Support deduction of the types of struct fields #4500
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jonmeow
reviewed
Nov 7, 2024
Comment on lines
+86
to
+98
| const auto& arg_fields = context_.struct_type_fields().Get(args); | ||
| if (param_fields.size() != arg_fields.size()) { | ||
| // TODO: Decide whether to error on this or just treat the parameter list | ||
| // as non-deduced. For now we treat it as non-deduced. | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| // Don't do deduction unless the names match in order. | ||
| // TODO: Support reordering of names. | ||
| for (auto [param, arg] : llvm::zip_equal(param_fields, arg_fields)) { | ||
| if (param.name_id != arg.name_id) { | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How are each of these tested? I see where it's tested when the struct is consistent, but what about the various invalid cases?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-on to #4492 .