[Pydantic IVb] Pydantic validation on arrays

[CodyCBakerPhD]

Follow up to add remaining validation calls for interfaces using arrays

[CodyCBakerPhD]

@h-mayorquin I think this is resolved now

[h-mayorquin]

OK, this makes sense. Maybe we should add these to all the validate calls so no one needs to encounter this error if they decide to use a non pydantic type in the future.

I wish there was some kind of global configuration on this case or that we could call the validate decorator in the BaseDataInterface

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.32%. Comparing base (675ec48) to head (7b842c1).
Report is 61 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1055   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.32%   90.32%           
=======================================
  Files         129      129           
  Lines        7988     7991    +3     
=======================================
+ Hits         7215     7218    +3     
  Misses        773      773           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	90.32% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
.../ecephys/spikegadgets/spikegadgetsdatainterface.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...terfaces/ecephys/spikeglx/spikeglxnidqinterface.py	97.67% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
...onv/datainterfaces/ophys/hdf5/hdf5datainterface.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)