docs: add audit report #259
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes introduced an "Audits" section in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s) (Beta)The changes are documentation updates and do not include new features or modifications to the control flow. Hence, no sequence diagrams are necessary. Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)
120-124: The "Audits" section is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives.Consider adding a note explaining why the commit hash is not included, as mentioned in the PR description.
Line range hint
93-93: Consider adding a comma after "leafs" for better readability.- ...with four leafs which looks like this: + ...with four leafs, which looks like this:
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docs/audit/informal-systems.pdfis excluded by!**/*.pdf
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (2)
README.md (2)
Near line 12: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...ange of namespaces of the messages in all of the descendants of each node. The leafs i...
Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE
Near line 93: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...eate a Namespaced merkle tree with four leafs which looks like this: 
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #259 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 66.43% 66.43%
=======================================
Files 6 6
Lines 1028 1028
=======================================
Hits 683 683
Misses 328 328
Partials 17 17 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
Line range hint
4-4: Consider adding a comma before "i.e." to improve readability.- for a different branch, specify the branch parameter in the URL() + for a different branch, specify the branch parameter in the URL(),
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- README.md (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (2)
README.md (2)
Near line 4: Consider putting a comma before the abbreviation “i.e.”.
Context: .../pkg.go.dev/github.com/celestiaorg/nmt)<!-- it retrieves the lint workflow status badge for the default branch i.e., main, for a different branch, specify ...
Rule ID: IE_COMMA
Near line 12: Consider removing “of” to be more concise
Context: ...ange of namespaces of the messages in all of the descendants of each node. The leafs i...
Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE
Additional comments not posted (1)
README.md (1)
120-124: The "Audits" section is well-integrated and provides clear information.
Closes #228
The commit hash in the PDF isn't for this repo so I didn't include a column for the commit hash in the table. IMO we should include one but I couldn't find the commit hash that was audited so 🤷♂️
Summary by CodeRabbit