Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: document the unnecessary TODO #280

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 23, 2024

Conversation

rach-id
Copy link
Member

@rach-id rach-id commented Jan 17, 2024

Overview

Checklist

  • New and updated code has appropriate documentation
  • New and updated code has new and/or updated testing
  • Required CI checks are passing
  • Visual proof for any user facing features like CLI or documentation updates
  • Linked issues closed with keywords

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Improved comments for clarity on special cases within the tree handling logic.

@rach-id rach-id added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 17, 2024
@rach-id rach-id self-assigned this Jan 17, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent update to the NamespaceMerkleTree.sol file enhances code clarity by including new comments. These additions elucidate the rationale behind specific conditions, particularly when proofs are absent and when an inner node doubles as the root in larger trees. The removal of a placeholder comment suggests that a previously noted task or fix has been addressed.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.../tree/namespace/NamespaceMerkleTree.sol Removed a TODO comment; added explanations for handling empty proofs and cases with inner nodes as roots in multi-node trees.

Poem

In the grove of code where the logic trees grow,
A change was made, with understanding in tow.
🐰 "No more TODOs," the rabbit did cheer,
"Just comments so clear, as the root node draws near!"

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 20b4d30 and 78ae9f6.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/lib/tree/namespace/NamespaceMerkleTree.sol (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
src/lib/tree/namespace/NamespaceMerkleTree.sol (1)
  • 76-79: The comments added on lines 76-79 explain why a certain case is not relevant to the use case of the library. This is a good practice as it clarifies the intent and scope of the code, preventing future misunderstandings or incorrect assumptions about the code's behavior.

@rach-id rach-id merged commit 165b42a into celestiaorg:master Jan 23, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants