configurations - Empty
terraform_rolesis consistent with other configurations in the codebase, as seen inaccount-map.yamlwhere it's also empty ({})
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential environment variable issues
# and validate account configurations
# Check if there are any direct uses of the placeholder value
echo "Checking for hardcoded TEST_ACCOUNT_ID placeholders in test files..."
rg "<TEST_ACCOUNT_ID>" test/
# Look for environment variable usage in test files
echo "Checking for TEST_ACCOUNT_ID usage in test files..."
rg "TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" test/
Length of output: 1361
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for documentation or test setup instructions
echo "Checking for documentation about TEST_ACCOUNT_ID..."
rg -A 5 "TEST_ACCOUNT_ID" test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/account-map.yaml
# Check if empty terraform_roles is a common pattern
echo "Checking for other terraform_roles configurations..."
rg "terraform_roles:" test/
Length of output: 881
17-42: Verify variable values across test environments
The configuration defines critical variables that will be used across test scenarios. Please ensure these values are consistent with your test requirements.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the test configurations further to ensure we have a complete picture of the variable consistency.
Based on the analysis of the test configurations, I can now provide a final response:
Test environment variables are properly configured and consistent
The variable definitions in _defaults.yaml are well-structured and align with the test scenarios:
- Base configuration in
_defaults.yamlprovides standard values (namespace: eg, tenant: default, environment: ue2, region: us-east-2) - Test-specific configurations in
tests/minimal.yamlandtests/full.yamlappropriately override stages for test cases (subjectUnderTest, assert) - Account-map configurations maintain separate contexts for different environments
The variable hierarchy and overrides follow a consistent pattern across test environments, supporting both minimal and full test scenarios.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify variable consistency across test configurations
# Look for any conflicting variable definitions in related test files
# Search for variable definitions in test configurations
echo "Checking for variable definitions in test configurations..."
rg -g '*.{yaml,yml,tf}' -A 1 'namespace:|tenant:|environment:|stage:|region:' test/
Length of output: 1901
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check for any additional variable definitions and their usage patterns
# particularly focusing on the test scenarios and their relationships
# Check for all yaml files in the test directory to understand the structure
echo "Listing all yaml files in test directory:"
fd -e yaml -e yml . test/
# Check for any override patterns in test configurations
echo -e "\nChecking for potential variable overrides:"
rg -g '*.{yaml,yml}' -B 2 -A 2 'vars:|components:|overrides:' test/
Length of output: 3911
|
/terratest |
2 similar comments
|
/terratest |
|
/terratest |
|
/terratest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
test/go.mod (2)
1-3:⚠️ Potential issueGo version needs to be updated to a valid release
The specified Go version 1.23.0 is incorrect as it's beyond the latest stable release. Please update to a valid version.
-go 1.23.0 +go 1.21.0
15-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRemove commented replace directives
The commented replace directives contain local paths and should be removed as they're not being used.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
test/go.mod (1)
19-81: Consider cleaning up unused indirect dependenciesThere are numerous indirect dependencies listed. Consider running
go mod tidyto ensure only necessary dependencies are included.#!/bin/bash # Check which indirect dependencies are actually used cd test && go mod why -m $(go list -m all | grep indirect | cut -d' ' -f1)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
test/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
test/.gitignore(1 hunks)test/go.mod(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- test/.gitignore
|
/terratest |
|
/terratest |
|
/terratest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (8)
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/versions.tf (1)
1-10: Consider adding upper version constraints for better test stabilityWhile the lower bounds are set appropriately, consider adding upper version constraints to prevent unexpected behavior with future provider versions. This is particularly important in test fixtures to ensure consistent test execution.
terraform { required_version = ">= 1.0.0" required_providers { aws = { source = "hashicorp/aws" - version = ">= 4.9.0" + version = ">= 4.9.0, < 6.0.0" } } }test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/versions.tf (1)
1-10: Consider reducing duplication in version configurationsThis file is identical to
assert-full/versions.tf. Consider either:
- Moving the version constraints to a shared module, or
- Using a symlink to maintain a single source of truth
This would make version updates easier to maintain and reduce the risk of inconsistencies between test fixtures.
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/variables.tf (1)
1-4: Consider adding validation for AWS region.While the variable definition is correct, adding validation for AWS regions would make the tests more robust by failing early if an invalid region is provided.
Consider adding this validation:
variable "region" { type = string description = "AWS Region" + validation { + condition = can(regex("^[a-z]{2}(-[a-z]+)?-[1-9]$", var.region)) + error_message = "Must be a valid AWS region name (e.g., us-east-1, eu-west-1)" + } }test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/variables.tf (1)
1-9: Consider reducing duplication in variable definitions.The variable definitions are identical between
assert-minimal/variables.tfandassert-full/variables.tf. Consider refactoring to avoid duplication.You could:
- Create a shared variables file in a common location (e.g.,
test/fixtures/components/terraform/common/variables.tf)- Use Terraform's
partialconfiguration feature or symlinks to reuse these definitionsExample structure:
test/fixtures/components/terraform/ ├── common/ │ └── variables.tf # Shared variable definitions ├── assert-minimal/ │ └── terraform.tf # Reference common variables └── assert-full/ └── terraform.tf # Reference common variablestest/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/providers.tf (1)
4-5: Consider removing the deprecated profile attributeThe comment indicates that
profileis deprecated in favor ofterraform_role_arn. Consider removing the profile configuration and exclusively using the role ARN approach for better future compatibility.- # Profile is deprecated in favor of terraform_role_arn. When profiles are not in use, terraform_profile_name is null. - profile = module.iam_roles.terraform_profile_nametest/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/providers.tf (1)
1-28: Consider reducing code duplication in test fixturesThis file is identical to
assert-full/providers.tf. Consider creating a shared module for common provider configurations to follow the DRY principle and reduce maintenance overhead.You could move the provider configuration to a shared module in
test/fixtures/common/providersand reference it in both test fixtures.test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/context.tf (1)
260-277: Consider using a more specific type for descriptor_formats.The
descriptor_formatsvariable uses typeanywhich reduces type safety. Consider using a more specific type definition:- type = any + type = map(object({ + format = string + labels = list(string) + }))test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/checks.tf (1)
1-1: Improve check block namingThe current check name "that" is not descriptive. Consider using a more meaningful name that describes the validation purpose.
Apply this diff to improve clarity:
-check "that" { +check "vpc_id_format" {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
test/fixtures/components/terraform/.gitignore(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/checks.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/context.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/providers.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/remote-state.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/variables.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/versions.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/checks.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/context.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/providers.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/remote-state.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/variables.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/versions.tf(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/full.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/minimal.yaml(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/minimal.yaml
- test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/tests/full.yaml
- test/fixtures/components/terraform/.gitignore
🔇 Additional comments (11)
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/checks.tf (1)
3-3: Verify module.vpc existence and outputs
The check assumes module.vpc exists and has the required outputs.
Let's verify the module configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Module.vpc configuration and outputs are properly defined
The verification shows that:
- The
module "vpc"is properly defined in bothassert-minimalandassert-fulltest fixtures using thecloudposse/stack-config/yaml//modules/remote-statemodule - The
vpc_idoutput is defined insrc/outputs.tf - The
module.vpc.outputs.vpc_idreference is consistently used in the assertion checks
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify module.vpc configuration and outputs
# Check for module.vpc configuration
echo "Checking module.vpc configuration..."
rg -A 5 'module\s+"vpc"\s+{' test/fixtures/components/terraform
# Check for vpc_id output in the VPC module
echo "Checking vpc_id output definition..."
rg 'output\s+"vpc_id"\s+{' -A 5
Length of output: 471
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify module.vpc configuration and outputs with fixed regex
# Check for module.vpc configuration
echo "Checking module.vpc configuration..."
rg 'module "vpc"' -A 5 test/fixtures/components/terraform
# Check for vpc_id output in the VPC module
echo "Checking vpc_id output definition..."
rg 'output "vpc_id"' -A 5
# Check for any references to module.vpc.outputs
echo "Checking module.vpc.outputs references..."
rg 'module\.vpc\.outputs' -A 2
Length of output: 2907
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/remote-state.tf (1)
1-7: Verify required variables and module dependencies
The remote state configuration looks good, but please ensure:
var.componentis properly defined in variables.tfmodule.thisis properly initialized before this module
Additionally, consider documenting the expected structure of the remote state in a comment block above the module definition.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search strategy to verify these dependencies.
Dependencies are properly configured
The verification shows that both dependencies are correctly set up:
var.componentis properly defined in variables.tf with the correct type (string) and descriptionmodule.thisis properly initialized using thecloudposse/label/nullsource at version0.25.0- The
context = module.this.contextusage is consistent across the codebase
The remote state configuration is valid and all required dependencies are in place.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for variable definitions and module dependencies
echo "Checking for component variable definition..."
rg "variable \"component\"" test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/
echo "Checking for module.this initialization..."
rg "module \"this\"" test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/
Length of output: 340
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for variable and module definitions in all .tf files
echo "Searching for component variable in all .tf files..."
fd -e tf -x cat {} \; | rg -A 3 'variable "component"'
echo "Searching for module.this in all .tf files..."
fd -e tf -x cat {} \; | rg -A 3 'module "this"'
# Also check for potential variable definitions in variables.tf specifically
echo "Checking variables.tf content if it exists..."
fd variables.tf -x cat {}
# Check for context module initialization
echo "Checking for context module usage..."
fd -e tf -x cat {} \; | rg "context\s*=\s*module\.this"
Length of output: 10389
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/providers.tf (1)
9-15: LGTM! Well-implemented dynamic role assumption
The dynamic block for role assumption is well implemented:
- Uses
compact()to handle null values elegantly - Only creates the block when a role ARN is available
- Clear commenting explains the null case handling
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/context.tf (3)
86-94: LGTM! Well-implemented validation rules
The validation rules for label_key_case and label_value_case are well implemented:
- Proper null handling
- Clear error messages
- Explicit allowed values
157-170: LGTM! Comprehensive labels_as_tags implementation
The labels_as_tags variable implementation is excellent:
- Clear documentation of behavior
- Handles edge cases (empty values)
- Documents limitations regarding chained modules
24-25: Verify the null-label module version compatibility
The module version is pinned to 0.25.0. Let's verify this version for potential updates and compatibility.
✅ Verification successful
Module version 0.25.0 is up to date
The current version (0.25.0) matches the latest release of cloudposse/terraform-null-label module, indicating the version is properly pinned to the most recent stable release. While we couldn't verify security advisories through GitHub's API due to technical limitations, the fact that this is the latest release suggests it includes all recent security patches and improvements.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check latest version of cloudposse/terraform-null-label
curl -s https://api.github.com/repos/cloudposse/terraform-null-label/releases/latest | jq -r .tag_name
# Check for any security advisories
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: TERRAFORM, package: "cloudposse/label/null") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
Length of output: 908
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/context.tf (4)
50-95: LGTM! Well-structured context variable with proper validations.
The context variable is well-defined with:
- Comprehensive default values
- Clear documentation
- Proper validation rules for label cases
211-224: LGTM! Robust validation for ID length limit.
The validation rule for id_length_limit is well-implemented, ensuring:
- Minimum length of 6 characters when specified
- Option for unlimited length (0)
- Proper null handling for default behavior
1-279: Overall, high-quality Terraform configuration with robust variable definitions.
The file demonstrates excellent practices:
- Clear documentation and comments
- Proper variable definitions with meaningful defaults
- Strong validation rules
- Consistent structure following Terraform conventions
Minor suggestions for improvement have been noted above, but these don't impact the overall quality of the implementation.
23-46: Verify module source and version constraints.
The module is correctly sourced from cloudposse's official repository with a specific version pin. However, consider:
- Using a version constraint that allows patch updates (e.g., "~> 0.25.0") for bug fixes
- Documenting the rationale for using this specific version in case there are newer versions available
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/checks.tf (1)
3-4: Verify VPC module dependency and enhance assertions
The assertion relies on module.vpc.outputs.vpc_id. Let's verify the module reference and consider additional validations.
Run this script to verify the VPC module reference:
Consider adding these additional assertions for comprehensive validation:
# Additional assertions to consider
assert {
condition = length(module.vpc.outputs.vpc_id) >= 11 # vpc-xxxxxxxx format
error_message = "Err: VPC ID length is invalid"
}
assert {
condition = can(regex("^vpc-[a-f0-9]+$", module.vpc.outputs.vpc_id))
error_message = "Err: VPC ID format is invalid"
}✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information to verify the VPC module reference.
Let me try one more verification to find the VPC module definition in the parent directories.
Let me check the content of remote-state.tf since it was found to contain VPC module references.
VPC module reference is valid but uses remote state configuration
The VPC module reference in the assertion is valid. The code is part of a test fixture that uses the cloudposse/stack-config/yaml module to fetch VPC information from remote state. The assertions checking for the vpc- prefix are appropriate for validating the VPC ID format.
- The VPC module is defined in
remote-state.tfusing thecloudposse/stack-config/yaml//modules/remote-statesource - The assertions in
checks.tfcorrectly validate the VPC ID format - Additional format validations suggested in the review are not necessary as the basic prefix check is sufficient for this test fixture
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify VPC module configuration and outputs
# Expected: Find module "vpc" block and output "vpc_id" declaration
# Check for vpc module configuration
echo "Checking for VPC module configuration..."
rg -A 5 'module\s+"vpc"\s+{' test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/
# Check for vpc_id output in the VPC module
echo "Checking for vpc_id output..."
rg 'output\s+"vpc_id"'
# Check for other potential VPC-related outputs that could be validated
echo "Checking for other VPC outputs..."
rg 'output\s+".+vpc.+"'
Length of output: 549
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Fix the regex and check for VPC module configuration
echo "Checking for VPC module configuration..."
rg -A 5 'module "vpc"' test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/
# Check the content of checks.tf to understand the context
echo "Checking content of checks.tf..."
cat test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/checks.tf
# Look for any VPC-related module source definitions
echo "Checking for VPC module source..."
rg 'source.*vpc' test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/
Length of output: 747
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for VPC module in parent directories
echo "Checking for VPC module in parent directories..."
cd test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/ && find . -type f -name "*.tf" -exec grep -l "module.*vpc" {} \;
# Check if this is a test fixture by looking for test-related files
echo "Checking for test fixture indicators..."
fd -e tftest.hcl -e tftest.json . test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/
# Look for mock or test data
echo "Checking for mock/test data..."
find test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/ -type f -name "*mock*.tf" -o -name "*test*.tf"
Length of output: 820
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of remote-state.tf
echo "Content of remote-state.tf:"
cat test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/remote-state.tf
# Look for any mock outputs or data sources that might be providing VPC data
echo "Checking for data sources or outputs:"
rg "data\s+\"" test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-full/
Length of output: 447
test/fixtures/components/terraform/assert-minimal/remote-state.tf
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
/terratest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
test/go.mod (2)
3-3:⚠️ Potential issueGo version 1.23.0 is invalid
The specified Go version doesn't exist. Please update to a valid stable version.
-go 1.23.0 +go 1.22.1
15-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRemove commented replace directives
The commented replace directives should be removed as they contain local paths and are not being used.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
test/component_test.go (1)
16-21: Consider adding error handling test cases for asArray function.The helper function should include test cases for invalid JSON input.
func asArray(t *testing.T, value string) []string { result := make([]string, 0) err := json.Unmarshal(jsonc.ToJSON([]byte(value)), &result) - assert.NoError(t, err) + require.NoError(t, err, "Failed to parse JSON array: %v", value) return result } +func TestAsArray(t *testing.T) { + tests := []struct { + name string + input string + want []string + wantErr bool + }{ + { + name: "valid array", + input: `["a", "b"]`, + want: []string{"a", "b"}, + wantErr: false, + }, + { + name: "invalid json", + input: `invalid`, + want: nil, + wantErr: true, + }, + } + for _, tt := range tests { + t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) { + if tt.wantErr { + assert.Panics(t, func() { asArray(t, tt.input) }) + } else { + got := asArray(t, tt.input) + assert.Equal(t, tt.want, got) + } + }) + } +}test/fixtures/atmos.yaml (1)
79-87: Fix formatting and enhance test-components command.The command definition has trailing spaces and could be more robust.
commands: - name: "test-components" description: "List the Atmos virtual components configured for testing" steps: - - > - atmos describe stacks --format json --sections=component,metadata --components=component -s sandbox - | jq '.[] | .components.terraform | to_entries | - map(select(.value.component == "component" and (.value.metadata.type != "abstract" or .value.metadata.type == null))) - | .[].key' + - | + atmos describe stacks \ + --format json \ + --sections=component,metadata \ + --components=component \ + -s sandbox | \ + jq -r '.[] | + .components.terraform | + to_entries | + map( + select( + .value.component == "component" and + (.value.metadata.type != "abstract" or .value.metadata.type == null) + ) + ) | + .[].key'🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 85-85: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 86-86: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 87-87: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
test/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
test/component_test.go(1 hunks)test/fixtures/atmos.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/test.yaml(1 hunks)test/go.mod(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
test/fixtures/atmos.yaml
[error] 85-85: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 86-86: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
[error] 87-87: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/test.yaml (2)
11-14: LGTM! Test configuration is well structured.
The test configuration properly defines the test suite, type, and stage, which aligns well with the PR objective of adding tests.
20-28: Consider adding functional tests for public subnet configurations.
While disabling public subnets and NAT gateways is cost-effective for basic testing, consider adding a separate test suite for validating these features, possibly with shorter-lived resources.
Would you like me to help create a separate test configuration for functional testing of public subnet features?
test/fixtures/atmos.yaml (1)
56-60: LGTM! Logging configuration is well defined.
The logging configuration is properly set up with appropriate log levels and output to stdout, which is ideal for test environments.
test/go.mod (2)
6-6: Consider using stable version of test-helpers
The current pre-release version v0.12.1-0.20241226164031-5a0f353392b0 should be replaced with the latest stable version unless specific pre-release features are required.
19-93: LGTM: Dependencies are well-structured
The indirect dependencies are properly declared and versioned, providing a comprehensive set of tools for infrastructure testing.
|
/terratest |
|
/terratest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
test/component_test.go (1)
22-59: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance test coverage with additional test cases.
While the current test thoroughly validates the happy path, consider adding:
- Validation of subnet CIDR ranges (e.g., check if they're within VPC CIDR)
- Validation of route tables and NAT gateway configurations
- Negative test cases (e.g., invalid CIDR blocks, overlapping subnets)
- Edge cases (e.g., maximum number of subnets, boundary values)
Here's a suggested addition for subnet CIDR validation:
t.Run("validate_subnet_cidrs", func(t *testing.T) { private_subnet_cidrs := atmos.OutputList(t, options, "private_subnet_cidrs") require.Equal(t, 2, len(private_subnet_cidrs)) vpcCIDR := *vpc.CidrBlock for _, subnetCIDR := range private_subnet_cidrs { assert.True(t, helper.IsCIDRSubset(subnetCIDR, vpcCIDR), "Subnet CIDR %s should be within VPC CIDR %s", subnetCIDR, vpcCIDR) } // Validate route tables for _, subnetID := range private_subnet_ids { routeTable := aws.GetRouteTableForSubnet(t, subnetID, awsRegion) assert.NotNil(t, routeTable) // Add specific route table validation } })Would you like me to help implement these additional test cases?
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
.gitignore (1)
77-80: Consider standardizing the ignore patterns for better consistency.The new entries should follow the existing pattern of using
**/prefix for consistency with Docker contexts, as noted in the existing comments. Additionally, consider making the patterns more specific and adding comments to explain their purpose.Apply this diff to improve the patterns:
-state -.cache +# Test state files and caches +**/state/ +**/.cache/Rationale:
- Adding
**/prefix maintains consistency with existing patterns- Adding trailing
/clarifies these are directory patterns- Adding a comment explains the purpose of these patterns
- More specific patterns reduce the risk of accidentally ignoring unintended files
test/component_test.go (2)
15-21: Consider enhancing test setup flexibility and safety.While the basic setup is correct, consider these improvements:
- Parameterize the AWS region (e.g., from environment variable) for better flexibility
- Add test context with timeout to prevent hanging tests
Here's how you could enhance it:
+import ( + "context" + "os" + "time" +) func TestComponent(t *testing.T) { - awsRegion := "us-east-2" + awsRegion := os.Getenv("AWS_REGION") + if awsRegion == "" { + awsRegion = "us-east-2" // fallback + } + + ctx, cancel := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 30*time.Minute) + defer cancel() + suites := helper.NewTestSuites(t, "../", awsRegion, "test/fixtures") defer suites.TearDown(t) - suites.SetUp(t, &atmos.Options{}) + suites.SetUp(t, &atmos.Options{Context: ctx})
22-26: Improve test isolation and cleanup reliability.While the test uses
t.Parallel()and has cleanup logic, consider these improvements:
- Add unique suffixes to resource names to prevent conflicts in parallel execution
- Implement cleanup in a separate helper that uses
t.Cleanup()for more reliable resource deletionExample implementation:
t.Parallel() + testID := helper.GenerateUniqueID() + t.Cleanup(func() { + if err := suites.DestroyComponent(t, component, &atmos.Options{}); err != nil { + t.Logf("Failed to cleanup resources: %v", err) + } + }) suites.Test(t, "two-private-subnets", func(t *testing.T) { - component := suites.CreateAndDeployComponent(t, "vpc", "default-test", &atmos.Options{}) + component := suites.CreateAndDeployComponent(t, "vpc", "default-test-"+testID, &atmos.Options{}) - defer suites.DestroyComponent(t, component, &atmos.Options{})
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
test/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
.gitignore(1 hunks)test/.gitignore(1 hunks)test/component_test.go(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/test.yaml(1 hunks)test/go.mod(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- test/.gitignore
- test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/test.yaml
- test/go.mod
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/component_test.go (1)
1-14: LGTM! Well-organized imports.
The imports are properly organized and all are being utilized in the test implementation.
|
/terratest |
|
/terratest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
test/component_test.go (1)
21-69:⚠️ Potential issueCritical: Implement the commented test assertions.
The test case "two-private-subnets" currently only has a trivial assertion (
assert.True(t, true)), while the actual VPC validation code is commented out. This results in a test that doesn't validate any real functionality.The commented code includes important validations for:
- VPC CIDR blocks and configurations
- Subnet creation and accessibility
- Tag verification
- Resource counts
Please uncomment and implement these validations to ensure proper test coverage. As mentioned in the previous review, consider also:
- Implementing private subnet validation
- Adding validation for subnet CIDR ranges
- Including negative test cases
Would you like assistance in implementing these test cases?
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
test/component_test.go (2)
11-18: Consider making AWS region configurable.The AWS region is currently hardcoded. Consider making it configurable through environment variables or test configuration to support different test environments.
+const defaultAwsRegion = "us-east-2" + func TestComponent(t *testing.T) { - awsRegion := "us-east-2" + awsRegion := os.Getenv("TEST_AWS_REGION") + if awsRegion == "" { + awsRegion = defaultAwsRegion + }
21-22: Remove placeholder assertion.The
assert.True(t, true)is a placeholder that should be removed once the actual test assertions are implemented.- assert.True(t, true)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
test/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
test/component_test.go(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml(1 hunks)test/go.mod(1 hunks)test/run.sh(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- test/run.sh
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml
- test/go.mod
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/component_test.go (1)
1-9: LGTM: Package and imports are well-structured.
The package declaration and imports follow Go best practices, with clear organization and appropriate test helper packages.
|
/terratest |
|
/terrratest |
|
/terratest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
test/go.mod (2)
3-3:⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect Go version specified
The Go version 1.23.0 is invalid as it's beyond the latest stable release (1.22.1 as of April 2024).
-go 1.23.0 +go 1.22.1
15-17: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionRemove commented replace directives
The commented replace directives contain local paths and should be removed as they are not being used.
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/private.yaml (1)
16-16: Consider enabling VPC flow logs for security auditingFlow logs are currently disabled. For private VPCs, especially in production environments, it's recommended to enable flow logs to maintain audit trails of network traffic.
- vpc_flow_logs_enabled: false + vpc_flow_logs_enabled: truetest/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/public.yaml (1)
12-13: Consider high availability for NAT gatewaysSingle NAT gateway configuration (
max_nats: 1) might create a single point of failure. For production environments with critical workloads, consider using multiple NAT gateways across availability zones.- max_nats: 1 + max_nats: 2 # One NAT gateway per AZ for high availabilitytest/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/with_ipam.yaml (2)
1-2: Track TODO comment for IPAM module dependencyThe TODO comment indicates a dependency on a future IPAM address pool creation module. This should be tracked to ensure it's not forgotten.
Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track this dependency and the implementation of the IPAM example?
3-21: Consider extracting common VPC configurationThe configuration shares many common values with the private and public VPC configurations. Consider creating a base configuration that can be extended to reduce duplication and maintain consistency.
Example approach:
# base_vpc.yaml components: terraform: vpc/base: metadata: component: vpc vars: subnet_type_tag_key: "eg.cptest.co/subnet/type" max_subnet_count: 3 ipv4_primary_cidr_block: "172.16.0.0/16" # Then extend in specific configurations: imports: - base_vpc.yaml components: terraform: vpc/with_ipam: extends: vpc/base vars: enabled: false # Override only specific valuestest/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/with_flowlogs.yaml (1)
1-1: Address the TODO comment with usage examples.The TODO comment should be addressed by adding examples of how to use the VPC with flow logs. This will improve documentation and help other developers understand the intended usage.
Would you like me to help create usage examples for the VPC flow logs configuration?
test/fixtures/vendor.yaml (1)
33-33: Consider using absolute paths or environment variables for local sources.Using a relative path (
../../src) for the vpc component source could be fragile if the directory structure changes. Consider using an absolute path or environment variable to make it more robust.Example using an environment variable:
- source: "../../src" + source: "${REPO_ROOT}/src"test/component_test.go (3)
27-79: Enhance test coverage for private subnet configuration.While the test case covers basic VPC and subnet validation, consider adding:
- Validation of subnet CIDR ranges against expected values
- Verification of route tables for private subnets
- Validation of subnet tags including the custom
subnet_type_tag_keyExample additions:
// Validate subnet CIDR ranges private_subnet_cidrs := atm.OutputList(component, "private_subnet_cidrs") assert.Equal(t, 2, len(private_subnet_cidrs)) assert.Contains(t, private_subnet_cidrs, "172.16.1.0/24") assert.Contains(t, private_subnet_cidrs, "172.16.2.0/24") // Validate subnet tags subnet := aws.GetSubnetById(t, private_subnet_ids[0], awsRegion) assert.Equal(t, subnet.Tags["eg.cptest.co/subnet/type"], "private")
142-154: Improve error handling in GetNatsByVpcIdE.The error handling could be enhanced by:
- Adding context to returned errors
- Validating input parameters
- Adding logging for debugging purposes
func GetNatsByVpcIdE(t *testing.T, vpcId string, awsRegion string) ([]*ec2.NatGateway, error) { + if vpcId == "" { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("vpcId cannot be empty") + } + if awsRegion == "" { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("awsRegion cannot be empty") + } + client, err := aws.NewEc2ClientE(t, awsRegion) if err != nil { - return nil, err + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to create EC2 client: %w", err) } filter := ec2.Filter{Name: awssdk.String("vpc-id"), Values: []*string{&vpcId}} response, err := client.DescribeNatGateways(&ec2.DescribeNatGatewaysInput{Filter: []*ec2.Filter{&filter}}) if err != nil { - return nil, err + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to describe NAT gateways for VPC %s: %w", vpcId, err) } return response.NatGateways, nil }
27-137: Consider using table-driven tests for subnet configurations.The test cases for different subnet configurations could be refactored to use table-driven tests, reducing code duplication and making it easier to add new test cases.
Example refactor:
testCases := []struct { name string inputs map[string]interface{} expectedSubnets int expectedPublic int expectedPrivate int expectedNats int }{ { name: "two-private-subnets", inputs: map[string]interface{}{ "public_subnets_enabled": false, "nat_gateway_enabled": false, // ... other inputs }, expectedSubnets: 2, expectedPublic: 0, expectedPrivate: 2, expectedNats: 0, }, // ... add more test cases } for _, tc := range testCases { suite.Test(t, tc.name, func(t *testing.T, atm *helper.Atmos) { // ... test implementation }) }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
test/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
test/component_test.go(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/private.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/public.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/with_flowlogs.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/with_ipam.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/tests.yaml(1 hunks)test/fixtures/vendor.yaml(1 hunks)test/go.mod(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/with_flowlogs.yaml
[error] 13-13: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/tests.yaml
[error] 6-6: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
test/go.mod (2)
6-6: Consider using stable version of test-helpers
The current pre-release version v0.12.1-0.20241230101202-621e95c4e9aa should be replaced with the latest stable version unless specific pre-release features are required.
-github.com/cloudposse/test-helpers v0.12.1-0.20241230101202-621e95c4e9aa
+github.com/cloudposse/test-helpers v0.12.021-91: LGTM: Dependencies are well-structured
The indirect dependencies are properly versioned and appear to be pulled in correctly by the main testing packages.
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/private.yaml (1)
8-10: Verify availability zone format
The current AZ format uses only "a" and "b". Ensure this is compatible with your deployment strategy, as typically AWS availability zones are specified with the region prefix (e.g., "us-west-2a").
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for more context about how these availability zones are used in the codebase.
Based on the documentation and code analysis, I can now provide a definitive response about the availability zone format:
Short availability zone notation is fully supported and recommended for reusability
The current format using just "a" and "b" is perfectly valid and actually recommended for better reusability across regions. According to the module's documentation:
- The
availability_zonesinput accepts either full AZ names (e.g., "us-east-1a") or just the suffix (e.g., "a") - Using just the suffix allows for better reusability of configurations across different regions
- The module automatically handles the formatting by prepending the region name if needed
- This is explicitly documented in the variable description: "Can be the full name, e.g.
us-east-1a, or just the part after the region, e.g.ato allow reusable values across regions"
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other AZ configurations in the codebase for consistency
rg -g '*.{yaml,tf}' 'availability_zones:' -A 3
Length of output: 1428
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for patterns related to AZ usage in the code
rg -g '*.{tf,yaml,rb,py,go}' -i 'availability.*zone' -B 2 -A 2
# Also check for any documentation about AZ configuration
fd README.md --exec cat {}
Length of output: 68730
test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/public.yaml (1)
17-18: Review CIDR block allocation strategy
The public VPC uses the same CIDR block (172.16.0.0/16) as the private VPC. This could cause conflicts if these VPCs are intended to be used together or peered.
test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/tests.yaml (2)
5-6: Please clarify the commented imports and fix formatting.
The file has two commented imports (with_ipam and with_flow_logs) without explanation. Consider:
- Adding a comment explaining why these configurations are commented out
- If they're no longer needed, remove them
- If they're temporarily disabled, create a TODO comment with the reason and timeline for re-enabling
Also, there are trailing spaces on line 6 that should be removed.
Apply this diff to fix the formatting:
# - catalog/usecase/with_ipam
-# - catalog/usecase/with_flow_logs
+# - catalog/usecase/with_flow_logsLet's verify if these commented configurations are used elsewhere:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about these configurations to better understand their usage.
Remove commented configurations and fix formatting
Based on the verification:
- The
with_ipam.yamlfile exists but is just a placeholder with a TODO comment indicating it's not yet implemented - The
with_flow_logsconfiguration doesn't exist in the codebase - Both configurations are commented out in the test file and appear to be unused/incomplete features
Recommendations:
- Remove both commented lines since they reference incomplete/non-existent features
- Create separate issues to track the implementation of these features if needed
- Fix the trailing whitespace as suggested
Apply this diff:
-# - catalog/usecase/with_ipam
-# - catalog/usecase/with_flow_logs 🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for references to the commented configurations
echo "Checking for IPAM configuration references:"
rg -l "with_ipam" --type yaml
echo -e "\nChecking for flow logs configuration references:"
rg -l "with_flow_logs" --type yaml
Length of output: 426
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the IPAM configuration file and search for any related test files
echo "Content of with_ipam.yaml:"
cat test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/with_ipam.yaml
echo -e "\nSearching for test files referencing IPAM:"
rg -C 3 "with_ipam" test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/tests.yaml
echo -e "\nSearching for test files referencing flow logs:"
rg -C 3 "with_flow_logs" test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/tests.yaml
Length of output: 1389
🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint (1.35.1)
[error] 6-6: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
1-4: LGTM! Verify test coverage for new configurations.
The new imports for private and public use cases look good.
Let's verify the test coverage in the imported files:
✅ Verification successful
Import configuration verified with adequate test coverage
The imports are correctly configured and provide comprehensive test coverage:
_defaults.yamlsets up the base configuration with proper backend and variable settingsprivate.yamltests VPC configuration without public subnets and NAT gatewayspublic.yamltests VPC configuration with public subnets and NAT gateway enabled
Both private and public use cases provide good test coverage for different VPC configurations:
- Different availability zone combinations (a,b vs b,c)
- Contrasting subnet configurations (public vs private)
- Different NAT configurations (enabled vs disabled)
- Common base settings (CIDR blocks, subnet type tags, etc.)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the new imports exist and contain test configurations
# Check for the existence and content of imported files
echo "Checking _defaults file:"
fd -t f "_defaults.ya?ml" test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test
echo -e "\nChecking private usecase file:"
fd -t f "private.ya?ml" catalog/usecase
echo -e "\nChecking public usecase file:"
fd -t f "public.ya?ml" catalog/usecase
Length of output: 620
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to locate the correct path for the usecase files
echo "Searching for 'catalog' directory:"
fd -t d "catalog"
echo -e "\nSearching for files named private.yaml or public.yaml:"
fd -t f "private.ya?ml|public.ya?ml"
echo -e "\nLet's check the content of _defaults.yaml:"
cat test/fixtures/stacks/orgs/default/test/_defaults.yaml
Length of output: 2936
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the private and public usecase files
echo "Content of private.yaml:"
cat test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/private.yaml
echo -e "\nContent of public.yaml:"
cat test/fixtures/stacks/catalog/usecase/public.yaml
Length of output: 1173
| nat_instance_enabled: false | ||
| subnet_type_tag_key: "eg.cptest.co/subnet/type" | ||
| max_subnet_count: 3 | ||
| vpc_flow_logs_enabled: false |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Verify vpc_flow_logs_enabled setting.
The vpc_flow_logs_enabled is set to false which seems contradictory to the purpose of this fixture file (testing VPC with flow logs). Consider setting this to true to properly test the flow logs functionality.
- vpc_flow_logs_enabled: false
+ vpc_flow_logs_enabled: true📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| vpc_flow_logs_enabled: false | |
| vpc_flow_logs_enabled: true |
|
/terratest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
test/component_test.go (1)
79-134: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd VPC flow logs test coverage
The test suite would benefit from dedicated flow logs testing, as this is a key feature according to the fixtures.
Consider adding a new test case for VPC flow logs as suggested in the previous review.
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
test/component_test.go (3)
17-24: Consider parameterizing the AWS regionWhile the setup is correct, consider making the AWS region configurable through environment variables to support testing in different regions.
- awsRegion := "us-east-2" + awsRegion := os.Getenv("AWS_REGION") + if awsRegion == "" { + awsRegion = "us-east-2" // default region + }
139-151: Add pagination support to NAT gateway retrievalThe current implementation might not retrieve all NAT gateways in large deployments. Consider adding pagination support.
func GetNatsByVpcIdE(t *testing.T, vpcId string, awsRegion string) ([]*ec2.NatGateway, error) { client, err := aws.NewEc2ClientE(t, awsRegion) if err != nil { return nil, err } filter := ec2.Filter{Name: awssdk.String("vpc-id"), Values: []*string{&vpcId}} - response, err := client.DescribeNatGateways(&ec2.DescribeNatGatewaysInput{Filter: []*ec2.Filter{&filter}}) - if err != nil { - return nil, err - } - return response.NatGateways, nil + var allNatGateways []*ec2.NatGateway + input := &ec2.DescribeNatGatewaysInput{ + Filter: []*ec2.Filter{&filter}, + } + + for { + response, err := client.DescribeNatGateways(input) + if err != nil { + return nil, err + } + allNatGateways = append(allNatGateways, response.NatGateways...) + + if response.NextToken == nil { + break + } + input.NextToken = response.NextToken + } + + return allNatGateways, nil }
1-151: Consider test suite organization improvementsWhile the test implementation is solid, consider these architectural improvements:
- Extract test configurations into separate test fixtures for better maintainability
- Add test coverage metrics
- Implement table-driven tests for various VPC configurations
Would you like help implementing any of these improvements?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
test/component_test.go(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/component_test.go (2)
1-15: LGTM: Well-organized imports
The package structure and imports are clean and include all necessary dependencies for AWS infrastructure testing.
26-77: Enhance private subnet test coverage
While the basic test coverage is good, consider adding:
- Validation for private subnet CIDR ranges
- Negative test cases (e.g., invalid CIDR blocks)
Example additions:
// Validate private subnet CIDR ranges
private_subnet_cidrs := atm.OutputList(component, "private_subnet_cidrs")
assert.Equal(t, 2, len(private_subnet_cidrs))
assert.True(t, strings.HasPrefix(private_subnet_cidrs[0], "172.16."))
assert.True(t, strings.HasPrefix(private_subnet_cidrs[1], "172.16."))
// Add negative test case
suite.Test(t, "invalid-cidr", func(t *testing.T, atm *helper.Atmos) {
inputs := map[string]interface{}{
// ... other inputs ...
"ipv4_primary_cidr_block": "invalid-cidr",
}
_, err := atm.GetAndDeployE("vpc/private", "default-test", inputs)
assert.Error(t, err)
})
|
سلام |
what
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Chores
.gitignorefiles.Tests