Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: HA #1208

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
Aug 20, 2020
Merged

Feature: HA #1208

merged 20 commits into from
Aug 20, 2020

Conversation

ktsakalozos
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ktsakalozos ktsakalozos changed the title Feature/ha enable WIP: Feature/ha enable May 20, 2020
@ktsakalozos ktsakalozos force-pushed the feature/ha-enable branch 2 times, most recently from 1c05e6e to 06c7d75 Compare June 11, 2020 20:14
@ktsakalozos ktsakalozos requested a review from knkski as a code owner June 17, 2020 06:06
@ktsakalozos
Copy link
Member Author

s/no/disabled/?

Thank you for the suggestion @MichaelGooden. The reason we did not go for the disable/enable is because it may be confused with the ha-cluster addon. For example, you snap install microk8s and you check the status and you see high-availability reporting "no". If we had high-availability set to disabled users may be trying to "microk8s enable ha-cluster" not realizing that high-availability to become "enabled" needs a three node cluster.

@ktsakalozos ktsakalozos mentioned this pull request Jul 7, 2020
@ktsakalozos ktsakalozos changed the title WIP: Feature/ha enable Feature: HA Aug 20, 2020
@ktsakalozos ktsakalozos merged commit 7bb1b25 into master Aug 20, 2020
@ktsakalozos ktsakalozos deleted the feature/ha-enable branch September 8, 2020 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants