CIP-0016 | Adjust preamble and structure w.r.t CIP-0001

[rphair]

Fixes #659.

(edited proposal)

[rphair]

@intricate although this was merged as Active I didn't see that any commercial or community implementations were indicated in the linked discussion, nor could I find any of these today.

Since the CIP as merged didn't have anything like a Path to Active indicating progress that would have validated it as Active, I've reset the status to Proposed. Perhaps it was given Active status based on expectation or as a formality.

In any case, if you or anyone else know implementations of this proposed standard then please post here and we can change the status back to Active if appropriate.

[Ryun1]

or anyone else know implementations of this proposed standard

I think jcli, cardano-signer and CSL support these formats.

[rphair]

That's why we need you @Ryun1 😎 ... resetting back to Active status with proper documentation of current implementations as you've indicated.

Also I realised in hindsight that CIP-0001 allows N/A for an Implementation Plan which I think is appropriate when real-world implementations precede or substitute a designated reference implementation... so I've also set that in this typical case.

[Ryun1]

That's why we need you @Ryun1 😎 ... resetting back to Active status with proper documentation of current implementations as you've indicated.

This is why we are a team!

[Crypto2099]

LGTM