Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(GH-994) Add ignore-pinned switch to outdated command. #1123

Conversation

paulhunttech
Copy link

@paulhunttech paulhunttech commented Jan 3, 2017

Previously the 'choco outdated' command listed all packages regardless
of whether they were pinned or not. Add an 'ignore-pinned' switch that
skips checking available upgrades for all packages that are pinned.

Closes #994

@ferventcoder
Copy link
Member

You may also want to update tab completion with the new field -

outdated = "-? --source='' --user= --password=" + $allcommands

@ferventcoder
Copy link
Member

Please also change the commit from [GH-994] to (GH-994) for consistency. Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@ferventcoder ferventcoder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Make those requested changes and this will be good to go.

@ferventcoder ferventcoder changed the title [GH-994] Add ignore-pinned switch to outdated command. (GH-994) Add ignore-pinned switch to outdated command. Jan 3, 2017
Previously the 'choco outdated' command listed all packages regardless
of whether they were pinned or not. Add an 'ignore-pinned' switch that
skips checking available upgrades for all packages that are pinned.

(chocolateyGH-994) Add ignore-pinned switch to outdated command.

Previously the 'choco outdated' command listed all packages regardless
of whether they were pinned or not. Add an 'ignore-pinned' switch that
skips checking available upgrades for all packages that are pinned.
@paulhunttech paulhunttech force-pushed the woodburysoft/AddOutdatedSwitchToIgnorePinnedPackages branch from e3d3cba to cdd49e8 Compare January 4, 2017 08:00
@paulhunttech
Copy link
Author

I've now made the requested changes.

Copy link
Member

@ferventcoder ferventcoder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@ferventcoder
Copy link
Member

Thanks for your contribution! Rebased onto stable, fixed up the merge conflicts and merged at 5e4d9a6.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants