Introduced Model#createOperationFromJSON

[scofalik]

Suggested merge commit message (convention)

Feature: Introduced Model#createOperationFromJSON which is an alias for OperationFactory#fromJSON. Closes ckeditor/ckeditor5#6094.

---

Additional information

I actually used OperationFactory inside Model#createOperationFromJSON -- less hassle and more backward compatible. If you don't like this solution, I can remove OperationFactory and fix related places (I think it was used in three places in our codebase).

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling 5238082 on i/6094 into b2a8189 on master.

[scofalik]

This change was already tested and accepted by Cloud Services team.

[Reinmar]

I actually used OperationFactory inside Model#createOperationFromJSON -- less hassle and more backward compatible. If you don't like this solution, I can remove OperationFactory and fix related places (I think it was used in three places in our codebase).

What do you think I might not like in using operation factory here? Is there some other option?

[Reinmar]

OMG, I realised that it should be fromJson everywhere... Similarly to toHtml/fromHtml.

[Reinmar]

🤣

[Reinmar]

Fixed in c102fc3. I fixed the same thing in the merge message before but I didn't notice the same mistake in the docs. Static methods need to be referenced ad .foo, not #foo.

[scofalik]

I used createOperationFromJSON because 1) that's how it was used in OperationFactory, two, AFAIR, toJSON is the name of the method for objects serialization.

I wanted to go with Json initially but then I realized it is upper-case in OperationFactory already.

[scofalik]

What do you think I might not like in using operation factory here? Is there some other option?

Another option would be to move the whole functionallity to the Model class. And not keep separate OperationFactory.