Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

editorial pass #1

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 15, 2022
Merged

editorial pass #1

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 15, 2022

Conversation

bumblefudge
Copy link

Signed-off-by: bumblefudge [email protected]

bumblefudge added 2 commits December 8, 2022 23:34
Signed-off-by: bumblefudge <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: bumblefudge <[email protected]>
@bumblefudge
Copy link
Author

bumblefudge commented Dec 9, 2022

@zachferland i can't tag you for review but you should probably check nothign I rephrased got mangled, particularly this and this

Copy link

@zachferland zachferland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks @bumblefudge, minor wording change to your edits, let me know if that makes sense

eip155/caip168.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
32 byte argument is the merkle-root CID. A CID is more than 32 bytes, and a
partial CID is used to allow the argument to be efficiently packed in the
transaction. Function name or contract does not matter, and is up to the
implementation. Use of a root CID encoded in [DAG-CBOR][] is recommended.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

Co-authored-by: Zach Ferland <[email protected]>
Copy link

@zachferland zachferland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks! lgtm

@zachferland zachferland merged commit 201c454 into ceramicnetwork:feat/add-168-for-eip155 Dec 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants