e2e: ceph-csi-operator deployment support #4947
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Praveen M <[email protected]>
This commit adds `operatorDeployment` flag, defaults to false. Set this to true for running test on ceph-csi deployment via operator. Signed-off-by: Praveen M <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Praveen M <[email protected]>
This commits adds e2e/operator.go containing utility methods specific to the operator. Signed-off-by: Praveen M <[email protected]>
iPraveenParihar
force-pushed
the
e2e/ceph-csi-operator-deployment-support
branch
from
306a93b
to
0013f7a
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe what this PR does
This PR supports running e2e tests against a ceph-csi deployment via ceph-csi-operator.
Includes -
Is there anything that requires special attention
Do you have any questions?
Is the change backward compatible?
Are there concerns around backward compatibility?
Provide any external context for the change, if any.
For example:
Related issues
Mention any github issues relevant to this PR. Adding below line
will help to auto close the issue once the PR is merged.
Fixes: #4856
Future concerns
List items that are not part of the PR and do not impact it's
functionality, but are work items that can be taken up subsequently.
Checklist:
Show available bot commands
These commands are normally not required, but in case of issues, leave any of
the following bot commands in an otherwise empty comment in this PR:
/retest ci/centos/<job-name>: retest the<job-name>after unrelatedfailure (please report the failure too!)