Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Appliance Static Routing Resource #182

Open
FlixBus2024 opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Appliance Static Routing Resource #182

FlixBus2024 opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@FlixBus2024
Copy link

FlixBus2024 commented Nov 27, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]
There an API call through which static routing could be configured on the appliances as well but this provider does not have that resource.
Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Here is the link to the API:
https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/create-network-appliance-static-route/
I just wanted to know if it would be possible to also include this feature in the resource section so we can configure the static routing on the firewalls (appliances) through TF.

fmunozmiranda added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 27, 2024
meraki_organizations_policy_objects_groups broken, both the data and resource #178
@FlixBus2024
Copy link
Author

Hello,
Thank you for adding the new resource, not sure if this is finalized, however, I tried it today and got this error:

│ Error: Provider produced inconsistent result after apply │ │ When applying changes to meraki_networks_appliance_static_routes.muc_media_routes, provider │ "provider[\"registry.terraform.io/cisco-open/meraki\"]" produced an unexpected new value: .static_route_id: was null, but now │ cty.StringVal("654e2bdc-7b5b-4a40-9d45-3d896f05aaeb"). │ │ This is a bug in the provider, which should be reported in the provider's own issue tracker. ╵

Thought maybe this could help.
Best

@fmunozmiranda
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for your feedback, we will update it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants