Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Magisk Alpha" magisk fork patching fails #301

Closed
cawilliamson opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

"Magisk Alpha" magisk fork patching fails #301

cawilliamson opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@cawilliamson
Copy link

cawilliamson commented Jun 3, 2024

Hello!

This is a long shot but I use a Magisk fork called "Magisk Alpha" which has worked via avbroot auto-patching (using the APK) until now when it suddenly fails.

I've attached the actual APK to this ticket but I'm not 100% sure where the source is - it used to be open source and I believe the source is still out there somewhere but I'm not sure where.

When attempting to patch with this I get:

  2.770s  INFO Replacing zip entry: META-INF/com/android/otacert
  2.770s  INFO Copying zip entry: apex_info.pb
  2.770s  INFO Copying zip entry: care_map.pb
  2.770s  INFO Patching zip entry: payload.bin
  2.770s  INFO Extracting from original payload: boot
  2.871s  INFO Extracting from original payload: vendor_boot
  2.974s  INFO Extracting from original payload: system
  4.746s  INFO Extracting from original payload: vbmeta
  4.747s  INFO Extracting from original payload: init_boot
  4.822s  INFO Patching boot images: boot, init_boot, vendor_boot
  5.145s ERROR Failed to patch OTA zip

Caused by:
    0: Failed to patch payload: payload.bin
    1: Failed to patch boot images: boot, init_boot, vendor_boot
    2: Zip error
    3: specified file not found in archive

I did compile avbroot with your patch for the 27003 version of magisk also just to test but get the same result. It seems like it's looking for a missing partition "specified file not found in archive" but if I install with their previous version of magisk alpha OR the latest official magisk build it patches just fine. Bit odd.

EDIT: I had to rename the APK to a ZIP in order to attach it to the ticket. Please feel free to rename and test if you wish. This isn't my fork though so no worries if it's a case of "We don't support this, go away!" :)

AlphaMagisk-c6f07625-27002.zip

@chenxiaolong
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for reporting this! I think the problem is just that they're sticking with the 27002 version number, similar to upstream Magisk's CI (master branch) builds. So now there's 27002 with the old behavior and 27002 with the new behavior.

Maybe I can find a way to improve avbroot's detection instead of just relying on version numbers. At the very least, I'll be fixing the error message so that specified file not found in archive actually specifies what file is missing :)

In the meantime, since you're building from source already, I bet that changing this line from 27003.. to 27002.. will fix the problem: https://github.com/chenxiaolong/avbroot/pull/268/files#diff-224aa9709fc987f31ed7b355dc79c99ea36488d9b6e3de99eab03cdaec1070feR160. I'll verify after work today.

chenxiaolong added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2024
`specified file not found in archive` is a useless error message when
there's no additional context.

Issue: #301

Signed-off-by: Andrew Gunnerson <[email protected]>
@chenxiaolong
Copy link
Owner

#268 now fixes both issues. avbroot's support for Magisk's new file structure no longer depends on the version number and the error messages now indicate which file was not found:

  1.547s ERROR Failed to patch OTA zip

Caused by:
    0: Failed to patch payload: payload.bin
    1: Failed to patch boot images: boot, init_boot, vendor_boot
    2: Zip error for entry name: "lib/arm64-v8a/libmagisk64.so"
    3: specified file not found in archive

chenxiaolong added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2024
`specified file not found in archive` is a useless error message when
there's no additional context.

Issue: #301

Signed-off-by: Andrew Gunnerson <[email protected]>
@chenxiaolong chenxiaolong self-assigned this Jun 3, 2024
@cawilliamson
Copy link
Author

cawilliamson commented Jun 4, 2024

@chenxiaolong That is absolutely awesome - patched and flashed successfully now!

One concern - once I boot and launch Magisk I'm greeted with the dreaded "I need to flash again, recovery can't detect..." type message which is strange because I DID specify themagisk-preinit-device as metadata which is what worked before and even having patched the init_boot.img on the device itself it does say sda10 which is metadata:

husky:/ $ ls -l /dev/block/by-name/metadata
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 2024-06-04 09:29 /dev/block/by-name/metadata -> /dev/block/sda10

Not 100% sure if it's a magisk issue or a avbroot patching issue. :(

Update: Full message from Magisk is:

Requires Additional Setup:

Your device needs reflash Magisk to work properly. Please reinstall Magisk within app; recovery mode cannot get correct device info.

@chenxiaolong
Copy link
Owner

Awesome!

Just to double check: did you also install the updated Magisk APK?

If the error happens even when the installed APK matches what the OTA was patched with, can you check a couple things?

  • Check if the version numbers at the top of /data/adb/magisk/util_functions.sh matches assets/util_functions.sh inside the APK.
  • Check if Device type in stat /debug_ramdisk/.magisk/device/preinit matches the metadata partition (stat /dev/block/sda10).

Also, could you upload both the init_boot patched from the app and also the init_boot extracted from the OTA (avbroot ota extract -i ota.zip -d .)?

@cawilliamson
Copy link
Author

How DARE you?! Of course I installed the latest APK!!! >:O

Ok.... yep... I'm an idiot. I forgot to install the new APK. :( Thank you for your patience with me on this one! I owe you a beer or ten! 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants