Can I keep cljsjs requires when using "clean ns" ?

[mikavilpas]

Hi, cljsjs provides, as you might know, javascript native packages wrapped with support for clojurescript and the Google closure compiler. The way to use these is to (:require [cljsjs.js-yaml]) which does not add a real namespace (to my understanding) but only requires the native js. Requiring external libraries/functions this way is pretty easy, as they are accessible from js/jsyaml.safeLoad for example.

Clean ns does not understand these requires and deletes them since they are not used (and I don't blame it, they are special). Is there a way I could clean my ns form and keep these special requires around?

[expez]

Is there a way I could clean my ns form and keep these special requires around?

No, but now that you've taught me about these, I might teach clean-ns about them too :)

Do all of these start with the prefix cljsjs? If so I could just tell clean-ns to never prune libspecs with that prefix.

[mikavilpas]

Secret goal achieved, thanks :)

cljsjs is unfortunately not the only way to have external dependencies loaded. A project may use its own externs file which specifies to the closure compiler what things exist in the native js libraries too.

For starters cljsjs would be a great start I think!

A suggestion: is it possible to have metadata for the requires? I'm thinking of a special metadata key that would cause clean-ns to keep the require vector.

[mikavilpas]

Oops, in the last message I meant not pruning anything from cljsjs would be a great start. Just noticed it's not very clear in the message.

[expez]

A suggestion: is it possible to have metadata for the requires? I'm thinking of a special metadata key that would cause clean-ns to keep the require vector.

Yeah, but it kind of sucks that source code has to be changed just to please a refactoring tool.

My guess is that just ignoring cljsjs dependencies will be a pretty good first step. Teaching refactor-nrepl how to read boot.clj and project.clj files to learn about externs in general seems quite difficult :/

[mikavilpas]

Thanks for taking the time to do this! I'll get to using it soon I think.
👍
14.1.2016 12.46 ip. "Lars Andersen" [email protected] kirjoitti:

Closed #275 #275
via clojure-emacs/refactor-nrepl@603dbb4
clojure-emacs/refactor-nrepl@603dbb4
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#275 (comment)
.

[mikavilpas]

Well, I tested it in practice and it seems to work correctly. Thanks again! ❤️

[expez]

Thanks for giving it a spin! 👍