-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Incremental decommit in tui #1518
Conversation
b4ac06b
to
63ebc2a
Compare
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5188 | 5.85 | 2.31 | 0.44 |
2 | 5387 | 7.18 | 2.84 | 0.47 |
3 | 5594 | 8.37 | 3.30 | 0.49 |
5 | 5997 | 11.22 | 4.43 | 0.54 |
10 | 6998 | 18.02 | 7.12 | 0.66 |
56 | 16247 | 81.52 | 32.24 | 1.76 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 559 | 10.52 | 4.15 | 0.29 |
2 | 749 | 13.86 | 5.65 | 0.34 |
3 | 936 | 17.33 | 7.20 | 0.38 |
5 | 1303 | 24.65 | 10.44 | 0.48 |
10 | 2244 | 45.22 | 19.36 | 0.75 |
20 | 4115 | 95.99 | 40.76 | 1.40 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 549 | 22.17 | 8.68 | 0.42 |
2 | 112 | 658 | 33.90 | 13.40 | 0.55 |
3 | 170 | 769 | 47.47 | 18.95 | 0.70 |
4 | 224 | 879 | 62.63 | 25.18 | 0.88 |
5 | 282 | 989 | 74.93 | 30.47 | 1.02 |
6 | 339 | 1100 | 92.22 | 37.76 | 1.22 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 622 | 17.96 | 7.88 | 0.38 |
2 | 790 | 19.36 | 9.17 | 0.41 |
3 | 894 | 20.65 | 10.39 | 0.43 |
5 | 1153 | 22.76 | 12.62 | 0.48 |
10 | 1840 | 29.73 | 19.00 | 0.61 |
49 | 7699 | 94.61 | 72.67 | 1.78 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 657 | 21.02 | 9.42 | 0.42 |
2 | 849 | 22.79 | 11.13 | 0.45 |
3 | 913 | 23.96 | 12.21 | 0.47 |
5 | 1171 | 26.82 | 14.99 | 0.53 |
10 | 2078 | 36.03 | 23.63 | 0.70 |
50 | 8041 | 99.64 | 84.28 | 1.92 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 623 | 26.76 | 11.34 | 0.48 |
2 | 763 | 28.56 | 12.86 | 0.51 |
3 | 991 | 31.14 | 15.05 | 0.55 |
5 | 1409 | 35.44 | 18.76 | 0.63 |
10 | 2010 | 43.98 | 26.01 | 0.78 |
39 | 6190 | 98.62 | 72.63 | 1.74 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5076 | 17.47 | 7.60 | 0.57 |
2 | 5136 | 27.48 | 11.97 | 0.68 |
3 | 5318 | 41.56 | 18.33 | 0.85 |
4 | 5357 | 48.60 | 21.23 | 0.93 |
5 | 5568 | 75.80 | 33.67 | 1.25 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTxO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 0 | 0 | 5023 | 7.95 | 3.36 | 0.46 |
5 | 1 | 57 | 5057 | 8.88 | 3.99 | 0.47 |
5 | 5 | 284 | 5191 | 13.41 | 6.84 | 0.54 |
5 | 10 | 569 | 5362 | 19.26 | 10.48 | 0.62 |
5 | 20 | 1139 | 5701 | 30.58 | 17.60 | 0.78 |
5 | 30 | 1707 | 6041 | 41.90 | 24.72 | 0.93 |
5 | 40 | 2280 | 6384 | 53.23 | 31.84 | 1.09 |
5 | 50 | 2847 | 6721 | 64.96 | 39.14 | 1.25 |
5 | 81 | 4610 | 7772 | 99.73 | 61.10 | 1.74 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2024-07-23 08:16:49.163920259 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 3000 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 5.894443664 |
P99 | 16.484885849999973ms |
P95 | 8.209742199999999ms |
P50 | 5.0371135ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 9000 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 24.817604812 |
P99 | 52.624454010000015ms |
P95 | 33.78836635ms |
P50 | 22.9287215ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
63ebc2a
to
09d342b
Compare
6eac887
to
a3a1ce1
Compare
09d342b
to
cd60424
Compare
Test Results464 tests 452 ✅ 17m 43s ⏱️ Results for commit 1b09027. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
ca38c87
to
6daa29a
Compare
a3a1ce1
to
3467137
Compare
77b6ca1
to
0bd5421
Compare
5600db5
to
105ff76
Compare
0bd5421
to
1b09027
Compare
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5189 | 5.69 | 2.25 | 0.44 |
2 | 5390 | 7.27 | 2.88 | 0.47 |
3 | 5591 | 8.46 | 3.34 | 0.49 |
5 | 5994 | 11.39 | 4.51 | 0.54 |
10 | 6998 | 18.02 | 7.12 | 0.66 |
56 | 16247 | 81.43 | 32.21 | 1.76 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 559 | 10.52 | 4.15 | 0.29 |
2 | 745 | 13.86 | 5.65 | 0.34 |
3 | 936 | 17.33 | 7.20 | 0.38 |
5 | 1312 | 24.65 | 10.44 | 0.48 |
10 | 2241 | 45.22 | 19.36 | 0.75 |
20 | 4115 | 95.99 | 40.76 | 1.40 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 549 | 21.46 | 8.41 | 0.41 |
2 | 113 | 663 | 32.28 | 12.81 | 0.53 |
3 | 170 | 769 | 45.10 | 18.06 | 0.68 |
4 | 226 | 879 | 58.67 | 23.72 | 0.83 |
5 | 281 | 989 | 79.34 | 32.11 | 1.07 |
6 | 338 | 1100 | 98.37 | 40.04 | 1.28 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 638 | 17.71 | 7.79 | 0.38 |
2 | 760 | 18.64 | 8.82 | 0.40 |
3 | 1031 | 22.26 | 10.99 | 0.45 |
5 | 1236 | 23.45 | 12.87 | 0.49 |
10 | 2017 | 33.25 | 20.40 | 0.65 |
49 | 7875 | 97.55 | 73.74 | 1.82 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 646 | 20.98 | 9.39 | 0.42 |
2 | 855 | 22.86 | 11.16 | 0.45 |
3 | 975 | 24.18 | 12.50 | 0.48 |
5 | 1176 | 26.70 | 14.94 | 0.53 |
10 | 2093 | 35.91 | 23.59 | 0.70 |
50 | 8107 | 99.02 | 83.94 | 1.91 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 691 | 27.14 | 11.68 | 0.48 |
2 | 837 | 28.90 | 13.19 | 0.52 |
3 | 895 | 30.34 | 14.37 | 0.54 |
5 | 1266 | 34.72 | 18.09 | 0.62 |
10 | 2206 | 46.07 | 27.68 | 0.82 |
38 | 6325 | 97.32 | 71.94 | 1.73 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5056 | 17.36 | 7.55 | 0.57 |
2 | 5135 | 25.09 | 10.86 | 0.66 |
3 | 5278 | 37.68 | 16.48 | 0.81 |
4 | 5544 | 59.61 | 26.51 | 1.07 |
5 | 5543 | 66.64 | 29.38 | 1.14 |
6 | 5767 | 93.95 | 41.81 | 1.46 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTxO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 0 | 0 | 5023 | 7.75 | 3.28 | 0.46 |
5 | 1 | 57 | 5056 | 9.08 | 4.08 | 0.48 |
5 | 5 | 283 | 5190 | 13.80 | 7.01 | 0.54 |
5 | 10 | 569 | 5361 | 18.87 | 10.31 | 0.61 |
5 | 20 | 1137 | 5699 | 30.38 | 17.51 | 0.77 |
5 | 30 | 1709 | 6043 | 41.31 | 24.46 | 0.93 |
5 | 40 | 2276 | 6380 | 53.23 | 31.84 | 1.09 |
5 | 50 | 2846 | 6720 | 64.56 | 38.97 | 1.25 |
5 | 81 | 4607 | 7769 | 99.33 | 60.93 | 1.73 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2024-07-23 08:46:42.173728871 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 3000 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 4.595124230 |
P99 | 11.243477639999929ms |
P95 | 5.734636999999988ms |
P50 | 4.281394000000001ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 9000 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 23.755808878 |
P99 | 57.831976040000015ms |
P95 | 32.9947106ms |
P50 | 21.484098ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
105ff76
to
a70a781
Compare
1b09027
to
d89b36b
Compare
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5186 | 5.61 | 2.21 | 0.44 |
2 | 5394 | 7.07 | 2.79 | 0.46 |
3 | 5591 | 8.46 | 3.34 | 0.49 |
5 | 5993 | 11.12 | 4.39 | 0.54 |
10 | 6998 | 18.02 | 7.12 | 0.66 |
56 | 16246 | 81.43 | 32.21 | 1.76 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 557 | 10.52 | 4.15 | 0.29 |
2 | 742 | 13.86 | 5.65 | 0.34 |
3 | 930 | 17.33 | 7.20 | 0.38 |
5 | 1309 | 24.65 | 10.44 | 0.48 |
10 | 2239 | 45.22 | 19.36 | 0.75 |
20 | 4118 | 95.99 | 40.76 | 1.40 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 549 | 22.14 | 8.66 | 0.42 |
2 | 114 | 663 | 33.97 | 13.43 | 0.55 |
3 | 171 | 769 | 45.26 | 18.13 | 0.68 |
4 | 226 | 879 | 61.03 | 24.59 | 0.86 |
5 | 282 | 989 | 79.19 | 32.06 | 1.06 |
6 | 340 | 1100 | 97.90 | 39.85 | 1.28 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 634 | 17.93 | 7.88 | 0.38 |
2 | 718 | 17.84 | 8.52 | 0.39 |
3 | 963 | 20.80 | 10.38 | 0.44 |
5 | 1272 | 24.98 | 13.52 | 0.51 |
10 | 1995 | 33.65 | 20.53 | 0.66 |
49 | 7715 | 96.66 | 73.49 | 1.80 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 647 | 21.02 | 9.41 | 0.42 |
2 | 844 | 22.86 | 11.16 | 0.45 |
3 | 984 | 24.26 | 12.54 | 0.48 |
5 | 1244 | 27.08 | 15.29 | 0.53 |
10 | 2101 | 35.91 | 23.60 | 0.70 |
49 | 7686 | 95.45 | 80.80 | 1.84 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 688 | 27.18 | 11.69 | 0.48 |
2 | 864 | 29.34 | 13.53 | 0.52 |
3 | 978 | 31.13 | 15.03 | 0.55 |
5 | 1240 | 34.68 | 18.05 | 0.62 |
10 | 2148 | 45.53 | 27.27 | 0.81 |
39 | 6420 | 98.69 | 73.18 | 1.76 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5055 | 17.51 | 7.61 | 0.57 |
2 | 5259 | 29.57 | 13.04 | 0.71 |
3 | 5212 | 36.60 | 15.92 | 0.79 |
4 | 5423 | 53.92 | 23.79 | 1.00 |
5 | 5628 | 72.68 | 32.23 | 1.22 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTxO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 0 | 0 | 5022 | 7.95 | 3.36 | 0.46 |
5 | 1 | 57 | 5056 | 8.69 | 3.91 | 0.47 |
5 | 5 | 285 | 5193 | 13.60 | 6.92 | 0.54 |
5 | 10 | 569 | 5361 | 19.06 | 10.39 | 0.62 |
5 | 20 | 1140 | 5702 | 30.38 | 17.51 | 0.77 |
5 | 30 | 1706 | 6041 | 41.51 | 24.55 | 0.93 |
5 | 40 | 2275 | 6379 | 53.23 | 31.84 | 1.09 |
5 | 50 | 2845 | 6719 | 64.76 | 39.06 | 1.25 |
5 | 81 | 4606 | 7768 | 99.62 | 61.05 | 1.74 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2024-07-23 08:59:53.166068988 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 3000 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 5.222286034 |
P99 | 9.936988809999994ms |
P95 | 6.926216349999998ms |
P50 | 4.963436ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 9000 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 24.127021049 |
P99 | 71.58573134000241ms |
P95 | 32.9112434ms |
P50 | 21.7847335ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
d89b36b
to
dcf2fe6
Compare
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5189 | 5.81 | 2.30 | 0.44 |
2 | 5390 | 7.18 | 2.84 | 0.47 |
3 | 5588 | 8.56 | 3.39 | 0.49 |
5 | 5993 | 11.26 | 4.45 | 0.54 |
10 | 6999 | 18.38 | 7.28 | 0.66 |
56 | 16246 | 81.63 | 32.29 | 1.76 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 556 | 10.52 | 4.15 | 0.29 |
2 | 746 | 13.86 | 5.65 | 0.34 |
3 | 937 | 17.33 | 7.20 | 0.38 |
5 | 1307 | 24.65 | 10.44 | 0.48 |
10 | 2250 | 45.22 | 19.36 | 0.75 |
20 | 4110 | 95.99 | 40.76 | 1.40 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 549 | 22.14 | 8.66 | 0.42 |
2 | 114 | 659 | 33.93 | 13.42 | 0.55 |
3 | 170 | 769 | 45.39 | 18.18 | 0.68 |
4 | 226 | 879 | 62.53 | 25.14 | 0.88 |
5 | 283 | 989 | 80.03 | 32.39 | 1.07 |
6 | 340 | 1100 | 97.53 | 39.69 | 1.27 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 640 | 17.96 | 7.90 | 0.38 |
2 | 795 | 18.61 | 8.80 | 0.40 |
3 | 848 | 19.17 | 9.77 | 0.41 |
5 | 1198 | 23.56 | 12.92 | 0.49 |
10 | 1943 | 33.37 | 20.43 | 0.65 |
50 | 7904 | 99.08 | 75.19 | 1.84 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 596 | 20.60 | 9.07 | 0.41 |
2 | 786 | 22.62 | 10.94 | 0.45 |
3 | 946 | 24.26 | 12.50 | 0.48 |
5 | 1177 | 26.66 | 14.93 | 0.53 |
10 | 2085 | 35.51 | 23.36 | 0.70 |
50 | 7831 | 97.95 | 82.77 | 1.88 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 623 | 26.76 | 11.34 | 0.48 |
2 | 823 | 28.98 | 13.22 | 0.52 |
3 | 937 | 30.72 | 14.69 | 0.55 |
5 | 1206 | 34.15 | 17.67 | 0.61 |
10 | 1987 | 44.08 | 26.17 | 0.78 |
38 | 6218 | 98.20 | 72.33 | 1.74 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5074 | 17.32 | 7.54 | 0.57 |
2 | 5259 | 29.30 | 12.94 | 0.71 |
3 | 5293 | 41.66 | 18.36 | 0.85 |
4 | 5480 | 58.25 | 25.82 | 1.05 |
5 | 5492 | 67.03 | 29.51 | 1.15 |
6 | 5770 | 96.61 | 43.09 | 1.50 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTxO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 0 | 0 | 5022 | 7.95 | 3.36 | 0.46 |
5 | 1 | 57 | 5056 | 9.08 | 4.08 | 0.48 |
5 | 5 | 285 | 5193 | 13.21 | 6.75 | 0.53 |
5 | 10 | 568 | 5360 | 19.06 | 10.39 | 0.62 |
5 | 20 | 1140 | 5702 | 30.58 | 17.60 | 0.78 |
5 | 30 | 1708 | 6042 | 41.90 | 24.72 | 0.93 |
5 | 40 | 2274 | 6378 | 52.84 | 31.67 | 1.09 |
5 | 50 | 2844 | 6718 | 64.45 | 38.92 | 1.25 |
5 | 81 | 4607 | 7768 | 99.14 | 60.84 | 1.73 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2024-07-23 10:41:07.159939741 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 3000 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 3.964458419 |
P99 | 8.55323176999999ms |
P95 | 4.804950299999999ms |
P50 | 3.743617ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 9000 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 22.842029533 |
P99 | 114.39313516ms |
P95 | 32.4264434ms |
P50 | 20.022088ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
Fixes #1517