Using in-house GenericDataChunkIterator

[h-mayorquin]

As in the title.

We thought we were testing this for a while but turns out we did not.

[CodyCBakerPhD]

@pauladkisson Dashboard CI credentials failing: https://github.com/catalystneuro/neuroconv/actions/runs/10797958105/job/29950369454?pr=1068#step:2:6

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.36%. Comparing base (81a022d) to head (198a6ec).
Report is 10 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1068      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.32%   90.36%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         129      129              
  Lines        7996     7998       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         7222     7227       +5     
+ Misses        774      771       -3     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	90.36% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...oconv/datainterfaces/behavior/video/video_utils.py	97.14% <100.00%> (ø)
..._helpers/_configuration_models/_base_dataset_io.py	95.76% <100.00%> (-0.04%)	⬇️
...roiextractors/imagingextractordatachunkiterator.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...erface/spikeinterfacerecordingdatachunkiterator.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes