Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feature/#279: Added and adjusted tavern tests to http code 206 for running jobs #649

Merged

Conversation

ds-alexander-bulgakov
Copy link

No description provided.

@ds-alexander-bulgakov ds-alexander-bulgakov merged commit ed552e3 into main Nov 16, 2023
@ds-alexander-bulgakov ds-alexander-bulgakov deleted the feature/#279_adjust-tavern-tests-to-http-206-code branch November 16, 2023 13:38
Copy link

@ds-psosnowski ds-psosnowski left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
- but results in failures in PolicyCheckerServiceTest
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
…NameGenerator

in order to make test names more readable when executed in the IDE
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
…constraints

(must have same amount of constraints to ensure that there isn't any subset match in any direction)
ds-pweick referenced this pull request in ds-pweick/tx-item-relationship-service Jul 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants