-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 211
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support writeOnly + required combination #149
Comments
Any progress on this? It would be so awesome to have this feature. It stands between me being able to use the same schema for get and post operations vs having to create separate almost-duplicates. |
I am also curious about this. I really need this feature. |
Commenting to say this feature is still desired. And that a pull request exists for it, #756, if @cdimascio could review it. |
available in v5.1.5. thanks @pdhau |
@all-contributors add @pdhau for code and test |
I've put up a pull request to add @pdhau! 🎉 |
Notes below copied from @Haruki-Mortis readonly issue
Documentation definition
writeOnly (The writeOnly functionality has not been checked yet)
related issue: #145
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: