Do not require label on end subroutine statement #1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
climbfuji
approved these changes
Jan 4, 2022
climbfuji
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
Update branch no_arg_mismatch
climbfuji
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 9, 2024
Merged changes from new_variables_input
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I added more test code in temp_calc_adjust.F90 and also made a small change to parse_fortran_file.py (removed an unnecessary check).
I think I have tested all combinations of labeled and unlabeled in
temp_calc_adjust_run.