Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor plan to match config #245

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 14, 2019
Merged

Conversation

ryanking
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This is a refactoring to make it easier to make AWS providers optional (and add other providers).

Test Plan

All existing tests pass, plus I tested manually on shared-infra.

@ryanking ryanking requested a review from a team as a code owner May 14, 2019 23:07
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 14, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #245 into master will decrease coverage by 0.33%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #245      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   78.46%   78.13%   -0.34%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        1240     1221      -19     
==========================================
- Hits          973      954      -19     
  Misses        161      161              
  Partials      106      106
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
util/template.go 82.35% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
plan/travisci.go 94.28% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
config/v2/validation.go 90.32% <100%> (+0.6%) ⬆️
apply/apply.go 64.04% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
plan/plan.go 85.36% <100%> (-2.27%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 788a4f4...cdaa7ff. Read the comment docs.

@@ -29,6 +30,7 @@ func TestIntegration(t *testing.T) {
for _, tc := range testCases {
t.Run(tc.fileName, func(t *testing.T) {
a := assert.New(t)
r := require.New(t)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

huh, seems like this is what we'd want to be using in general rather than assert

@czimergebot czimergebot merged commit 8584e81 into master May 14, 2019
@ryanking ryanking deleted the ryanking/aws_provider_optional branch May 20, 2019 18:14
palasha pushed a commit to palasha/fogg that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2020
refactor plan to match config### Summary
This is a refactoring to make it easier to make AWS  providers optional (and add other providers).

### Test Plan
All existing tests pass, plus I tested manually on shared-infra.
@vincenthsh vincenthsh mentioned this pull request Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants