Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(icon): makes up-to-top = back-to-top #5509

Merged
merged 14 commits into from
Mar 4, 2020

Conversation

chrisconnors-ibm
Copy link
Contributor

@chrisconnors-ibm chrisconnors-ibm commented Mar 3, 2020

Missed 32/up-to-top.svg and worked on deprecated 32/back-to-top.svg in #5422
This PR makes 32/up-to-top.svg and 32/back-to-top.svg identical, deletes 16/up-to-top.svg, updates
packages/icons/deprecated.yml to reflect depreciation of back-to-top name

Changelog

Changed

  • removes bespoke size 16 from packages/icons/icons.yml @ l1447
    makes 32/up-to-top.svg = 32/back-to-top.svg
    updates packages/icons/deprecated.yml to reflect depreciation of back-to-top name

Removed

  • 16/up-to-top.svg

Testing / Reviewing

confirm that
https://deploy-preview-5509--carbon-elements.netlify.com/icons/examples/preview/#32%2Fback-to-top

and
https://deploy-preview-5509--carbon-elements.netlify.com/icons/examples/preview/#32%2Fup-to-top

and variants are identical, @1x and @2x displays

makes back-to-top = up-to-top
makes 32/up-to-top.svg = 32/back-to-top.svg (deprecated name)

deletes 16/up-to-top.svg
removes bespoke size 16 from icons.yml
@ghost ghost requested review from abbeyhrt and tw15egan March 3, 2020 00:37
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 3, 2020

Deploy preview for carbon-elements ready!

Built with commit 7f48000

https://deploy-preview-5509--carbon-elements.netlify.com

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 3, 2020

Deploy preview for carbon-components-react ready!

Built with commit 7f48000

https://deploy-preview-5509--carbon-components-react.netlify.com

Copy link
Contributor

@joshblack joshblack left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need to deprecate any assets or are we good to go?

@chrisconnors-ibm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Do we need to deprecate any assets or are we good to go?

@joshblack I think we’re deprecating back-to-top in favor of up-to-top, and deleting a duplicate size (16/up-to-top.svg), but need to better understand the new deprecating mechanisms

@joshblack joshblack merged commit f1ce802 into carbon-design-system:master Mar 4, 2020
@chrisconnors-ibm chrisconnors-ibm deleted the up-to-top branch March 4, 2020 22:30
joshblack added a commit to joshblack/carbon that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2020
* Delete up-to-top.svg

makes back-to-top = up-to-top

* updates to up-to-top

makes 32/up-to-top.svg = 32/back-to-top.svg (deprecated name)

deletes 16/up-to-top.svg

* Update icons.yml

removes bespoke size 16 from icons.yml

* Update deprecated.yml

* Update deprecated.yml

clearer call to action for deprecation reasons

Co-authored-by: TJ Egan <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Josh Black <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants