Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DPE-4615] Add support for tracing with tempo_k8s #250

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

shayancanonical
Copy link
Contributor

@shayancanonical shayancanonical commented Jun 4, 2024

Issue

We would like to be able to instrument our charm and generate traces to discover inefficiencies in charm code execution. The observability team has developed a charm for tempo that we would like to integrate with.

Solution

Integrate with the tempo charm

Considerations

  1. We must use COS lite with edge until it is release to stable with some
  2. We are sending traces with HTTP until some rough edges are rounded with HTTPS

image

@shayancanonical shayancanonical marked this pull request as ready for review June 4, 2024 20:14
@taurus-forever
Copy link
Contributor

Copy link
Contributor

@carlcsaposs-canonical carlcsaposs-canonical left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shayancanonical
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested a fix for failing unit tests in a68944f. The issue of the fix was related to canonical/tempo-k8s-operator#120

@shayancanonical shayancanonical merged commit 1a28465 into main Jun 12, 2024
21 checks passed
@shayancanonical shayancanonical deleted the feature/tempo_tracing branch June 12, 2024 12:05
@shayancanonical shayancanonical changed the title Add support for tracing with tempo_k8s [DPE-4615] Add support for tracing with tempo_k8s Jun 12, 2024
github-actions bot added a commit to carlcsaposs-canonical/mysql-router-k8s-operator that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants