Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using glibc for amd64 and muslc for arm64 #2213

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 22, 2023

Conversation

jcortejoso
Copy link
Member

Description

As pointed by @carterqw2 (🙏 ), celo-bls-go is not compatible with musl for amd64.

This PR aims to use glibc for amd64 image, and musl for arm64 images.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 21, 2023

Coverage from tests in ./e2e_test/... for ./consensus/istanbul/... at commit 3a189b0

coverage: 50.7% of statements across all listed packages
coverage:  63.2% of statements in consensus/istanbul
coverage:  42.7% of statements in consensus/istanbul/announce
coverage:  55.7% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend
coverage:   0.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend/backendtest
coverage:  24.3% of statements in consensus/istanbul/backend/internal/replica
coverage:  64.7% of statements in consensus/istanbul/core
coverage:  50.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/db
coverage:   0.0% of statements in consensus/istanbul/proxy
coverage:  64.2% of statements in consensus/istanbul/uptime
coverage:  51.8% of statements in consensus/istanbul/validator
coverage:  79.2% of statements in consensus/istanbul/validator/random

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 21, 2023

5881 passed, 45 skipped

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 21, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (44c7490) 55.09% compared to head (44e4e06) 55.12%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2213      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   55.09%   55.12%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         683      683              
  Lines      114533   114533              
==========================================
+ Hits        63100    63137      +37     
+ Misses      47541    47502      -39     
- Partials     3892     3894       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jcortejoso jcortejoso merged commit 3a189b0 into master Dec 22, 2023
26 checks passed
@jcortejoso jcortejoso deleted the jcortejoso/dockefile-compilers branch December 22, 2023 11:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants