chore(structure): restructure project layout #1712
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stegayet
force-pushed
the
chore/restructure-project-layout
branch
2 times, most recently
from
58f5117
to
150df7a
Compare
stegayet
force-pushed
the
chore/restructure-project-layout
branch
4 times, most recently
from
792d711
to
80600af
Compare
|
As per your CI run, it says: First commit in this PR switches from |
stegayet
force-pushed
the
chore/restructure-project-layout
branch
from
80600af
to
50fec65
Compare
stegayet
force-pushed
the
chore/restructure-project-layout
branch
from
ce1ed56
to
6307b96
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Towards #1705.
This PR restructures project layout as expected by poetry. Needed changes are:
t/totests/to follow standard convention.extrasfolder as it seems unused (Appveyor CI related script but this repository is using GHA + symlink torequirementsfolder) andsetuptoolsis having trouble finding top-level package, i.ekombu. (EDIT: done in 02509ac)With this change, we can safely remove
packagesargument tosetupcall.Resources:
How this has been tested ?
python setup.py buildhas been successfully run with correct package content.