-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 905
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For actions that allows retrying, let the user retry again #189
Comments
I'm currently looking into this; if we're to allow users to manually retry, they should know what they are retrying. Right now, Chocolatey does not tell you what it's attempting to do, only what the error was. I would suggest a slightly different output, that tries to keep the operation hidden until the user needs to know what the operation is:
What do you think? The alternative would be to say what the operation is upfront; it would be easier to understand but would also greatly clutter the output (there are 7 instances of retryable file system operations) |
Quick FYI; this will be pending for #181 since I need the All tests are green, here's where it's at:
By the way, is this helping at all? |
Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward? |
Dear contributor, As this issue seems to have been inactive for quite some time now, it has been automatically closed. |
Most of the time, if an action has to be retried, it's because A) the software is still running, or B) some of the uninstall actions are taking longer than expected, or C) I have a file opened in some software, e.g. a config file opened in a text editor.
In many cases, the user could solve the issue and retry; by now "ignoring" the error, we leave junk that could be avoided.
Suggestion:
Maximum tries of 3 reached. Try again? (Yes/No):
Example of what it currently does:
For more details: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/chocolatey/UVncL7PxXRg
(Moved from chocolatey-archive/chocolatey#697)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: