sidetable started as a supercharged combination of pandas value_counts
plus crosstab
that builds simple but useful summary tables of your pandas DataFrame. It has since expanded
to provide support for common and useful pandas tasks such as adding subtotals to your
DataFrame or flattening hierarchical columns.
Usage is straightforward. Install and import sidetable
. Then access it through the
new .stb
accessor on your DataFrame.
For the Titanic data: df.stb.freq(['class'])
will build a frequency table like this:
class | count | percent | cumulative_count | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | Third | 491 | 55.1066 | 491 | 55.1066 |
1 | First | 216 | 24.2424 | 707 | 79.349 |
2 | Second | 184 | 20.651 | 891 | 100 |
You can also summarize missing values with df.stb.missing()
:
missing | total | percent | |
---|---|---|---|
deck | 688 | 891 | 77.2166 |
age | 177 | 891 | 19.8653 |
embarked | 2 | 891 | 0.224467 |
embark_town | 2 | 891 | 0.224467 |
survived | 0 | 891 | 0 |
pclass | 0 | 891 | 0 |
sex | 0 | 891 | 0 |
sibsp | 0 | 891 | 0 |
parch | 0 | 891 | 0 |
fare | 0 | 891 | 0 |
class | 0 | 891 | 0 |
who | 0 | 891 | 0 |
adult_male | 0 | 891 | 0 |
alive | 0 | 891 | 0 |
alone | 0 | 891 | 0 |
You can group the data and add subtotals and grand totals with stb.subtotal()
:
df.groupby(['sex', 'class']).agg({'fare': ['sum']}).stb.subtotal()
fare | ||
---|---|---|
sum | ||
sex | class | |
female | First | 9975.8250 |
Second | 1669.7292 | |
Third | 2321.1086 | |
female - subtotal | 13966.6628 | |
male | First | 8201.5875 |
Second | 2132.1125 | |
Third | 4393.5865 | |
male - subtotal | 14727.2865 | |
grand_total | 28693.9493 |
You can also turn a hierarchical column structure into this:
titanic.groupby(['embark_town', 'class', 'sex']).agg({'fare': ['sum'], 'age': ['mean']}).unstack().stb.flatten()
embark_town | class | fare_sum_female | fare_sum_male | age_mean_female | age_mean_male | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | Cherbourg | First | 4972.53 | 3928.54 | 36.0526 | 40.1111 |
1 | Cherbourg | Second | 176.879 | 254.212 | 19.1429 | 25.9375 |
2 | Cherbourg | Third | 337.983 | 402.146 | 14.0625 | 25.0168 |
3 | Queenstown | First | 90 | 90 | 33 | 44 |
4 | Queenstown | Second | 24.7 | 12.35 | 30 | 57 |
5 | Queenstown | Third | 340.159 | 465.046 | 22.85 | 28.1429 |
6 | Southampton | First | 4753.29 | 4183.05 | 32.7045 | 41.8972 |
7 | Southampton | Second | 1468.15 | 1865.55 | 29.7197 | 30.8759 |
8 | Southampton | Third | 1642.97 | 3526.39 | 23.2237 | 26.5748 |
sidetable has several useful features:
- See total counts and their relative percentages in one table. This is roughly equivalent to combining the
output of
value_counts()
andvalue_counts(normalize=True)
into one table. - Include cumulative totals and percentages to better understand your thresholds. The Pareto principle applies to many different scenarios and this function makes it easy to see how your data is cumulatively distributed.
- Aggregate multiple columns together to see frequency counts for grouped data.
- Provide a threshold point above which all data is grouped into a single bucket. This is useful for quickly identifying the areas to focus your analysis.
- Get a count of the missing values in your data.
- Count the number of unique values for each column.
- Add grand totals on any DataFrame and subtotals to any grouped DataFrame.
- Pretty print columns
For the impatient:
$ python -m pip install sidetable
import sidetable
import pandas as pd
# Create your DataFrame
df = pd.read_csv(myfile.csv)
# Build a frequency table for one or more columns
df.stb.freq(['column1', 'column2'])
# See what data is missing
df.stb.missing()
# Group data and add a subtotal
df.groupby(['column1', 'column2'])['col3'].sum().stb.subtotal()
That's it.
Read on for more details and more examples of what you can do sidetable.
The idea behind sidetable is that there are a handful of useful data analysis tasks that you might run on any data set early in the data analysis process. While each of these tasks can be done in a handful of lines of pandas code, it is a lot of typing and difficult to remember.
In addition to providing useful functionality, this project is also a test to see how to build custom accessors using some of pandas relatively new API. I am hopeful this can serve as a model for other projects whether open source or just for your own usage. Please check out the release announcement for more information about the usage and how to use this as a model for your own projects.
The solutions in sidetable are heavily based on three sources:
- This tweet thread by Peter Baumgartner
- An excellent article by Steve Miller that lays out many of the code concepts incorporated into sidetable.
- Ted Petrou's post on finding the percentage of missing values in a DataFrame.
I very much appreciate the work that all three authors did to point me in this direction.
$ python -m pip install -U sidetable
This is the preferred method to install sidetable, as it will always install the most recent stable release. sidetable requires pandas 1.0 or higher and no additional dependencies. It should run anywhere that pandas runs.
If you prefer to use conda, sidetable is available on conda-forge:
$ conda install -c conda-forge sidetable
import pandas as pd
import sidetable
import seaborn as sns
df = sns.load_dataset('titanic')
sidetable uses the pandas DataFrame accessor api
to add a .stb
accessor to all of your DataFrames. Once you import sidetable
you are ready to
go. In these examples, I will be using seaborn's Titanic dataset as an example but
seaborn is not a direct dependency.
If you have used value_counts()
before, you have probably wished it were easier to
combine the values with percentage distribution.
df['class'].value_counts()
Third 491
First 216
Second 184
Name: class, dtype: int64
df['class'].value_counts(normalize=True)
Third 0.551066
First 0.242424
Second 0.206510
Name: class, dtype: float64
Which can be done, but is messy and a lot of typing and remembering:
pd.concat([df['class'].value_counts().rename('count'),
df['class'].value_counts(normalize=True).mul(100).rename('percentage')], axis=1)
count | percentage | |
---|---|---|
Third | 491 | 55.1066 |
First | 216 | 24.2424 |
Second | 184 | 20.651 |
Using sidetable is much simpler and you get cumulative totals, percents and more flexibility:
df.stb.freq(['class'])
class | count | percent | cumulative_count | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | Third | 491 | 55.1066 | 491 | 55.1066 |
1 | First | 216 | 24.2424 | 707 | 79.349 |
2 | Second | 184 | 20.651 | 891 | 100 |
If you want to style the results so percentages and large numbers are easier to read,
use style=True
:
df.stb.freq(['class'], style=True)
class | count | percent | cumulative_count | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | Third | 491 | 55.11% | 491 | 55.11% |
1 | First | 216 | 24.24% | 707 | 79.35% |
2 | Second | 184 | 20.65% | 891 | 100.00% |
In addition, you can group columns together. If we want to see the breakdown among class and sex:
df.stb.freq(['sex', 'class'])
sex | class | count | percent | cumulative_count | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | male | Third | 347 | 38.945 | 347 | 38.945 |
1 | female | Third | 144 | 16.1616 | 491 | 55.1066 |
2 | male | First | 122 | 13.6925 | 613 | 68.7991 |
3 | male | Second | 108 | 12.1212 | 721 | 80.9203 |
4 | female | First | 94 | 10.5499 | 815 | 91.4703 |
5 | female | Second | 76 | 8.52974 | 891 | 100 |
You can use as many groupings as you would like.
By default, sidetable counts the data. However, you can specify a value
argument to
indicate that the data should be summed based on the data in another column.
For this data set, we can see how the fares are distributed by class:
df.stb.freq(['class'], value='fare')
class | fare | percent | cumulative_fare | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | First | 18177.4 | 63.3493 | 18177.4 | 63.3493 |
1 | Third | 6714.7 | 23.4011 | 24892.1 | 86.7504 |
2 | Second | 3801.84 | 13.2496 | 28693.9 | 100 |
Another feature of sidetable is that you can specify a threshold. For many data analysis,
you may want to break down into large groupings to focus on and ignore others. You can use
the thresh
argument to define a threshold and group all entries above that threshold
into an "other" grouping:
df.stb.freq(['class', 'who'], value='fare', thresh=80)
class | who | fare | percent | cumulative_fare | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | First | woman | 9492.94 | 33.0834 | 9492.94 | 33.0834 |
1 | First | man | 7848.18 | 27.3513 | 17341.1 | 60.4348 |
2 | Third | man | 3617.53 | 12.6073 | 20958.6 | 73.042 |
3 | Second | man | 1886.36 | 6.57406 | 22845 | 79.6161 |
4 | others | others | 5848.95 | 20.3839 | 28693.9 | 100 |
You can further customize by specifying the label to use for all the others:
df.stb.freq(['class', 'who'], value='fare', thresh=80, other_label='All others')
class | who | fare | percent | cumulative_fare | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | First | woman | 9492.94 | 33.0834 | 9492.94 | 33.0834 |
1 | First | man | 7848.18 | 27.3513 | 17341.1 | 60.4348 |
2 | Third | man | 3617.53 | 12.6073 | 20958.6 | 73.042 |
3 | Second | man | 1886.36 | 6.57406 | 22845 | 79.6161 |
4 | All others | All others | 5848.95 | 20.3839 | 28693.9 | 100 |
The counts()
function shows how many unique values are in each column as well as
the most and least frequent values & their total counts. This summary view can help you determine if you need
to convert data to a categorical value. It can also help you understand the high
level structure of your data.
df.stb.counts()
count | unique | most_freq | most_freq_count | least_freq | least_freq_count | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
survived | 891 | 2 | 0 | 549 | 1 | 342 |
sex | 891 | 2 | male | 577 | female | 314 |
adult_male | 891 | 2 | True | 537 | False | 354 |
alive | 891 | 2 | no | 549 | yes | 342 |
alone | 891 | 2 | True | 537 | False | 354 |
pclass | 891 | 3 | 3 | 491 | 2 | 184 |
embarked | 889 | 3 | S | 644 | Q | 77 |
class | 891 | 3 | Third | 491 | Second | 184 |
who | 891 | 3 | man | 537 | child | 83 |
embark_town | 889 | 3 | Southampton | 644 | Queenstown | 77 |
sibsp | 891 | 7 | 0 | 608 | 5 | 5 |
parch | 891 | 7 | 0 | 678 | 6 | 1 |
deck | 203 | 7 | C | 59 | G | 4 |
age | 714 | 88 | 24.0 | 30 | 20.5 | 1 |
fare | 891 | 248 | 8.05 | 43 | 63.3583 | 1 |
By default, all data types are included but you may use the exclude
and include
parameters
to select specific types of columns. The syntax is the same as pandas
select_dtypes
For example,
df.stb.counts(exclude='number')
count | unique | most_freq | most_freq_count | least_freq | least_freq_count | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
sex | 891 | 2 | male | 577 | female | 314 |
adult_male | 891 | 2 | True | 537 | False | 354 |
alive | 891 | 2 | no | 549 | yes | 342 |
alone | 891 | 2 | True | 537 | False | 354 |
embarked | 889 | 3 | S | 644 | Q | 77 |
class | 891 | 3 | Third | 491 | Second | 184 |
who | 891 | 3 | man | 537 | child | 83 |
embark_town | 889 | 3 | Southampton | 644 | Queenstown | 77 |
deck | 203 | 7 | C | 59 | G | 4 |
sidetable also includes a summary table that shows the missing values in your data by count and percentage of total missing values in a column.
df.stb.missing()
missing | total | percent | |
---|---|---|---|
deck | 688 | 891 | 77.2166 |
age | 177 | 891 | 19.8653 |
embarked | 2 | 891 | 0.224467 |
embark_town | 2 | 891 | 0.224467 |
survived | 0 | 891 | 0 |
pclass | 0 | 891 | 0 |
sex | 0 | 891 | 0 |
sibsp | 0 | 891 | 0 |
parch | 0 | 891 | 0 |
fare | 0 | 891 | 0 |
class | 0 | 891 | 0 |
who | 0 | 891 | 0 |
adult_male | 0 | 891 | 0 |
alive | 0 | 891 | 0 |
alone | 0 | 891 | 0 |
If you wish to see the results with styles applied to the Percent and Total column, use:
df.stb.missing(style=True)
missing | total | percent | |
---|---|---|---|
deck | 688 | 891 | 77.22% |
age | 177 | 891 | 19.87% |
embarked | 2 | 891 | 0.22% |
embark_town | 2 | 891 | 0.22% |
survived | 0 | 891 | 0 |
pclass | 0 | 891 | 0 |
sex | 0 | 891 | 0 |
sibsp | 0 | 891 | 0 |
parch | 0 | 891 | 0 |
fare | 0 | 891 | 0 |
class | 0 | 891 | 0 |
who | 0 | 891 | 0 |
adult_male | 0 | 891 | 0 |
alive | 0 | 891 | 0 |
alone | 0 | 891 | 0 |
Finally, you can exclude the columns that have 0 missing values using
the clip_0=True
parameter:
df.stb.missing(clip_0=True, style=True)
missing | total | percent | |
---|---|---|---|
deck | 688 | 891 | 77.22% |
age | 177 | 891 | 19.87% |
embarked | 2 | 891 | 0.22% |
embark_town | 2 | 891 | 0.22% |
Another useful function is the subtotal function. Trying to add a subtotal
to grouped pandas data is not easy. sidetable adds a subtotal()
function that
makes adds a subtotal at one or more levels of a DataFrame.
The subtotal function can be applied to a simple DataFrame in order to add a Grand Total label:
df.stb.subtotal()
survived | pclass | sex | age | sibsp | parch | fare | embarked | class | who | adult_male | deck | embark_town | alive | alone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
887 | 1 | 1 | female | 19 | 0 | 0 | 30 | S | First | woman | 0 | B | Southampton | yes | 1 |
888 | 0 | 3 | female | nan | 1 | 2 | 23.45 | S | Third | woman | 0 | nan | Southampton | no | 0 |
889 | 1 | 1 | male | 26 | 0 | 0 | 30 | C | First | man | 1 | C | Cherbourg | yes | 1 |
890 | 0 | 3 | male | 32 | 0 | 0 | 7.75 | Q | Third | man | 1 | nan | Queenstown | no | 1 |
grand_total | 342 | 2057 | nan | 21205.2 | 466 | 340 | 28693.9 | nan | nan | nan | 537 | nan | nan | nan | 537 |
The real power of subtotal is being able to add it to one or more levels of your grouped data. For example, you can group the data and add a subtotal at each level:
df.groupby(['sex', 'class', 'embark_town']).agg({'fare': ['sum']}).stb.subtotal()
Which yields this view (truncated for simplicity):
fare | |||
---|---|---|---|
sum | |||
sex | class | embark_town | |
female | First | Cherbourg | 4972.5333 |
Queenstown | 90.0000 | ||
Southampton | 4753.2917 | ||
female | First - subtotal | 9815.8250 | ||
Second | Cherbourg | 176.8792 | |
Queenstown | 24.7000 | ||
Southampton | 1468.1500 | ||
female | Second - subtotal | 1669.7292 | ||
Third | Cherbourg | 337.9833 | |
Queenstown | 340.1585 | ||
Southampton | 1642.9668 | ||
female | Third - subtotal | 2321.1086 | ||
female - subtotal | 13806.6628 | ||
male | First | Cherbourg | 3928.5417 |
Queenstown | 90.0000 |
By default, every level in the DataFrame will be subtotaled but you can control this behavior
by using the sub_level
argument. For instance, you can subtotal on sex
and class
by
passing the argument sub_level=[1,2]
summary_table = df.groupby(['sex', 'class', 'embark_town']).agg({'fare': ['sum']})
summary_table.stb.subtotal(sub_level=[1, 2])
The subtotal
function also allows the user to configure the labels and separators used in
the subtotal and Grand Total by using the grand_label
, sub_label
, show_sep
and sep
arguments.
When grouping and pivoting data, you can end up with a DataFrame that has a multiindex. Often times, you want a simple flat representation of the data.
For example, we can build a table using a groupby()
plus unstack()
that looks like this:
df.groupby(['embark_town', 'class', 'sex']).agg({'fare': ['sum'], 'age': ['mean']}).unstack()
fare | age | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
sum | mean | ||||
sex | female | male | female | male | |
embark_town | class | ||||
Cherbourg | First | 4972.5333 | 3928.5417 | 36.052632 | 40.111111 |
Second | 176.8792 | 254.2125 | 19.142857 | 25.937500 | |
Third | 337.9833 | 402.1462 | 14.062500 | 25.016800 | |
Queenstown | First | 90.0000 | 90.0000 | 33.000000 | 44.000000 |
Second | 24.7000 | 12.3500 | 30.000000 | 57.000000 | |
Third | 340.1585 | 465.0458 | 22.850000 | 28.142857 | |
Southampton | First | 4753.2917 | 4183.0458 | 32.704545 | 41.897188 |
Second | 1468.1500 | 1865.5500 | 29.719697 | 30.875889 | |
Third | 1642.9668 | 3526.3945 | 23.223684 | 26.574766 |
If you wish to flatten it, use stb.flatten()
:
df.groupby(['embark_town', 'class', 'sex']).agg({'fare': ['sum'], 'age': ['mean']}).unstack().stb.flatten()
embark_town | class | fare_sum_female | fare_sum_male | age_mean_female | age_mean_male | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | Cherbourg | First | 4972.53 | 3928.54 | 36.0526 | 40.1111 |
1 | Cherbourg | Second | 176.879 | 254.212 | 19.1429 | 25.9375 |
2 | Cherbourg | Third | 337.983 | 402.146 | 14.0625 | 25.0168 |
3 | Queenstown | First | 90 | 90 | 33 | 44 |
4 | Queenstown | Second | 24.7 | 12.35 | 30 | 57 |
5 | Queenstown | Third | 340.159 | 465.046 | 22.85 | 28.1429 |
6 | Southampton | First | 4753.29 | 4183.05 | 32.7045 | 41.8972 |
7 | Southampton | Second | 1468.15 | 1865.55 | 29.7197 | 30.8759 |
8 | Southampton | Third | 1642.97 | 3526.39 | 23.2237 | 26.5748 |
flatten will also take additional arguments:
- Add a custom separator using the
sep
argument -stb.flatten(sep='|')
- Control whether or not to reset the index using
reset
argument -stb.flatten(reset=False)
- Reorganize the output levels using
levels
argumentlevels=2
levels
can also take a list of valid levels if you want to reorganize the displaylevels=[0,2]
fares = df.groupby(['embark_town', 'class', 'sex']).agg({'fare': ['sum'], 'age': ['mean']}).unstack()
fares.stb.flatten(sep='|', reset=False, levels=[0,2])
fare|female | fare|male | fare|female | fare|male | age|female | age|male | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
embark_town | class | ||||||
Cherbourg | First | 4972.5333 | 3928.5417 | 115.640309 | 93.536707 | 36.052632 | 40.111111 |
Second | 176.8792 | 254.2125 | 25.268457 | 25.421250 | 19.142857 | 25.937500 | |
Third | 337.9833 | 402.1462 | 14.694926 | 9.352237 | 14.062500 | 25.016800 | |
Queenstown | First | 90.0000 | 90.0000 | 90.000000 | 90.000000 | 33.000000 | 44.000000 |
Second | 24.7000 | 12.3500 | 12.350000 | 12.350000 | 30.000000 | 57.000000 | |
Third | 340.1585 | 465.0458 | 10.307833 | 11.924251 | 22.850000 | 28.142857 | |
Southampton | First | 4753.2917 | 4183.0458 | 99.026910 | 52.949947 | 32.704545 | 41.897188 |
Second | 1468.1500 | 1865.5500 | 21.912687 | 19.232474 | 29.719697 | 30.875889 | |
Third | 1642.9668 | 3526.3945 | 18.670077 | 13.307149 | 23.223684 | 26.574766 |
This function interprets the magnitude of your numeric results and returns a nicely formatted version of all the numbers. This can be used on a full DataFrame or during your analysis of aggregated data.
For instance, if you are summarizing data, you may get something that looks like this:
df.groupby(['pclass', 'sex']).agg({'fare': 'sum'})
fare | ||
---|---|---|
pclass | sex | |
1 | female | 9975.8250 |
male | 8201.5875 | |
2 | female | 1669.7292 |
male | 2132.1125 | |
3 | female | 2321.1086 |
male | 4393.5865 |
Use stb.pretty()
to format it nicely so you can have the same order or magnitude for all numbers:
df.groupby(['pclass', 'sex']).agg({'fare': 'sum'}).div(df['fare'].sum()).stb.pretty()
fare | ||
---|---|---|
pclass | sex | |
1 | female | 9.98k |
male | 8.20k | |
2 | female | 1.67k |
male | 2.13k | |
3 | female | 2.32k |
male | 4.39k |
Here's an example of a percentage format:
df.groupby(['pclass', 'sex']).agg({'fare': 'sum'}).div(df['fare'].sum()).stb.pretty(precision=0, caption="Fare Percentage")
fare | ||
---|---|---|
pclass | sex | |
1 | female | 35% |
male | 29% | |
2 | female | 6% |
male | 7% | |
3 | female | 8% |
male | 15% |
Behind the scenes, pretty
will attempt to normalize the values. You can control the
precision
, rows
add a caption
.
sidetable supports grouping on any data type in a pandas DataFrame. This means that you could try something like:
df.stb.freq(['fare'])
In some cases where there are a fairly small discrete number of this may be useful. However, if you have a lot of unique values, you should bin the data first. In the example, above the data would include 248 rows and not be terribly useful.
One alternative could be:
df['fare_bin'] = pd.qcut(df['fare'], q=4, labels=['low', 'medium', 'high', 'x-high'])
df.stb.freq(['fare_bin'])
fare_bin | count | percent | cumulative_count | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | medium | 224 | 25.1403 | 224 | 25.1403 |
1 | low | 223 | 25.0281 | 447 | 50.1684 |
2 | x-high | 222 | 24.9158 | 669 | 75.0842 |
3 | high | 222 | 24.9158 | 891 | 100 |
The other caveat is that null or missing values can cause data to drop out while aggregating.
For instance, if we look at the deck
variable, there are a lot of missing values.
df.stb.freq(['deck'])
deck | count | percent | cumulative_count | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | C | 59 | 29.064 | 59 | 29.064 |
1 | B | 47 | 23.1527 | 106 | 52.2167 |
2 | D | 33 | 16.2562 | 139 | 68.4729 |
3 | E | 32 | 15.7635 | 171 | 84.2365 |
4 | A | 15 | 7.38916 | 186 | 91.6256 |
5 | F | 13 | 6.40394 | 199 | 98.0296 |
6 | G | 4 | 1.97044 | 203 | 100 |
The total cumulative count only goes up to 203 not the 891 we have seen in other examples.
Future versions of sidetable may handle this differently. For now, it is up to you to
decide how best to handle unknowns. For example, this version of the Titanic data set
has a categorical value for deck
so using fillna
requires an extra step:
df['deck_fillna'] = df['deck'].cat.add_categories('UNK').fillna('UNK')
df.stb.freq(['deck_fillna'])
deck_fillna | count | percent | cumulative_count | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | UNK | 688 | 77.2166 | 688 | 77.2166 |
1 | C | 59 | 6.62177 | 747 | 83.8384 |
2 | B | 47 | 5.27497 | 794 | 89.1134 |
3 | D | 33 | 3.7037 | 827 | 92.8171 |
4 | E | 32 | 3.59147 | 859 | 96.4085 |
5 | A | 15 | 1.6835 | 874 | 98.092 |
6 | F | 13 | 1.45903 | 887 | 99.5511 |
7 | G | 4 | 0.448934 | 891 | 100 |
Another variant is that there might be certain groupings where there are no valid counts.
For instance, if we look at the deck
and class
:
df.stb.freq(['deck', 'class'])
deck | class | count | percent | cumulative_count | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | C | First | 59 | 29.064 | 59 | 29.064 |
1 | B | First | 47 | 23.1527 | 106 | 52.2167 |
2 | D | First | 29 | 14.2857 | 135 | 66.5025 |
3 | E | First | 25 | 12.3153 | 160 | 78.8177 |
4 | A | First | 15 | 7.38916 | 175 | 86.2069 |
5 | F | Second | 8 | 3.94089 | 183 | 90.1478 |
6 | F | Third | 5 | 2.46305 | 188 | 92.6108 |
7 | G | Third | 4 | 1.97044 | 192 | 94.5813 |
8 | E | Second | 4 | 1.97044 | 196 | 96.5517 |
9 | D | Second | 4 | 1.97044 | 200 | 98.5222 |
10 | E | Third | 3 | 1.47783 | 203 | 100 |
There are only 11 combinations. If we want to see all - even if there are not any passengers
fitting that criteria, use clip_0=False
df.stb.freq(['deck', 'class'], clip_0=False)
deck | class | count | percent | cumulative_count | cumulative_percent | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | C | First | 59 | 29.064 | 59 | 29.064 |
1 | B | First | 47 | 23.1527 | 106 | 52.2167 |
2 | D | First | 29 | 14.2857 | 135 | 66.5025 |
3 | E | First | 25 | 12.3153 | 160 | 78.8177 |
4 | A | First | 15 | 7.38916 | 175 | 86.2069 |
5 | F | Second | 8 | 3.94089 | 183 | 90.1478 |
6 | F | Third | 5 | 2.46305 | 188 | 92.6108 |
7 | G | Third | 4 | 1.97044 | 192 | 94.5813 |
8 | E | Second | 4 | 1.97044 | 196 | 96.5517 |
9 | D | Second | 4 | 1.97044 | 200 | 98.5222 |
10 | E | Third | 3 | 1.47783 | 203 | 100 |
11 | G | Second | 0 | 0 | 203 | 100 |
12 | G | First | 0 | 0 | 203 | 100 |
13 | F | First | 0 | 0 | 203 | 100 |
14 | D | Third | 0 | 0 | 203 | 100 |
15 | C | Third | 0 | 0 | 203 | 100 |
16 | C | Second | 0 | 0 | 203 | 100 |
17 | B | Third | 0 | 0 | 203 | 100 |
18 | B | Second | 0 | 0 | 203 | 100 |
19 | A | Third | 0 | 0 | 203 | 100 |
20 | A | Second | 0 | 0 | 203 | 100 |
In many cases this might be too much data, but sometimes the fact that a combination is missing could be insightful.
The final caveat relates to subtotal
. When working with the subtotal
function, sidetable
convert a Categorical MultiIndex to a plain index in order to easily add the subtotal labels.
- Handle NaN values more effectively
- Offer binning options for continuous variables
- Offer more options, maybe plotting?
Contributions are welcome, and they are greatly appreciated! Every little bit helps, and credit will always be given. If you have a new idea for a simple table that we should add, please submit a ticket.
For more info please click here
This package was created with Cookiecutter and the oldani/cookiecutter-simple-pypackage
project template.
The code used in this package is heavily based on the posts from Peter Baumgartner, Steve Miller
and Ted Petrou. Thank you!
- Cookiecutter
- oldani/cookiecutter-simple-pypackage
- Peter Baumgartner - tweet thread
- Steve Miller - article
- Ted Petrou - post