Support Queue events in tail

[a-robinson]

Queue events have an "event" section containing two fields -- "queue" and "batchSize", which contain the queue name and number of messages in the batch. Queue events can be distinguished from other events by the presence of the "queue" field, so that's what I do here.

I've followed the example of RequestEvent more closely than either ScheduledEvent or AlarmEvent here, but am happy to change up the format if there's a reason to do so.

@OilyLime @jbw1991

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 3fd7eff

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package

Name	Type
wrangler	Minor

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

A wrangler prerelease is available for testing. You can install this latest build in your project with:

npm install --save-dev https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/6460339910/npm-package-wrangler-2397

You can reference the automatically updated head of this PR with:

npm install --save-dev https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/prs/6460339910/npm-package-wrangler-2397

Or you can use npx with this latest build directly:

npx https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/6460339910/npm-package-wrangler-2397 dev path/to/script.js

Additional artifacts:

npm install https://prerelease-registry.devprod.cloudflare.dev/workers-sdk/runs/6460339910/npm-package-cloudflare-pages-shared-2397

Note that these links will no longer work once the GitHub Actions artifact expires.

---

[email protected] includes the following runtime dependencies:

Package	Constraint	Resolved
miniflare	3.20231002.1	3.20231002.1
workerd	1.20231002.0	1.20231002.0
workerd --version	1.20231002.0	2023-10-02

|

Please ensure constraints are pinned, and miniflare/workerd minor versions match.

[JacobMGEvans]

You seem to have your own local formatter/linter setup that is overriding ours, you can run the formatter command and save without formatting, which should clear this up 😃

[a-robinson]

You seem to have your own local formatter/linter setup that is overriding ours, you can run the formatter command and save without formatting, which should clear this up 😃

Ugh it's just the classic "newline at the end of a file" vs "no newline at the end of a file" debate combined with me forgetting to run prettier one last time before sending this up. Should be fixed now, thanks.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #2397 (f5e9415) into main (3077016) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Current head f5e9415 differs from pull request most recent head 3fd7eff. Consider uploading reports for the commit 3fd7eff to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2397      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.35%   75.31%   -0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         223      222       -1     
  Lines       12203    12188      -15     
  Branches     3154     3152       -2     
==========================================
- Hits         9196     9179      -17     
- Misses       3007     3009       +2     

Files	Coverage Δ
packages/wrangler/src/tail/createTail.ts	83.33% <ø> (ø)
packages/wrangler/src/tail/printing.ts	85.18% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

[a-robinson]

Sorry for not knowing offhand who's best to review this, @JacobMGEvans , but would you mind pointing me in the right direction?

[JacobMGEvans]

Sorry for not knowing offhand who's best to review this, @JacobMGEvans , but would you mind pointing me in the right direction?

Anyone from the Wrangler team, I think it just got lost in the notifications

[JacobMGEvans]

Could you also add a changeset please 😊

[a-robinson]

Ugh I'm just now seeing this never made it in :(

I'll take a look at the conflicts soon, hopefully they were just due to support being added for other event types in the meantime.

[a-robinson]

Ok, I think I got the conflicts fixed up appropriately. I'll try to find someone with merge privileges to review after ensuring CI passes.

[penalosa]

Suggested change

	"wrangler": patch
	"wrangler": minor

[penalosa]

This should be a minor not a patch, and it looks like there are still some conflicts, but otherwise looks good!

[a-robinson]

Thanks for the review, @penalosa! Fixed.

[a-robinson]

Looks like CI is happy, should be good to merge whenever you're up for it (I don't have write access or I would myself).