Inline widget styling

[dkrahn]

Is this a bug report or feature request? (choose one)

🐞 Bug report or documentation improvement

💻 Version of CKEditor

12.0.0

📋 Steps to reproduce

1. Follow the steps from the Inline Widget docs (https://ckeditor.com/docs/ckeditor5/latest/framework/guides/tutorials/implementing-an-inline-widget.html) or (https://ckeditor5.github.io/misc/placeholder-demo/index.html)
2. Try to style all the text

✅ Expected result

From my perspective, it would be desired of the inline widget to be treated as part of the text when it comes to styling(bold, italic, font...).

❎ Actual result

The text around the inline widget get styled but the widget itself does not.

📃 Other details that might be useful

I was able to get around this issue with changing the createContainerElement with createAttributeElement, adding a random id and priority 20.
And then adding the text using the private _insertChild converting elementToElement. But this does not seam right.

---

If you'd like to see this feature implemented, add 👍 to this post.

[Mgsy]

cc @jodator

[jodator]

Right now we do not support this out of the box. I think that view writers should be updated to support isInline=true elements in wrapping in attributes elements but I think that's a broader topic.

//cc @Reinmar & @scofalik.

Edit: I've managed to crate a <strong> inside a placeholder in the view but using private API isn't a good way to do it.
outcome:

<p>
	<strong>Bold </strong>
	<placeholder><strong>{place}</strong></placeholder>
	<strong>.</strong>
</p>

but shouldn't it be?

<p>
	<strong>Bold 
	<placeholder>{place}</placeholder>
	.</strong>
</p>

[dkrahn]

Hi @jodator
IMHO the outcome should be se second one:

<p>
	<strong>Bold 
	<placeholder>{place}</placeholder>
	.</strong>
</p>

And about using the private API, that is exactly why I opened this issue, it doesn't look right.

[Reinmar]

<strong> should definitely be outside <placeholder> in the view. It needs to be done in three steps:

1. First (simplest), you need to use allowAttributesOf: '$text' in your widget's schema definition.
2. Then, we need to make sure that basic styles correctly apply to such elements. Right now, they may be implemented in a way that they only look for text nodes. This needs to be generalised so they look for all inline nodes.
3. Finally, and this is the biggest challenge, if we'll want to render <strong><placeholder/></strong> in the view we need to render a ContainerElement inside an AttributeElement which isn't allowed today. Today, all the code assumes that there's only text or UIElement (and perhaps EmptyElement) in AttributeElements. We may need to either remove that limitation or introduce a new element type.

Anyway, tl;dr is that unfortunately this isn't supported yet and it may not be that easy to introduce (in a stable way).

[pragmaticus]

Any progress on this?

@jodator, @dkrahn I couldn't reproduce the workaround by using the private API. Can you post an example or guide me in the right direction?

[remigasas]

Hello, any update on this ?

Placeholders needs to be styled with font, bold, italic, etc. Their purpose is to provide a block that will be replaced with actual text. Without correct style they are not usable.

[Reinmar]

Not yet. It will be a pretty big change, unfortunately, so we need to find space for it in our roadmap. At the moment, I can't promise anything, but it's high on our wishlist too.

[nikunjtrapasiya]

Any progress on this?

[crypto-dump]

Is there any update on this feature?

[Xusifob]

Hello,

Any information on this feature ? :)

[Xusifob]

I created a workaround for this. It's not optimal but instead of creating <strong> or <em> HTML elements inside the inline widget, I add a strong="true", italic="true" attributes in the widget element. Does the work for me.
You can check it out inside my fork

[dkrahn]

Any updates with the new version?

[QuantumGlitch]

Hi! I will be really interested in this feature too!

[dkrahn]

Hi,
Any estimates or updates on when this issue might get in the roadmap?
Thanks for the great work you all are doing!

[DaveOrDead]

Hey @dkrahn, hit the exact same situation following the tutorial. Are you able to elaborate on how you achieved your workaround as I haven't been able to figure out how to get it working.

I was able to get around this issue with changing the createContainerElement with createAttributeElement, adding a random id and priority 20.
made sense - updated to:

const placeholderView = viewWriter.createAttributeElement(
	"span",
	{class: "placeholder"},
	{ id: "placeholder:my", priority: 20 }
);

but this part:

And then adding the text using the private _insertChild converting elementToElement.

I tried switching

conversion.for("dataDowncast").elementToElement({

in the tutorial for

conversion.for("dataDowncast")._insertChild({

but I get the error
t.for(...)._insertChild is not a function

Any guidance would be great