Implement auto return types, removing => returns #850
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
geoffromer
reviewed
Sep 24, 2021
executable_semantics/testdata/function/auto_return/fail_direct_recurse.carbon
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…_recurse.carbon Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <[email protected]>
geoffromer
approved these changes
Sep 27, 2021
chandlerc
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2022
This implements #826, I think covering everything important there. Regarding ReturnTypeContext, I broke that out because it started feeling like a significant number of args to be passing around, and I think this makes the association inside type checking clearer. Co-authored-by: Geoff Romer <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This implements #826, I think covering everything important there.
Regarding ReturnTypeContext, I broke that out because it started feeling like a significant number of args to be passing around, and I think this makes the association inside type checking clearer.